NCT03139019

Brief Summary

The relative effectiveness of incentives based on process (e.g. medication adherence) vs. outcome (improvements in blood pressure) is unknown, leading to the key research question: Which approach is more effective? The incentive structure for this initiative is based on best practices in the use of process and outcome measures to address this fundamental question. A series of incentive designs will be conducted to examine the relative effectiveness of equivalent value incentives based on process (e.g. attending smoking cessation counseling sessions), outcomes (e.g. quitting smoking), or a combination of process and outcomes incentives (e.g. attending smoking cessation counseling sessions and quitting smoking). This will also provide an overarching framework for assessing the relative importance of process versus outcome incentives in different contexts and for different populations.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
596

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2014

Typical duration for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2014

Completed
1.4 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

October 12, 2015

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 1, 2016

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 3, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Status Verified

May 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

2.5 years

First QC Date

October 12, 2015

Last Update Submit

May 1, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

Diabetes preventionWeight lossLifestyle change

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Process measure: measurement of activities related to diabetes prevention (attending DPP class attendance

    Number of completed education sessions in a16-week DPP program

    During a 16 week program once enrolled

  • Outcome measure: Measure of decrease in weight loss across 16 weeks

    Weight loss during program.

    During a 16 week period once enrolled

Study Arms (4)

Process incentives

EXPERIMENTAL

Process incentives participants will receive incentives based on visit attendance in the YMCA DPP session. This incentive will be $ 15 for attending each session.

Behavioral: Process incentives

Outcome incentives

EXPERIMENTAL

Outcome incentives participants will be weighed at 8 and 16 weeks after the program starts and if they have lost 2.5% of their body weight at each time point then they will receive $100 and $140 respectively.

Behavioral: Outcome incentives

Process and Outcome incentives

EXPERIMENTAL

If assigned to the Process and Outcome arm participants will be informed that they can earn additional incentives for attending DPP classes and losing weight. Participants in this arm can earn $7.50 per DPP class (max 16) and $50 and $70 for achieving 2.5% weight loss at 8 and 16 weeks respectively.

Behavioral: Process and Outcome incentives

Control arm

NO INTERVENTION

If assigned to the Control arm participants will not be eligible for any additional incentives and will just learn the goals of the DPP program itself.

Interventions

Participants will receive cash based incentives for achieving process based measures (class attendance).

Process incentives

Participants will receive cash based incentives for outcome based measures (weight loss).

Outcome incentives

Participants will receive cash based incentives for both achieving process based measures (class attendance) and outcome based measures (weight loss).

Process and Outcome incentives

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • years or older
  • Have been diagnosed as pre-diabetic or high risk for diabetes
  • Had a HbA1c test in the last year and if not are willing to get one now
  • Medicaid enrolled in NYS

You may not qualify if:

  • none

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

NYS Department of Health

Albany, New York, 12201, United States

Location

Related Publications (37)

  • NYS Medicaid Complete Plan Enrollment, 2010

    BACKGROUND
  • NCQA Patient-Centered Medical Home 2011 Overview. Accessed April 20, 2011. http://www.ncqa.org/tabid/631/default.aspx

    BACKGROUND
  • Office of the Governor Press Release "Governor Cuomo Accepts Recommendations from the Medicaid Redesign Team." February 24, 2011 http://www.governor.ny.gov/press/022411cuomoaccepts_medicaidredesignteam

    BACKGROUND
  • U.S. Census 2010

    BACKGROUND
  • 2010 New York State Managed care Plan Enrollment: A report on managed care enrollment by health plan and county. New York State Department of Health

    BACKGROUND
  • 2009 Medicaid Claims data

    BACKGROUND
  • State Health Facts. Kaiser Family Foundation. Accessed March 28, 2011 http://www.statehealthfacts.org/profileind.jsp?ind=177&cat=4&rgn=34

    BACKGROUND
  • NYS DOH Prevention Quality Indicators. Accessed April 26, 2011. https://apps.nyhealth.gov/statistics/prevention/quality_indicators/start.map;jsessionid=87AA57B85B9BAF52A09F024D8D784077

    BACKGROUND
  • American Legacy Foundation. Saving Lives, Saving Money II: Tobacco-free states spend less on Medicaid. November 2007. Accessed March 28, 2011

