Does 3D Visualisation Improve Performance of Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy by Junior Surgeons?
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC) is currently the most commonly performed major abdominal surgery in Western countries. Ever since the introduction of laparoscopic surgery in the late 1980s, cholecystectomies are now routinely performed laparoscopically; concomitantly the introduction and refinement of other laparoscopic abdominal surgeries have rapidly progressed due to the early experience and safety profile seen in LC. The introduction of stereoscopes which allow for 3D visual feedback has been postulated to overcome setbacks encountered in conventional 2-dimensional (2D) laparoscopic surgery. Since its introduction in the mid-2000s, 3D visualisation has been proven to be advantageous over 2D visualisation, especially so within the context of training junior surgeons in controlled, experimental settings. The body of evidence on benefits of 3D visualisation within the clinical setting, i.e. when applied on live patients in operating theatres, remains small and weak. The previous publications however did not extrapolate any potential benefits on patients' well-being in correlation to their reported benefits and neither did they explore any potential benefits in reducing operative complications. We decided to embark on a study to investigate any peri-operative advantage conferred on junior surgeons in performing LC using 3D visualisation as the majority of LCs in Sibu Hospital are carried out by junior surgeons.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
April 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 30, 2017
CompletedJanuary 26, 2018
January 1, 2018
6 months
May 4, 2017
January 25, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Complication rate
Intraoperative complications : Gallbladder perforation, adjacent organ injury, uncontrolled bleeding Post-operative : pain score, length of hospital stay, readmission, mortality
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Operative Time
6 months
Conversion to open cholecystectomy
6 months
Study Arms (2)
3D laparoscopic cholecystectomy
EXPERIMENTALLaparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed under 3D visualisation.
2D laparoscopic cholecystectomy
NO INTERVENTIONLaparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed under 2D visualisation, the standard viewing method used during all laparoscopic surgeries currently.
Interventions
Laparoscopic cholecystectomy will be performed under 3D visualization as opposed to 2D visualization (conventional method). 3D supposedly provide sharper view with better depth perception and therefore might lead to reduce complication rates.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All adult patients scheduled to undergo elective LC
You may not qualify if:
- Patients below 18 years-old
- Patients who declined to join the study
- Patients with contraindications to undergo laparoscopic surgery (e.g. congestive cardiac failure, severe respiratory disease, uncorrected coagulopathy)
- Patients with acute cholecystitis, gallbladder neck adherent to main biliary tree or dense omental adhesion to gallbladder
- Patients with gallbladder tumour (suspected or confirmed)
- Patients with variant biliary anatomy
- Patients who had defaulted follow-up
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sibu Hospital
Sibu, Sarawak, 96000, Malaysia
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Chan Hooi Chea, MS
Ministry of Health, Malaysia
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Doctor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 4, 2017
First Posted
May 8, 2017
Study Start
April 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 30, 2017
Study Completion
September 30, 2017
Last Updated
January 26, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share