Novii External Fetal Monitoring Device
Novii
Evaluation of the Novii External Fetal Monitoring Device: A Prospective, Randomized Comparison
1 other identifier
interventional
218
1 country
4
Brief Summary
This study will be conducted on women in labor. Fetal heart rate monitoring will be conducting using the Novii Fetal ECG/EMG system and comparing it to current standard of care external fetal heart rate and tocometry. These approaches will be compared with the respect to need for additional monitoring, amount of nursing intervention, cost and satisfaction of patients and healthcare providers.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 6, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 17, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 28, 2017
CompletedNovember 1, 2017
October 1, 2017
4 months
March 14, 2017
October 30, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Amount of time in minutes with the interpretable fetal heart rate tracing during the course of labor.
Quality of the fetal heart rate for each minute of tracing will be assessed visually by 2 or more blinded reviewers. For the purpose of this study, uninterpretable fetal heart rate will be defined as continuous fetal heart rate data with one or more of the following: 1. Data is missing for more than 75% of the minute of tracing 2. Artifact is present for more than 25% of the minute of tracing 3. Missing data or artifact prevents determination of baseline rate 1. \> 15 seconds of continuous missing tracing 2. Missing data is not continuous but is sufficiently frequent that the one minute segment of tracing could not be used to determine baseline rate The total number of interpretable minutes of fetal heart tracing and the percentage of time with interpretable fetal heart tracing over the course of labor (Number of minutes with interpretable FHR/Total number of minutes in labor) will be calculated for each patient.
Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)
Secondary Outcomes (29)
Quality and interpretability of the FHT in ten minute segments
Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)
Number and quality of uterine contractions in each 10 minute segment:
Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)
Number and quality of uterine contractions in each 10 minute segment:
Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)
Number of times fetal heart rate monitor requires adjusting:
Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)
Number of times fetal heart rate monitor requires adjusting:
Time of randomization until time of delivery (up to 48 hours)
- +24 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Novii Device ECG/EMG System
EXPERIMENTALThese patients will have the Novii ECG/EMG system placed throughout labor and delivery, unless a provider or investigator determines that a different device (internal or external) is necessary for a better signal.
Standard of Care External Monitor
ACTIVE COMPARATORA standard external monitor will be placed throughout labor and delivery, unless a provider or investigator determines that an internal device is necessary for a better signal.
Interventions
External fetal heart rate monitoring
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Pregnant women ≥ 18 years of age; gestational age ≥ 37 weeks
- Singleton pregnancy.
- These women will be those presenting to Labor and Delivery for one of the following:
- Rule out labor
- Spontaneous labor
- Induction of labor
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years old; multiple gestation pregnancy; gestational age \< 37 weeks
- Fetal distress or vaginal bleeding prior to monitor placement
- Previous cesarean section
- Planned cesarean delivery.
- Women who are enrolled in the study but have less than 1 hour of fetal heart rate monitoring after randomization will be excluded from analysis.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Intermountain Health Care, Inc.lead
- GE Healthcarecollaborator
Study Sites (4)
Intermountain Medical Center
Murray, Utah, 84107, United States
McKay-Dee Hospital
Ogden, Utah, 84403, United States
Utah Valley Hospital
Provo, Utah, 84604, United States
LDS Hospital
Salt Lake City, Utah, 84143, United States
Related Publications (5)
Bakker PC, Colenbrander GJ, Verstraeten AA, Van Geijn HP. The quality of intrapartum fetal heart rate monitoring. Eur J Obstet Gynecol Reprod Biol. 2004 Sep 10;116(1):22-7. doi: 10.1016/j.ejogrb.2004.01.001.
PMID: 15294362BACKGROUNDCohen WR, Ommani S, Hassan S, Mirza FG, Solomon M, Brown R, Schifrin BS, Himsworth JM, Hayes-Gill BR. Accuracy and reliability of fetal heart rate monitoring using maternal abdominal surface electrodes. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2012 Nov;91(11):1306-13. doi: 10.1111/j.1600-0412.2012.01533.x. Epub 2012 Oct 19.
PMID: 22924738BACKGROUNDCohen WR, Hayes-Gill B. Influence of maternal body mass index on accuracy and reliability of external fetal monitoring techniques. Acta Obstet Gynecol Scand. 2014 Jun;93(6):590-5. doi: 10.1111/aogs.12387. Epub 2014 Apr 30.
PMID: 24684703BACKGROUNDDawes GS, Visser GH, Goodman JD, Redman CW. Numerical analysis of the human fetal heart rate: the quality of ultrasound records. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1981 Sep 1;141(1):43-52. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(81)90673-6.
PMID: 7270621BACKGROUNDRooth G, Huch A, Huch R (1987) FIGO news: guidelines for the use of fetal monitoring. Int J Gynaecol Obstet 25:159-167
BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Michael S Esplin, MD
Staff Physician
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SCREENING
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Division of Maternal Fetal Medicine
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 14, 2017
First Posted
May 17, 2017
Study Start
March 6, 2017
Primary Completion
June 28, 2017
Study Completion
June 28, 2017
Last Updated
November 1, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-10