    BACKGROUND
  • eQARR Quality Assurance Reporting Requirements New York State. Accessed April 4, 2011. http://www.health.state.ny.us/health_care/managed_care/reports/eqarr/2008/statewide/medicaid/managing_cardiovascular_respiratory_conditions.htm

    BACKGROUND
  • National High Blood Pressure Education Program. The Seventh Report of the Joint National Committee on Prevention, Detection, Evaluation, and Treatment of High Blood Pressure. Bethesda (MD): National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (US); 2004 Aug. Report No.: 04-5230. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK9630/

    PMID: 20821851BACKGROUND
  • UnitedHealth Center for Health Reform and Modernization. "The United State of Diabetes: Challenges and opportunities in the decade ahead." Working Paper 5 November 2010.

    BACKGROUND
  • New York State Tobacco Control Program. Leading the way toward a tobacco-free society 2010-2013

    BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 2006

    BACKGROUND
  • A guide to the New York State Clean Indoor Air Act. NYS DOH. Access March 28, 2011 http://www.health.state.ny.us/publications/3402/index.htm

    BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System, 2009

    BACKGROUND
  • Heil SH, Higgins ST, Bernstein IM, Solomon LJ, Rogers RE, Thomas CS, Badger GJ, Lynch ME. Effects of voucher-based incentives on abstinence from cigarette smoking and fetal growth among pregnant women. Addiction. 2008 Jun;103(6):1009-18. doi: 10.1111/j.1360-0443.2008.02237.x.

    PMID: 18482424BACKGROUND
  • Liu F. Quit attempts and intention to quit cigarette smoking among Medicaid recipients in the USA. Public Health. 2010 Oct;124(10):553-8. doi: 10.1016/j.puhe.2010.05.015. Epub 2010 Sep 15.

    PMID: 20832833BACKGROUND
  • McMenamin SB, Halpin HA, Bellows NM. Knowledge of Medicaid coverage and effectiveness of smoking treatments. Am J Prev Med. 2006 Nov;31(5):369-74. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2006.07.015. Epub 2006 Sep 25.

    PMID: 17046407BACKGROUND
  • Centers for Disease Control and Prevention. Leading Causes of Deaths. Accessed March 29, 2011 http://www.cdc.gov/nchs/fastats/lcod.htm

    BACKGROUND
  • NYS (county level) Data Source: NYS Department of Health, Expanded Behavioral Risk Factor Surveillance System (Expanded BRFSS), http://www.nyhealth.gov/statistics/brfss/expanded/. 2008-2009

    BACKGROUND
  • Elzubier AG, Husain AA, Suleiman IA, Hamid ZA. Drug compliance among hypertensive patients in Kassala, eastern Sudan. East Mediterr Health J. 2000 Jan;6(1):100-5.

    PMID: 11370321BACKGROUND
  • Shaya FT, Du D, Gbarayor CM, Frech-Tamas F, Lau H, Weir MR. Predictors of compliance with antihypertensive therapy in a high-risk medicaid population. J Natl Med Assoc. 2009 Jan;101(1):34-9. doi: 10.1016/s0027-9684(15)30808-7.

    PMID: 19245070BACKGROUND
  • Ormond BA, Spillman BC, Waidmann TA, Caswell KJ, Tereshchenko B. Potential national and state medical care savings from primary disease prevention. Am J Public Health. 2011 Jan;101(1):157-64. doi: 10.2105/AJPH.2009.182287. Epub 2010 Nov 18.

    PMID: 21088270BACKGROUND
  • National Diabetes Information Clearing House Accessed March 30, 2011 http://diabetes.niddk.nih.gov/dm/pubs/statistics/#dud

    BACKGROUND
  • U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. The Guide to Clinical Preventive Services 2010 - 2011: Recommendations of the U.S. Preventive Services Task Force. Rockville (MD): Agency for Healthcare Research and Quality (US); 2010 Aug. Report No.: 10-05145. Available from http://www.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/books/NBK56707/

    PMID: 21850778BACKGROUND
  • Knowler WC, Barrett-Connor E, Fowler SE, Hamman RF, Lachin JM, Walker EA, Nathan DM; Diabetes Prevention Program Research Group. Reduction in the incidence of type 2 diabetes with lifestyle intervention or metformin. N Engl J Med. 2002 Feb 7;346(6):393-403. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa012512.

