NCT03156608

Brief Summary

This study will be conducted on women in labor. Fetal heart rate monitoring will be conducting using the Novii Fetal ECG/EMG system and comparing it to current standard of care external fetal heart rate and tocometry. These approaches will be compared with the respect to need for additional monitoring, amount of nursing intervention, cost and satisfaction of patients and healthcare providers.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
218

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

4 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 6, 2017

Completed
8 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 14, 2017

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 17, 2017

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 28, 2017

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 28, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

November 1, 2017

Status Verified

October 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

4 months

First QC Date

March 14, 2017

Last Update Submit

October 30, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

External Fetal Heart Rate MonitorFetal Heart Rate Monitor

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Amount of time in minutes with the interpretable fetal heart rate tracing during the course of labor.

    Quality of the fetal heart rate for each minute of tracing will be assessed visually by 2 or more blinded reviewers. For the purpose of this study, uninterpretable fetal heart rate will be defined as continuous fetal heart rate data with one or more of the following: 1. Data is missing for more than 75% of the minute of tracing 2. Artifact is present for more than 25% of the minute of tracing 3. Missing data or artifact prevents determination of baseline rate 1. \> 15 seconds of continuous missing tracing 2. Missing data is not continuous but is sufficiently frequent that the one minute segment of tracing could not be used to determine baseline rate The total number of interpretable minutes of fetal heart tracing and the percentage of time with interpretable fetal heart tracing over the course of labor (Number of minutes with interpretable FHR/Total number of minutes in labor) will be calculated for each patient.

    Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)

Secondary Outcomes (29)

  • Quality and interpretability of the FHT in ten minute segments

    Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)

  • Number and quality of uterine contractions in each 10 minute segment:

    Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)

  • Number and quality of uterine contractions in each 10 minute segment:

    Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)

  • Number of times fetal heart rate monitor requires adjusting:

    Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)

  • Number of times fetal heart rate monitor requires adjusting:

    Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)

  • +24 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Novii Device ECG/EMG System

EXPERIMENTAL

These patients will have the Novii ECG/EMG system placed throughout labor and delivery, unless a provider or investigator determines that a different device (internal or external) is necessary for a better signal.

Device: Novii ECG/EKG System

Standard of Care External Monitor

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

A standard external monitor will be placed throughout labor and delivery, unless a provider or investigator determines that an internal device is necessary for a better signal.

Device: External fetal heart rate monitoring

Interventions

External fetal heart rate monitoring

Novii Device ECG/EMG System

External fetal heart rate monitoring

Standard of Care External Monitor

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexfemale(Gender-based eligibility)
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Pregnant women ≥ 18 years of age; gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
  • Singleton pregnancy.
  • These women will be those presenting to Labor and Delivery for one of the following:
  • Rule out labor
  • Spontaneous labor
  • Induction of labor

You may not qualify if:

  • Age \< 18 years old; multiple gestation pregnancy; gestational age \< 37 weeks
  • Fetal distress or vaginal bleeding prior to monitor placement
  • Previous cesarean section
  • Planned cesarean delivery.
  • Women who are enrolled in the study but have less than 1 hour of fetal heart rate monitoring after randomization will be excluded from analysis.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (4)

Intermountain Medical Center

Murray, Utah, 84107, United States

Location

McKay-Dee Hospital

Ogden, Utah, 84403, United States

Location

Utah Valley Hospital

Provo, Utah, 84604, United States

Location

LDS Hospital

Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143, United States

Location

Related Publications (5)

  • Bakker PC, Colenbrander GJ, Verstraeten AA, Van Geijn HP. The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Sep 10;116(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.001.

    PMID: 15294362BACKGROUND
  • Cohen WR, Ommani S, Hassan S, Mirza FG, Solomon M, Brown R, Schifrin BS, Himsworth JM, Hayes-Gill BR. Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01533.x. Epub 2012 Oct 19.

    PMID: 22924738BACKGROUND
  • Cohen WR, Hayes-Gill B. Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):590-5. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12387. Epub 2014 Apr 30.

    PMID: 24684703BACKGROUND
  • Dawes GS, Visser GH, Goodman JD, Redman CW. Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Sep 1;141(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90673-6.

    PMID: 7270621BACKGROUND
  • Rooth G, Huch A, Huch R (1987) FIGO news: guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 25:159-167

    BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Fetal Distress

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Signs and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

  • Michael S Esplin, MD

    Staff Physician

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SCREENING
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Women will be randomized to either standard monitoring with external Doppler and tocodynamometer or monitoring with the Novii Fetal ECG/EMG system using a computer generated randomization scheme through REDCap. Randomization will occur in blocks based on the subject's BMI. Women with a BMI \< 30 will be randomized separate from women with a BMI \> 30.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Professor, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 14, 2017

First Posted

May 17, 2017

Study Start

March 6, 2017

Primary Completion

June 28, 2017

Study Completion

June 28, 2017

Last Updated

November 1, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-10

Locations