NCT03147313

Brief Summary

This study evaluates the impact of extracorporeal shock wave treatment after microsurgical coaptation of finger nerves. Participants will be randomized into two treatment groups with different settings and a sham group. The participants will thereafter followed-up in a prospective, double-blind study design.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
60

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

2 active sites

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 18, 2017

Completed
3 days until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 21, 2017

Completed
19 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 10, 2017

Completed
5.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 1, 2023

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2023

Completed
Last Updated

September 5, 2021

Status Verified

September 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

6 years

First QC Date

April 21, 2017

Last Update Submit

September 3, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

extracorporeal shock wavemicrosurgical nerve coaptationnerve regeneration

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Two Point Discrimination

    Two Point Discrimination distal of the nerve lesion in mm

    1 year

  • Semmes Weinstein Monofilament test

    Palpable Monofilaments, measured in Newton

    1 year

  • Pain/Discomfort

    0=Hinders function 1=Disturbing 2=Moderate 3=None/minor

    1 year

  • hyperesthesia

    0=Hinders function 1=Disturbing 2=Moderate 3=None/minor

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Tinel Hoffmann sign

    1 year

  • Sonography

    1 year

  • velocity of nerve conduction

    1 year

  • Medical Research Council Grading of Sensibility

    1 year

Study Arms (3)

Sham

SHAM COMPARATOR
Device: Sham

Shockwave 300 pulses

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

300 pulses of extracorporeal shock wave will be applied

Device: MTS Medical UG Orthogold 100

Shockwave 500 pulses

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

500 pulses of extracorporeal shock wave will be applied

Device: MTS Medical UG Orthogold 100

Interventions

300 or 500 pulses, frequency 3Hz, energy 1 (0,1mJ/mm2)

Shockwave 300 pulsesShockwave 500 pulses
ShamDEVICE

Extracorporeal shock wave treatment will be faked.

Sham

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 60 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64)

You may qualify if:

  • complete lossless transection of one or more digital nerves distal to the branching out of the commune median or ulnar nerves
  • direct, tension-free coaptation of the nerve stumps

You may not qualify if:

  • segment loss of the nerve
  • tension after direct coaptation
  • diabetic neuropathy or other peripheral neuropathies
  • other disease with reduced sensibility of the fingers
  • injuries in the course of the nerve (plexus brachialis, median or ulnar nerve)
  • chronic inflammatory disease
  • rheumatoid arthritis
  • pregnancy
  • patients not able to give written consent
  • patients with an implantable cardiac defibrillator or pacemaker
  • patients which are sensitive to electromagnetic radiance

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (2)

Meidling Trauma Hospital

Vienna, 1120, Austria

RECRUITING

Lorenz Böhler Trauma Hospital

Vienna, 1200, Austria

RECRUITING

Related Publications (13)

  • Bosch G, Lin YL, van Schie HT, van De Lest CH, Barneveld A, van Weeren PR. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on the biochemical composition and metabolic activity of tenocytes in normal tendinous structures in ponies. Equine Vet J. 2007 May;39(3):226-31. doi: 10.2746/042516407x180408.

    PMID: 17520973BACKGROUND
  • Corson MA, James NL, Latta SE, Nerem RM, Berk BC, Harrison DG. Phosphorylation of endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1996 Nov;79(5):984-91. doi: 10.1161/01.res.79.5.984.

    PMID: 8888690BACKGROUND
  • Fleming I, Bauersachs J, Fisslthaler B, Busse R. Ca2+-independent activation of the endothelial nitric oxide synthase in response to tyrosine phosphatase inhibitors and fluid shear stress. Circ Res. 1998 Apr 6;82(6):686-95. doi: 10.1161/01.res.82.6.686.

    PMID: 9546377BACKGROUND
  • Fukumoto Y, Ito A, Uwatoku T, Matoba T, Kishi T, Tanaka H, Takeshita A, Sunagawa K, Shimokawa H. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy ameliorates myocardial ischemia in patients with severe coronary artery disease. Coron Artery Dis. 2006 Feb;17(1):63-70. doi: 10.1097/00019501-200602000-00011.