    PMID: 11832527BACKGROUND
  • Hamman RF, Wing RR, Edelstein SL, Lachin JM, Bray GA, Delahanty L, Hoskin M, Kriska AM, Mayer-Davis EJ, Pi-Sunyer X, Regensteiner J, Venditti B, Wylie-Rosett J. Effect of weight loss with lifestyle intervention on risk of diabetes. Diabetes Care. 2006 Sep;29(9):2102-7. doi: 10.2337/dc06-0560.

    PMID: 16936160BACKGROUND
  • Ackermann RT, Finch EA, Brizendine E, Zhou H, Marrero DG. Translating the Diabetes Prevention Program into the community. The DEPLOY Pilot Study. Am J Prev Med. 2008 Oct;35(4):357-63. doi: 10.1016/j.amepre.2008.06.035.

    PMID: 18779029BACKGROUND
  • Amundson HA, Butcher MK, Gohdes D, Hall TO, Harwell TS, Helgerson SD, Vanderwood KK; Montana Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Prevention Program Workgroup. Translating the diabetes prevention program into practice in the general community: findings from the Montana Cardiovascular Disease and Diabetes Prevention Program. Diabetes Educ. 2009 Mar-Apr;35(2):209-10, 213-4, 216-20 passim. doi: 10.1177/0145721709333269.

    PMID: 19321807BACKGROUND
  • Sjostrom CD, Lissner L, Wedel H, Sjostrom L. Reduction in incidence of diabetes, hypertension and lipid disturbances after intentional weight loss induced by bariatric surgery: the SOS Intervention Study. Obes Res. 1999 Sep;7(5):477-84. doi: 10.1002/j.1550-8528.1999.tb00436.x.

    PMID: 10509605BACKGROUND
  • Volpp KG, Loewenstein G, Troxel AB, Doshi J, Price M, Laskin M, Kimmel SE. A test of financial incentives to improve warfarin adherence. BMC Health Serv Res. 2008 Dec 23;8:272. doi: 10.1186/1472-6963-8-272.

    PMID: 19102784BACKGROUND
  • Volpp KG, John LK, Troxel AB, Norton L, Fassbender J, Loewenstein G. Financial incentive-based approaches for weight loss: a randomized trial. JAMA. 2008 Dec 10;300(22):2631-7. doi: 10.1001/jama.2008.804.

    PMID: 19066383BACKGROUND
  • Volpp KG, Pauly MV, Loewenstein G, Bangsberg D. P4P4P: an agenda for research on pay-for-performance for patients. Health Aff (Millwood). 2009 Jan-Feb;28(1):206-14. doi: 10.1377/hlthaff.28.1.206.

    PMID: 19124872BACKGROUND
  • Balamurugan A, Ohsfeldt R, Hughes T, Phillips M. Diabetes self-management education program for Medicaid recipients: a continuous quality improvement process. Diabetes Educ. 2006 Nov-Dec;32(6):893-900. doi: 10.1177/0145721706294787.

    PMID: 17102156BACKGROUND
  • Norris SL, Engelgau MM, Narayan KM. Effectiveness of self-management training in type 2 diabetes: a systematic review of randomized controlled trials. Diabetes Care. 2001 Mar;24(3):561-87. doi: 10.2337/diacare.24.3.561.

    PMID: 11289485BACKGROUND
  • Chin JY, Matson J, McCauley S, Anarella J, Gesten F, Roohan P. The impact of financial incentives on utilization and outcomes of diabetes prevention programs among Medicaid managed care adults in New York state. Contemp Clin Trials. 2020 Apr;91:105960. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2020.105960. Epub 2020 Feb 19.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Weight Loss

Interventions

Microscopy, Electron, Scanning Transmission

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Body Weight ChangesBody WeightSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Microscopy, Electron, TransmissionMicroscopy, ElectronMicroscopyDiagnostic ImagingDiagnostic Techniques and ProceduresDiagnosisInvestigative Techniques

Study Officials

  • Kevin Volpp, MD, PhD

    University of Pennsylvania

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

October 12, 2015

First Posted

May 3, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2014

Primary Completion

December 1, 2016

Study Completion

December 1, 2016

Last Updated

May 3, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-05

Locations