Spinal Marginally Hyperbaric Ropivacaine for Cesarean Delivery
Spinal Ropivacaine for Cesarean Delivery: A Comparison of Commonly Hyperbaric and Marginally Hyperbaric Solutions
1 other identifier
interventional
120
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
BACKGROUND: One previous study has confirmed that the marginally hyperbaric solutions of bupivacaine can maintain good quality of anesthesia and get a more steadily hemodynamic status than commonly hyperbaric solutions, some authors confirmed the plain ropivacaine for cesarean section have a higher failure rate and commonly hyperbaric solutions of ropivacaine have a higher incidence of side reaction. It is unclear what the efficacy of spinal marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine for elective cesarean delivery.We hypothesized that the marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine will get a similar efficacy to commonly hyperbaric solutions but a more steadily hemodynamic status. OBJECTIVE In this prospective, randomized, double-blinded study, Investigator will compare the clinical efficacy and adverse effect of spinal anesthesia with commonly hyperbaric and marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine for elective cesarean delivery. Main outcome measures: The maximum cephalad sensory block level; the change of continuous cerebral oxygen desaturation (ScO2) over time; the incidence of hypotension and nausea and vomiting; the change of invasive arterial pressure; the consumption of ephedrine; the incidence of shivering; the onset time to T8 dermatome; the quality of anesthesia (efficacy of motor block and sensory block)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
May 3, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2017
CompletedMay 9, 2017
May 1, 2017
4 months
May 3, 2017
May 5, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The maximum cephalad sensory block level
The highest cephalad sensory block level is determined by pinprick along both sides of the midclavicular line.
During 50 min post spinal injection
Secondary Outcomes (2)
The incidence of hypotension
During 50 min post spinal injection
The change rate of invasive arterial pressure
During 15 min post spinal injection
Study Arms (2)
commonly hyperbaric ropivacaine group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis group will receive spinal anesthesia with commonly hyperbaric ropivacaine solution,which was made by adding 50% glucose to the plain ropivacaine commercially availablethe to make it's density is close to commonly hyperbaric bupivacaine.
marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine group
EXPERIMENTALThis group will receive spinal anesthesia with marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine,which was made by adding 5% glucose to the plain ropivacaine commercially availablethe to make it's density is slightly denser than cerebrospinal fluid but much less denser than commonly hyperbaric bupivacaine/ropivacaine.
Interventions
We change the density of ropivacaine solution to make it into an marginally hyperbaric state or into an commonly hyperbaric state.and we hypothesized that the marginally hyperbaric ropivacaine will get a similar efficacy to commonly hyperbaric solutions but a more steadily hemodynamic status.
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- They had dysfunctional coagulation; had pregnancy-induced hypertension; or had infection around the anesthesia puncture site; or multiple pregnancies, suspected fetal abnormality, and if the gestational age of the infant was less than 36 weeks.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (2)
Tang WX, Li JJ, Bu HM, Fu ZJ. Spinal anaesthesia with low-dose bupivacaine in marginally hyperbaric solutions for caesarean section: A randomised controlled trial. Eur J Anaesthesiol. 2015 Jul;32(7):493-8. doi: 10.1097/EJA.0000000000000112.
PMID: 25032943BACKGROUNDKhaw KS, Ngan Kee WD, Wong M, Ng F, Lee A. Spinal ropivacaine for cesarean delivery: a comparison of hyperbaric and plain solutions. Anesth Analg. 2002 Mar;94(3):680-5; table of contents. doi: 10.1097/00000539-200203000-00037.
PMID: 11867397BACKGROUND
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
May 3, 2017
First Posted
May 8, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2017
Study Completion
November 1, 2017
Last Updated
May 9, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share