Atomoxetine PBPK-PD Clinical Study
An Open-Label, Single- and Multi-Dose Study to Evaluate the Relationship Between the Pharmacokinetics, Pharmacodynamics, and Clinical Outcomes of Atomoxetine in CYP2D6 Extensive, Intermediate and Poor Metabolizers in Children With Attention Deficit/Hyperactivity Disorder
2 other identifiers
observational
51
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The primary aims of this study focus on characterizing the relationship between atomoxetine exposure and clinical outcomes, as assessed by standardized measures. We will also simultaneously monitor side effect of atomoxetine, another measure of clinical outcomes, and categorize study participants on their ability to tolerate atomoxetine.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for all trials
Started Dec 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 16, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
December 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 16, 2022
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
August 8, 2023
CompletedAugust 8, 2023
August 1, 2023
4.5 years
May 4, 2017
May 31, 2023
August 1, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (13)
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders to Intervention
Classification of participants as "responders" versus "non-responders" is based on percent reduction in total National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality (NICHQ) Vanderbilt Assessment Scale (3rd edition) score from baseline. Participants with ≥40% reduction in total score from baseline are classified as responders. The scale assesses the presence and severity of 18 DSM-V criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Symptoms are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale: 0 ("Never") to 3 ("Very Often"). Maximum total symptom score is 54.The measure includes 8 questions assessing functional impairment ("Performance"). Impairment is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale: 1 ("Excellent") to 5 ("Problematic").
6 weeks
Number of Participants Classified as Responders and Non-responders to Intervention
Classification of participants as "responders" versus "non-responders" is based on percent reduction in total National Initiative for Children's Healthcare Quality (NICHQ) Vanderbilt Assessment Scale (3rd edition) score from baseline. Participants with ≥40% reduction in total score from baseline are classified as responders. The scale assesses the presence and severity of 18 DSM-V criteria for attention deficit hyperactivity disorder (ADHD) symptoms. Symptoms are rated on a 4-point Likert-type scale: 0 ("Never") to 3 ("Very Often"). Maximum total symptom score is 54.The measure includes 8 questions assessing functional impairment ("Performance"). Impairment is rated on a 5-point Likert-type scale: 1 ("Excellent") to 5 ("Problematic").
18 weeks
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Atomoxetine
Cmax is the highest concentration of atomoxetine measured over a 12-hour period following administration of the drug on pharmacokinetic study days occurring at baseline (first dose). Cmax is an estimate of atomoxetine systemic exposure and is compared between responders and non-responders.
Baseline (first dose)
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Atomoxetine
Cmax is the highest concentration of atomoxetine measured following administration of the drug on pharmacokinetic study days occurring at 6 weeks. Cmax is an estimate of atomoxetine systemic exposure and is compared between responders and non-responders.
6 weeks
Maximum Plasma Concentration (Cmax) of Atomoxetine
Cmax is the highest concentration of atomoxetine measured following administration of the drug on pharmacokinetic study days occurring at 18 weeks. Cmax is an estimate of atomoxetine systemic exposure and is compared between responders and non-responders.
18 weeks
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Atomoxetine
AUC is the area under the plasma concentration-time curve following administration of atomoxetine. For the baseline pharmacokinetic study (first dose of atomoxetine) plasma concentrations were measured at 17 timepoints between 0 and 72 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, 24, 48, and 72 hours) post-dose for CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers, and 12 timepoints between 0 and 12 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours) after dose administration for all other participants. The AUC was generated using a mixed log-linear approach and extrapolated to infinity. AUC is compared between responders and non-responders.
Baseline (first dose)
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Atomoxetine
For the steady-state pharmacokinetic studies at 6 weeks, plasma concentrations were measured at 15 timepoints between 0 and 24 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours) post-dose for CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers, and at 12 timepoints between 0 and 12 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours) and extrapolated to 24 hours for all other participants. AUC is compared between responders and non-responders.
6 weeks
Area Under the Plasma Concentration-time Curve (AUC) of Atomoxetine
For the steady-state pharmacokinetic studies at 18 weeks, plasma concentrations were measured at 15 timepoints between 0 and 24 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, 12, 16, 20, and 24 hours) post-dose for CYP2D6 poor and intermediate metabolizers, and at 12 timepoints between 0 and 12 hours (0, 0.5, 0.75, 1, 1.5, 2, 3, 4, 6, 8, 10, and 12 hours) and extrapolated to 24 hours for all other participants. AUC is compared between responders and non-responders.
