Effect of Good Pain Management (GPM) Ward Program on Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain Patients
GPM
Evaluation of the Effect of Good Pain Management (GPM) Ward Program on Pattern of Care and Patient-Reported Outcomes of Moderate to Severe Cancer Pain Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
150
1 country
3
Brief Summary
This study aims to set up a standardized cancer pain ward - known as the Good Pain Management (GPM) Ward with streamlined assessment and management procedures to act as a pain management model. In particular, it will enforce regular pain assessment from and throughout hospital admission, and treatment protocols introducing the use of strong-opioids in moderate cancer pain patients, following National Cancer Care Network (NCCN) Adult Cancer Pain Guidelines. The GPM ward will be compared against current-practice controlled ward.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable cancer
Started Aug 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable cancer
3 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
August 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 14, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 29, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 29, 2019
CompletedMay 16, 2017
May 1, 2017
3 years
May 14, 2017
May 15, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain management index (PMI) assessment
The change of mean PMI score, pain-reporting rate and adequacy of pain treatment using pain management index
Up to 56 hours
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Satisfaction of pain control during admission
Up to 56 hours
Patient outcome questionnaire (APS-POQ) analysis
Up to 56 hours
SF-36 Questionnaire analysis
Up to 24 hours in screening period
Study Arms (2)
GPM Ward
EXPERIMENTALGood Pain management ward
Control Ward
ACTIVE COMPARATORCurrent practice controlled ward
Interventions
In the GPM ward, a close pain assessment will be carried within 1 hour after admission. After the assessment, patient will be given analgesic treatment as needed, by acceptable route, frequency and dosage. A good titration is required in GPM ward. Patient will be close monitor his/her pain level regarding pain score. In opioid use, when patient complains patient level ≥ 4, low dose strong opioids will be introduced in patient suffering with moderate pain. Compare with current practice, GPM ward will perform pain assessment with higher frequency for adjusting of analgesic medications if required.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Females and males aged ≥ 20
- Understand Chinese/Taiwanese and able to finish the questionnaire
- Alert enough to respond and understand
- Hospitalized for ≥ 24 hours
- ECOG ≤ 2
- Cancer patients with cancer-related pain
You may not qualify if:
- Patient diagnosed with non-cancer pain or unexplained pain
- Patient with moderate to severe mental disorder
- Patient receiving operation or invasive procedure within 24 hours before admission
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (3)
Kaohsiung Municipal Ta-Tung Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 80145, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 807, Taiwan
Kaohsiung Municipal Siaogang Hospital
Kaohsiung City, 812, Taiwan
Related Publications (12)
Kurita GP, Tange UB, Farholt H, Sonne NM, Stromgren AS, Ankersen L, Kristensen L, Bendixen L, Gronvold M, Petersen MA, Nordly M, Christrup L, Niemann C, Sjogren P. Pain characteristics and management of inpatients admitted to a comprehensive cancer centre: a cross-sectional study. Acta Anaesthesiol Scand. 2013 Apr;57(4):518-25. doi: 10.1111/aas.12068. Epub 2013 Jan 22.
PMID: 23336265BACKGROUNDSharma N, Hansen CH, O'Connor M, Thekkumpurath P, Walker J, Kleiboer A, Murray G, Espie C, Storey D, Sharpe M, Fleming L. Sleep problems in cancer patients: prevalence and association with distress and pain. Psychooncology. 2012 Sep;21(9):1003-9. doi: 10.1002/pon.2004. Epub 2011 Jul 1.
PMID: 21726015BACKGROUNDAmerican Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management; American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Practice guidelines for chronic pain management: an updated report by the American Society of Anesthesiologists Task Force on Chronic Pain Management and the American Society of Regional Anesthesia and Pain Medicine. Anesthesiology. 2010 Apr;112(4):810-33. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0b013e3181c43103. No abstract available.
PMID: 20124882BACKGROUNDRipamonti CI, Bandieri E, Roila F; ESMO Guidelines Working Group. Management of cancer pain: ESMO Clinical Practice Guidelines. Ann Oncol. 2011 Sep;22 Suppl 6:vi69-77. doi: 10.1093/annonc/mdr390. No abstract available.
PMID: 21908508BACKGROUNDNational Comprehensive Cancer Network. Adult cacner pain
BACKGROUNDTang ST, Tang WR, Liu TW, Lin CP, Chen JS. What really matters in pain management for terminally ill cancer patients in Taiwan. J Palliat Care. 2010 Autumn;26(3):151-8.
PMID: 21047037BACKGROUNDLiang SY, Li CC, Wu SF, Wang TJ, Tsay SL. The prevalence and impact of pain among Taiwanese oncology outpatients. Pain Manag Nurs. 2011 Dec;12(4):197-205. doi: 10.1016/j.pmn.2010.10.034. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
PMID: 22117751BACKGROUNDSeya MJ, Gelders SF, Achara OU, Milani B, Scholten WK. A first comparison between the consumption of and the need for opioid analgesics at country, regional, and global levels. J Pain Palliat Care Pharmacother. 2011;25(1):6-18. doi: 10.3109/15360288.2010.536307.
PMID: 21426212BACKGROUNDDuthey B, Scholten W. Adequacy of opioid analgesic consumption at country, global, and regional levels in 2010, its relationship with development level, and changes compared with 2006. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2014 Feb;47(2):283-97. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2013.03.015. Epub 2013 Jul 17.
PMID: 23870413BACKGROUNDPan HH, Ho ST, Lu CC, Wang JO, Lin TC, Wang KY. Trends in the consumption of opioid analgesics in Taiwan from 2002 to 2007: a population-based study. J Pain Symptom Manage. 2013 Feb;45(2):272-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpainsymman.2012.02.014. Epub 2012 Aug 11.
PMID: 22889859BACKGROUNDWang CH, Lee SY. Undertreatment of caner pain. Acta Anaesthesiol Taiwan. 2015 Jun;53(2):58-61. doi: 10.1016/j.aat.2015.05.005. Epub 2015 Jun 7.
PMID: 26063333BACKGROUNDSu WC, Chuang CH, Chen FM, Tsai HL, Huang CW, Chang TK, Hou MF, Wang JY. Effects of Good Pain Management (GPM) ward program on patterns of care and pain control in patients with cancer pain in Taiwan. Support Care Cancer. 2021 Apr;29(4):1903-1911. doi: 10.1007/s00520-020-05656-x. Epub 2020 Aug 15.
PMID: 32803728DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jaw-Yuan Wang, PhD
Kaohsiung Medical University Chung-Ho Memorial Hospital
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 14, 2017
First Posted
May 16, 2017
Study Start
August 30, 2016
Primary Completion
August 29, 2019
Study Completion
August 29, 2019
Last Updated
May 16, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05