A Randomized Controlled Trial Comparing Non-ischemic to Ischemic Preservation in Adult Cardiac Transplantation
NIHP
1 other identifier
interventional
47
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The overall aim of this proposal is to compare a new state-of-the-art ex-vivo organ preservation method with standard ischemic cold static storage of donor hearts in adult cardiac transplantation. Standard heart preservation before transplantation consists of cold ischemic storage of the heart. Clinical studies has shown that the morbidity and mortality risk increases with extension of the allograft ischemic time over four hours. For each additional hour the mortality risk increase with 25% the first year. This time constrained is costly and results in severe logistical problems, leading to loss of transplantable organs. Initially the study is prospective, single-institution, open-label, non-randomised trial comparing the NIHP method with the conventionally SCS in adult heart transplanted patients at Skane University Hospital, Lund, Sweden. Six patients will be transplanted using the non-ischemic hypothermic cardioplegic perfusion. These will be compared with contemporary control patients transplanted with standard ischemic cold static storage. The results will be analysed and reported. After the initially six patients have been completed, the study will become a single center, prospective, open, blinded endpoint, randomized, controlled clinical trial including 34 patients. The primary end-point is a composite of mortality, primary graft dysfunction (PGD), need for extra corporal support, or acute cellular rejection (ACR) within 30- days post-transplant. PGD and ACR will be accessed blinded.An improved preservation of the transplanted organ will reduce the major limitations for survival in the early post-transplant period such as non-specific graft failure and acute rejection. Furthermore, it will make it possible to increase the donor pool.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 12, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2020
CompletedApril 28, 2021
April 1, 2021
3.3 years
May 8, 2017
April 26, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Short-term graft failure
The Primary End-Point is defined as a composite endpoint of patient death due to graft failure, re-transplantation due to graft failure, severe primary graft dysfunction (PGD), need for extra corporal mechanical support such as ECMO within 7 days post transplantation, or acute cellular rejection (ACR) ≥ grade 2. PGD grading is done according to the International Society of Heart and Lung Transplantation guidelines. ACR assessment is based on post-transplant myocardial biopsy information and standard clinical evaluation.
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Long-term graft failure
Within 12-months post-transplantation
Ischemia and reperfusion injury
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Ischemia and reperfusion injury
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Other Outcomes (10)
Postoperative renal function
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Postoperative liver function
Within 30-days post-transplantation
Length of Stay
Within 12-months post-transplantation
- +7 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Non-ischemic preservation.
EXPERIMENTALNon-ischemic hypothermic perfusion (NIHP): The device, a portable heart-lung machine, is continous/intermittent perfused the heart with a new preservation solution at a temperature of 8°C.
Standard ischemic storage.
OTHERIschemic cold static storage: a crystalloid solution (cardioplegia) is used to stop and preserve the heart. The heart is storage i a transport box containing ice to keep the temperature around 8°C.
Interventions
The device is a portable heart-lung machine; an automatic pressure and flow-controlled perfusion system. The heart is submerged in a solution and the medium is circulated in the heart, at a temperature of 8°C.
Standard ischemic cold static storage; a crystalloid solution (cardioplegia) is used to stop and preserve the heart. Cardioplegia is given. The heart is storage i a transport box containing ice to keep the temperature around 8°C.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age ≥18 years
- Listed for heart transplantation
- Signed informed consent form
You may not qualify if:
- Previous solid organ or bone marrow transplantation
- or more previous sternotomies
- known malignancy
- kidney failure (estimated creatinine clearness, GFR \<30)
- liver failure (ASAT, ALAT or total Bilirubin) \> 5 times upper limit of normal, or INR \>2.0,
- ongoing septicemia
- systemic inflammatory disorders treated with corticosteroids
- not able to understand Swedish
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Region Skanelead
Study Sites (1)
Skane University Hospital
Lund, Skåne County, 22185, Sweden
Related Publications (9)
Nilsson J, Ohlsson M, Hoglund P, Ekmehag B, Koul B, Andersson B. The International Heart Transplant Survival Algorithm (IHTSA): a new model to improve organ sharing and survival. PLoS One. 2015 Mar 11;10(3):e0118644. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0118644. eCollection 2015.
PMID: 25760647BACKGROUNDMesser S, Ardehali A, Tsui S. Normothermic donor heart perfusion: current clinical experience and the future. Transpl Int. 2015 Jun;28(6):634-42. doi: 10.1111/tri.12361. Epub 2014 Jul 7.
PMID: 24853906BACKGROUNDSteen S, Paskevicius A, Liao Q, Sjoberg T. Safe orthotopic transplantation of hearts harvested 24 hours after brain death and preserved for 24 hours. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016 Jun;50(3):193-200. doi: 10.3109/14017431.2016.1154598. Epub 2016 Apr 4.
PMID: 26882241BACKGROUNDJernryd V, Metzsch C, Andersson B, Nilsson J. Organ Preservation and Reperfusion Influence on Outcome after Heart Transplantation. The Journal of Heart and Lung Transplantation , Volume 35 , Issue 4 , S193
BACKGROUNDZhou L, Zang G, Zhang G, Wang H, Zhang X, Johnston N, Min W, Luke P, Jevnikar A, Haig A, Zheng X. MicroRNA and mRNA signatures in ischemia reperfusion injury in heart transplantation. PLoS One. 2013 Nov 20;8(11):e79805. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0079805. eCollection 2013.
PMID: 24278182BACKGROUNDArdehali A, Esmailian F, Deng M, Soltesz E, Hsich E, Naka Y, Mancini D, Camacho M, Zucker M, Leprince P, Padera R, Kobashigawa J; PROCEED II trial investigators. Ex-vivo perfusion of donor hearts for human heart transplantation (PROCEED II): a prospective, open-label, multicentre, randomised non-inferiority trial. Lancet. 2015 Jun 27;385(9987):2577-84. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(15)60261-6. Epub 2015 Apr 14.
PMID: 25888086BACKGROUNDQin G, Sjoberg T, Liao Q, Sun X, Steen S. Intact endothelial and contractile function of coronary artery after 8 hours of heart preservation. Scand Cardiovasc J. 2016 Oct-Dec;50(5-6):362-366. doi: 10.1080/14017431.2016.1213876. Epub 2016 Aug 3.
PMID: 27420646BACKGROUNDEltzschig HK, Eckle T. Ischemia and reperfusion--from mechanism to translation. Nat Med. 2011 Nov 7;17(11):1391-401. doi: 10.1038/nm.2507.
PMID: 22064429BACKGROUNDNilsson J, Jernryd V, Qin G, Paskevicius A, Metzsch C, Sjoberg T, Steen S. A nonrandomized open-label phase 2 trial of nonischemic heart preservation for human heart transplantation. Nat Commun. 2020 Jun 12;11(1):2976. doi: 10.1038/s41467-020-16782-9.
PMID: 32532991RESULT
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Johan Nilsson, MD, PhD
Lund University and Skåne University Hospital
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- PGD and ACR assessment will be performed by a blinded access
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 8, 2017
First Posted
May 12, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2020
Study Completion
June 30, 2020
Last Updated
April 28, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share