18 weeks
Plasma Concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)
DHPG has been proposed as a biomarker of the activity of the norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET; SLC6A2), the target of atomoxetine action. DHPG is a degradation product of norepinephrine after it has been taken up by pre-synaptic neurons, and higher concentrations in plasma are considered to reflect higher NET activity (higher reuptake of norepinephrine into pre-synaptic neurons). To assess the potential value of DHPG as a biomarker of atomoxetine response in ADHD, absolute baseline and pre-dose concentrations of DHPG will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
Baseline
Plasma Concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)
DHPG has been proposed as a biomarker of the activity of the norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET; SLC6A2), the target of atomoxetine action. DHPG is a degradation product of norepinephrine after it has been taken up by pre-synaptic neurons, and higher concentrations in plasma are considered to reflect higher NET activity (higher reuptake of norepinephrine into pre-synaptic neurons). To assess the potential value of DHPG as a biomarker of atomoxetine response in ADHD, pre-dose concentration of DHPG at the 6-week pharmacokinetic study visit will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
6 weeks
Plasma Concentration of 3,4-dihydroxyphenylglycol (DHPG)
DHPG has been proposed as a biomarker of the activity of the norepinephrine reuptake transporter (NET; SLC6A2), the target of atomoxetine action. DHPG is a degradation product of norepinephrine after it has been taken up by pre-synaptic neurons, and higher concentrations in plasma are considered to reflect higher NET activity (higher reuptake of norepinephrine into pre-synaptic neurons). To assess the potential value of DHPG as a biomarker of atomoxetine response in ADHD, pre-dose concentration of DHPG at the 18-week pharmacokinetic study visit will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
18 weeks
Change in Plasma Concentration of DHPG From Baseline
The change in DHPG will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
6 weeks
Change in Plasma Concentration of DHPG From Baseline
The change in DHPG will be compared between atomoxetine responders and non-responders.
18 weeks
Interventions
Atomoxetine dose adjusted to achieve pre-defined concentration
Eligibility Criteria
Males and females 6-18 years of age, with a diagnosis of ADHD.
You may qualify if:
- Diagnosis of ADHD, as confirmed by a Study Physician at intake visit.
- Intention of the Study Physician to begin therapy with ATX at intake visit
- Willing to provide written permission/assent to participate
- ADHD Medication Status is one of the following:
- ADHD medication naïve or not currently taking ADHD medication including stimulants, α2-agonists, and ATX, or
- Currently taking a stimulant for ADHD and is willing to wash out of stimulants prior to starting ATX. This washout is also approved by a Study Physician, or other qualified study personnel (see Section 11.0 for Procedures Involved).
You may not qualify if:
- An IQ \< 70
- A diagnosis of Autism Spectrum Disorder
- Inability or unwillingness to have blood drawn as described in the protocol schedule of events and consent
- Underlying risk for cardiotoxicity, such as presentation of structural cardiac abnormalities, cardiomyopathy, or arrhythmias
- Clinically significant abnormal safety laboratory values as determined by treating physician
- Diagnosis that may cause abnormal absorption or gastric emptying, such as reflux, inflammatory bowel disease, or Crohn's disease
- For females, a positive urine pregnancy test
- Previous history of adverse drug reaction to ATX
- Use of drugs known to inhibit CYP2D6:
- Concurrent therapy with sertraline, venlafaxine, imipramine, nortriptyline, quinidine, propafenone, cimetidine, tamoxifen, bupropion, over-the-counter medications containing diphenhydramine, codeine, tramadol, hydrocodone, or oxycodone
- Concurrent or previous therapy with fluoxetine or paroxetine in the last 2 months
- Concurrent or previous therapy with terbinafine in the last 6 months
- Unwillingness or inability to washout of stimulant ADHD medications
- Concurrent or recent use of other psychiatric/behavioral health drugs including SSRIs, SNRIs, antipsychotics, anxiolytics, anti-epileptics, and α2-agonists that would impact the participant's pharmacokinetic and/or pharmacodynamic baseline
- Subject is considered by PI to be unsuitable for participation in the study for any reason
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Children's Mercy Hospital and Clinics
Kansas City, Missouri, 64108, United States
Related Publications (10)
Newcorn JH, Sutton VK, Weiss MD, Sumner CR. Clinical responses to atomoxetine in attention-deficit/hyperactivity disorder: the Integrated Data Exploratory Analysis (IDEA) study. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2009 May;48(5):511-518. doi: 10.1097/CHI.0b013e31819c55b2.