    PMID: 16374144BACKGROUND
  • Hausdorf J, Sievers B, Schmitt-Sody M, Jansson V, Maier M, Mayer-Wagner S. Stimulation of bone growth factor synthesis in human osteoblasts and fibroblasts after extracorporeal shock wave application. Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2011 Mar;131(3):303-9. doi: 10.1007/s00402-010-1166-4. Epub 2010 Aug 22.

    PMID: 20730589BACKGROUND
  • Martini L, Giavaresi G, Fini M, Torricelli P, de Pretto M, Schaden W, Giardino R. Effect of extracorporeal shock wave therapy on osteoblastlike cells. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2003 Aug;(413):269-80. doi: 10.1097/01.blo.0000073344.50837.cd.

    PMID: 12897619BACKGROUND
  • Moretti B, Notarnicola A, Garofalo R, Moretti L, Patella S, Marlinghaus E, Patella V. Shock waves in the treatment of stress fractures. Ultrasound Med Biol. 2009 Jun;35(6):1042-9. doi: 10.1016/j.ultrasmedbio.2008.12.002. Epub 2009 Feb 25.

    PMID: 19243882BACKGROUND
  • Moretti B, Notarnicola A, Maggio G, Moretti L, Pascone M, Tafuri S, Patella V. The management of neuropathic ulcers of the foot in diabetes by shock wave therapy. BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2009 May 27;10:54. doi: 10.1186/1471-2474-10-54.

    PMID: 19473538BACKGROUND
  • Murata R, Nakagawa K, Ohtori S, Ochiai N, Arai M, Saisu T, Sasho T, Takahashi K, Moriya H. The effects of radial shock waves on gene transfer in rabbit chondrocytes in vitro. Osteoarthritis Cartilage. 2007 Nov;15(11):1275-82. doi: 10.1016/j.joca.2007.04.001. Epub 2007 May 29.

    PMID: 17537650BACKGROUND
  • Nishida T, Shimokawa H, Oi K, Tatewaki H, Uwatoku T, Abe K, Matsumoto Y, Kajihara N, Eto M, Matsuda T, Yasui H, Takeshita A, Sunagawa K. Extracorporeal cardiac shock wave therapy markedly ameliorates ischemia-induced myocardial dysfunction in pigs in vivo. Circulation. 2004 Nov 9;110(19):3055-61. doi: 10.1161/01.CIR.0000148849.51177.97. Epub 2004 Nov 1.

    PMID: 15520304BACKGROUND
  • Schaden W, Fischer A, Sailler A. Extracorporeal shock wave therapy of nonunion or delayed osseous union. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2001 Jun;(387):90-4. doi: 10.1097/00003086-200106000-00012.

    PMID: 11400900BACKGROUND
  • Schaden W, Thiele R, Kolpl C, Pusch M, Nissan A, Attinger CE, Maniscalco-Theberge ME, Peoples GE, Elster EA, Stojadinovic A. Shock wave therapy for acute and chronic soft tissue wounds: a feasibility study. J Surg Res. 2007 Nov;143(1):1-12. doi: 10.1016/j.jss.2007.01.009. Epub 2007 Sep 27.

    PMID: 17904157BACKGROUND
  • Zimpfer D, Aharinejad S, Holfeld J, Thomas A, Dumfarth J, Rosenhek R, Czerny M, Schaden W, Gmeiner M, Wolner E, Grimm M. Direct epicardial shock wave therapy improves ventricular function and induces angiogenesis in ischemic heart failure. J Thorac Cardiovasc Surg. 2009 Apr;137(4):963-70. doi: 10.1016/j.jtcvs.2008.11.006.

    PMID: 19327525BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Peripheral Nerve Injuries

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Peripheral Nervous System DiseasesNeuromuscular DiseasesNervous System DiseasesTrauma, Nervous SystemWounds and Injuries

Central Study Contacts

Rudolf Rosenauer, M.D.

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The participant will be wearing an acoustic and visual masking. The outcome assessor won't know if the participant was treated or if he was assigned to the sham group.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Participants will be randomized into three groups: Two treatment groups with different treatment settings and one sham group.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2017

First Posted

May 10, 2017

Study Start

April 18, 2017

Primary Completion

April 1, 2023

Study Completion

June 1, 2023

Last Updated

September 5, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-09

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations