Extracorporal Shock Wave Treatment to Improve Nerve Regeneration
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
2
Brief Summary
This study evaluates the impact of extracorporeal shock wave treatment after microsurgical coaptation of finger nerves. Participants will be randomized into two treatment groups with different settings and a sham group. The participants will thereafter followed-up in a prospective, double-blind study design.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 18, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
April 1, 2023
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 1, 2023
CompletedSeptember 5, 2021
September 1, 2021
6 years
April 21, 2017
September 3, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Two Point Discrimination
Two Point Discrimination distal of the nerve lesion in mm
1 year
Semmes Weinstein Monofilament test
Palpable Monofilaments, measured in Newton
1 year
Pain/Discomfort
0=Hinders function 1=Disturbing 2=Moderate 3=None/minor
1 year
hyperesthesia
0=Hinders function 1=Disturbing 2=Moderate 3=None/minor
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Tinel Hoffmann sign
1 year
Sonography
1 year
velocity of nerve conduction
1 year
Medical Research Council Grading of Sensibility
1 year
Study Arms (3)
Sham
SHAM COMPARATORShockwave 300 pulses
ACTIVE COMPARATOR300 pulses of extracorporeal shock wave will be applied
Shockwave 500 pulses
ACTIVE COMPARATOR500 pulses of extracorporeal shock wave will be applied
Interventions
300 or 500 pulses, frequency 3Hz, energy 1 (0,1mJ/mm2)
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- complete lossless transection of one or more digital nerves distal to the branching out of the commune median or ulnar nerves
- direct, tension-free coaptation of the nerve stumps
You may not qualify if:
- segment loss of the nerve
- tension after direct coaptation
- diabetic neuropathy or other peripheral neuropathies
- other disease with reduced sensibility of the fingers
- injuries in the course of the nerve (plexus brachialis, median or ulnar nerve)
- chronic inflammatory disease
- rheumatoid arthritis
- pregnancy
- patients not able to give written consent
- patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker
- patients which are sensitive to electromagnetic radiance
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Meidling Trauma Hospital
Vienna, 1120, Austria
Lorenz Böhler Trauma Hospital
Vienna, 1200, Austria
Related Publications (13)
Bosch G, Lin YL, van Schie HT, van De Lest CH, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the biochemical composition and metabolic activity of tenocytes in normal tendinous structures in ponies. Equine Vet J. 2007 May;39(3):226-31. doi: 10.2746/042516407x180408.
PMID: 17520973BACKGROUNDCorson MA, James NL, Latta SE, Nerem RM, Berk BC, Harrison DG. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1996 Nov;79(5):984-91. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.5.984.
PMID: 8888690BACKGROUNDFleming I, Bauersachs J, Fisslthaler B, Busse R. Ca2+-independent activation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors and fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1998 Apr 6;82(6):686-95. doi: 10.1161/01.res.82.6.686.
PMID: 9546377BACKGROUNDFukumoto Y, Ito A, Uwatoku T, Matoba T, Kishi T, Tanaka H, Takeshita A, Sunagawa K, Shimokawa H. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy ameliorates myocardial ischemia in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis. 2006 Feb;17(1):63-70. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200602000-00011.
PMID: 16374144BACKGROUNDHausdorf J, Sievers B, Schmitt-Sody M, Jansson V, Maier M, Mayer-Wagner S. Stimulation of bone growth factor synthesis in human osteoblasts and fibroblasts after extracorporeal shock wave application. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Mar;131(3):303-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1166-4. Epub 2010 Aug 22.
PMID: 20730589BACKGROUNDMartini L, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Torricelli P, de Pretto M, Schaden W, Giardino R. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on osteoblastlike cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):269-80. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000073344.50837.cd.
PMID: 12897619BACKGROUNDMoretti B, Notarnicola A, Garofalo R, Moretti L, Patella S, Marlinghaus E, Patella V. Shock waves in the treatment of stress fractures. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jun;35(6):1042-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Feb 25.
PMID: 19243882BACKGROUNDMoretti B, Notarnicola A, Maggio G, Moretti L, Pascone M, Tafuri S, Patella V. The management of neuropathic ulcers of the foot in diabetes by shock wave therapy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 May 27;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-54.
PMID: 19473538BACKGROUNDMurata R, Nakagawa K, Ohtori S, Ochiai N, Arai M, Saisu T, Sasho T, Takahashi K, Moriya H. The effects of radial shock waves on gene transfer in rabbit chondrocytes in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Nov;15(11):1275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 29.
PMID: 17537650BACKGROUNDNishida T, Shimokawa H, Oi K, Tatewaki H, Uwatoku T, Abe K, Matsumoto Y, Kajihara N, Eto M, Matsuda T, Yasui H, Takeshita A, Sunagawa K. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy markedly ameliorates ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction in pigs in vivo. Circulation. 2004 Nov 9;110(19):3055-61. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148849.51177.97. Epub 2004 Nov 1.
PMID: 15520304BACKGROUNDSchaden W, Fischer A, Sailler A. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy of nonunion or delayed osseous union. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jun;(387):90-4. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200106000-00012.
PMID: 11400900BACKGROUNDSchaden W, Thiele R, Kolpl C, Pusch M, Nissan A, Attinger CE, Maniscalco-Theberge ME, Peoples GE, Elster EA, Stojadinovic A. Shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: a feasibility study. J Surg Res. 2007 Nov;143(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Sep 27.
PMID: 17904157BACKGROUNDZimpfer D, Aharinejad S, Holfeld J, Thomas A, Dumfarth J, Rosenhek R, Czerny M, Schaden W, Gmeiner M, Wolner E, Grimm M. Direct epicardial shock wave therapy improves ventricular function and induces angiogenesis in ischemic heart failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Apr;137(4):963-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.006.
PMID: 19327525BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The participant will be wearing an acoustic and visual masking. The outcome assessor won't know if the participant was treated or if he was assigned to the sham group.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2017
First Posted
May 10, 2017
Study Start
April 18, 2017
Primary Completion
April 1, 2023
Study Completion
June 1, 2023
Last Updated
September 5, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share