PMID: 19318988BACKGROUNDSeneca N, Gulyas B, Varrone A, Schou M, Airaksinen A, Tauscher J, Vandenhende F, Kielbasa W, Farde L, Innis RB, Halldin C. Atomoxetine occupies the norepinephrine transporter in a dose-dependent fashion: a PET study in nonhuman primate brain using (S,S)-[18F]FMeNER-D2. Psychopharmacology (Berl). 2006 Sep;188(1):119-27. doi: 10.1007/s00213-006-0483-3. Epub 2006 Aug 4.
PMID: 16896954BACKGROUNDMichelson D, Read HA, Ruff DD, Witcher J, Zhang S, McCracken J. CYP2D6 and clinical response to atomoxetine in children and adolescents with ADHD. J Am Acad Child Adolesc Psychiatry. 2007 Feb;46(2):242-51. doi: 10.1097/01.chi.0000246056.83791.b6.
PMID: 17242628BACKGROUNDKim CH, Hahn MK, Joung Y, Anderson SL, Steele AH, Mazei-Robinson MS, Gizer I, Teicher MH, Cohen BM, Robertson D, Waldman ID, Blakely RD, Kim KS. A polymorphism in the norepinephrine transporter gene alters promoter activity and is associated with attention-deficit hyperactivity disorder. Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2006 Dec 12;103(50):19164-9. doi: 10.1073/pnas.0510836103. Epub 2006 Dec 4.
PMID: 17146058BACKGROUNDGaedigk A, Twist GP, Leeder JS. CYP2D6, SULT1A1 and UGT2B17 copy number variation: quantitative detection by multiplex PCR. Pharmacogenomics. 2012 Jan;13(1):91-111. doi: 10.2217/pgs.11.135. Epub 2011 Nov 23.
PMID: 22111604BACKGROUNDGaedigk A, Simon SD, Pearce RE, Bradford LD, Kennedy MJ, Leeder JS. The CYP2D6 activity score: translating genotype information into a qualitative measure of phenotype. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2008 Feb;83(2):234-42. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100406. Epub 2007 Oct 31.
PMID: 17971818BACKGROUNDGaedigk A, Ndjountche L, Divakaran K, Dianne Bradford L, Zineh I, Oberlander TF, Brousseau DC, McCarver DG, Johnson JA, Alander SW, Wayne Riggs K, Steven Leeder J. Cytochrome P4502D6 (CYP2D6) gene locus heterogeneity: characterization of gene duplication events. Clin Pharmacol Ther. 2007 Feb;81(2):242-51. doi: 10.1038/sj.clpt.6100033.
PMID: 17259947BACKGROUNDGaedigk A, Jaime LK, Bertino JS Jr, Berard A, Pratt VM, Bradfordand LD, Leeder JS. Identification of Novel CYP2D7-2D6 Hybrids: Non-Functional and Functional Variants. Front Pharmacol. 2010 Oct 4;1:121. doi: 10.3389/fphar.2010.00121. eCollection 2010.
PMID: 21833166BACKGROUNDGaedigk A, Fuhr U, Johnson C, Berard LA, Bradford D, Leeder JS. CYP2D7-2D6 hybrid tandems: identification of novel CYP2D6 duplication arrangements and implications for phenotype prediction. Pharmacogenomics. 2010 Jan;11(1):43-53. doi: 10.2217/pgs.09.133.
PMID: 20017671BACKGROUNDGaedigk A. Complexities of CYP2D6 gene analysis and interpretation. Int Rev Psychiatry. 2013 Oct;25(5):534-53. doi: 10.3109/09540261.2013.825581.
PMID: 24151800BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
Recruitment was severely affected by the COVID-19 pandemic, and did not recover as hospital operations adapted to the pandemic. Therefore, study was terminated before enrollment goal was met.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- James Steven Leeder, PharmD, PhD
- Organization
- Children's Mercy Hospital
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James S Leeder, PharmD, PhD
Children's Mercy Hospital Kansas City
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Deputy Director, Children's Mercy Research Institute
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2017
First Posted
May 16, 2017
Study Start
December 12, 2017
Primary Completion
June 1, 2022
Study Completion
June 16, 2022
Last Updated
August 8, 2023
Results First Posted
August 8, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-08