Study Stopped
Poor recruiting and transfer of the PI to another center
Erector Spinae Plane Block Versus Paravertebral Block During Non-intubated Thoracoscopic Lung Resections.
PABATS
Pain Blocks in Awake Thoracic Surgery: A Randomized Prospective Trial to Test the Non-inferiority of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in Comparison With Paravertebral Block During Non-intubate, Thoracoscopic Lung Resection.
1 other identifier
interventional
7
1 country
1
Brief Summary
A randomized prospective trial to test the non-inferiority of Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB) in comparison with paravertebral block during non-intubated thoracoscopic lung resection
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Feb 2019
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 28, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 3, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
February 22, 2019
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 22, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 22, 2021
CompletedMay 11, 2022
May 1, 2022
2.8 years
April 28, 2017
May 5, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Dose Escalation of systemic anesthetics during the procedure
Percentage of patients who need sedation escalation
1 hour from the end of the procedure
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Post operative pain perception
8, 16, 24 hours from the end of procedure
Post operative pain management
8, 16, 24 hours from the end of procedure
Study Arms (2)
Paravertebral block (PVB)
ACTIVE COMPARATORIntraoperative pain management 1. Sedation Continuous monitoring of sedation with bispectral index. Sedation is achieved with propofol 1% (target bispectral index: 50-70), plus on-demand remifentanyl (50 mcg/ml in TCI, dose target Cet 2-8 ng/ml). 2. Paravertebral Block Post operative pain management * Continuous infusion of Tramadol 200 mg or Ketorolac 60 mg * Rescue analgesia with Morphine (0.1 mg/kg) a single time every 24 hours, and/or Tramadol 100 mg up to three times every 24 hours and/ or Ketorolac 30 mg up to three times every 24 hours
Erector Spinae Plane Block (ESPB)
EXPERIMENTALIntraoperative pain management 1. Sedation Continuous monitoring of sedation with bispectral index. Sedation is achieved with propofol 1% (target bispectral index: 50-70), plus on-demand remifentanyl (50 mcg/ml in TCI, dose target Cet 2-8 ng/ml). 2. Erector Spinae Plane Block Post operative pain management * Continuous infusion of Tramadol 200 mg or Ketorolac 60 mg * Rescue analgesia with Morphine (0.1 mg/kg) a single time every 24 hours, and/or Tramadol 100 mg up to three times every 24 hours and/ or Ketorolac 30 mg up to three times every 24 hours
Interventions
PVB consists in the injection of low concentration Ropivacaine (30 ml, 0.3%) in the paravertebral space (defined by the anterior aspect of the ribs, the vertebral body and the parietal pleura. The space is identified under ultrasonographic guidance by a dedicated Anesthesiologist.
ESPB consists in the injection of low concentration Ropivacaine (30 ml, 0.3%), in the anatomical plane between the Erector Spinae muscles and deeper surface of Rhomboid muscle. The space is identified under ecographic guidance, laterally to the spinous process of T5. The diffusion of the anesthetic solution along the space can be echographically appreciated.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Wedge Resection of pulmonary nodules performed with a two-portal or three-portal VATS approach.
- Peripheral (within 3 cm from the surface of the inflated lung) nodules, less than 2 cm in diameter.
- Acceptance of awake VATS with written informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Age \< 18 years
- Patients who are pregnant or lactating
- Morbid obesity (BMI \> 35 )
- Inability to understand and sign the Informed consent
- Proven allergy to local anesthetic drugs as required by this protocol
- Expected pleural adhesions (previous thoracic trauma, previous pleuro-pulmonary infection, redo surgery on the affected side)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Sacro Cuore - Don Calabria Hospital
Negrar, Verona, 37024, Italy
Related Publications (6)
Pompeo E, Mineo D, Rogliani P, Sabato AF, Mineo TC. Feasibility and results of awake thoracoscopic resection of solitary pulmonary nodules. Ann Thorac Surg. 2004 Nov;78(5):1761-8. doi: 10.1016/j.athoracsur.2004.05.083.
PMID: 15511470BACKGROUNDHung MH, Hsu HH, Chan KC, Chen KC, Yie JC, Cheng YJ, Chen JS. Non-intubated thoracoscopic surgery using internal intercostal nerve block, vagal block and targeted sedation. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2014 Oct;46(4):620-5. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezu054. Epub 2014 Feb 28.
PMID: 24585550BACKGROUNDLiu J, Cui F, Pompeo E, Gonzalez-Rivas D, Chen H, Yin W, Shao W, Li S, Pan H, Shen J, Hamblin L, He J. The impact of non-intubated versus intubated anaesthesia on early outcomes of video-assisted thoracoscopic anatomical resection in non-small-cell lung cancer: a propensity score matching analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Nov;50(5):920-925. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw160. Epub 2016 May 10.
PMID: 27165771BACKGROUNDBroseta AM, Errando C, De Andres J, Diaz-Cambronero O, Ortega-Monzo J. Serratus plane block: the regional analgesia technique for thoracoscopy? Anaesthesia. 2015 Nov;70(11):1329-30. doi: 10.1111/anae.13263. No abstract available.
PMID: 26449303BACKGROUNDForero M, Adhikary SD, Lopez H, Tsui C, Chin KJ. The Erector Spinae Plane Block: A Novel Analgesic Technique in Thoracic Neuropathic Pain. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Sep-Oct;41(5):621-7. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000451.
PMID: 27501016BACKGROUNDScarfe AJ, Schuhmann-Hingel S, Duncan JK, Ma N, Atukorale YN, Cameron AL. Continuous paravertebral block for post-cardiothoracic surgery analgesia: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2016 Dec;50(6):1010-1018. doi: 10.1093/ejcts/ezw168. Epub 2016 May 30.
PMID: 27242357BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER
- Masking Details
- Partecipant masking: Both blocks are performed on the area between the scapula and the vertebral column, employing the same materials, so that the patient is masked about which block is going to be performed. Care providers: once the block has been performed, a different anesthesiologist will take care of the patient during the procedure, eventually providing dose escalation in systemic analgesic drugs (primary end point). Surgeons performing the procedure are unaware of the type of block. Staff nurses managing post operative pain in terms of both recording (Numeric Rating Scale) and soothing (rescue analgesia distribution) are unaware of the type of block (secondary end points).
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 28, 2017
First Posted
May 3, 2017
Study Start
February 22, 2019
Primary Completion
November 22, 2021
Study Completion
November 22, 2021
Last Updated
May 11, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share