Effects of Autogenic and Reciprocal Inhibition, Muscle Energy Techniques in the Management of Mechanical Neck Pain

NCT03136250 | Completed DMC

• 1 other identifier: FUI/CTR/2017/1
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 78
• Locations: 1 country
• Sites: 1

Brief Summary

Neck pain is among the most common musculoskeletal disorders worldwide and is an important public health issue in terms of personal wellbeing. Prevalence of neck pain show excessive variations, with a point prevalence varying between 6% and 22%, and one year prevalence ranging between 1.5-75%. Neck pain like all other mechanical disorders leads to pain, disability and decreased range of motion (ROM). Stretching is a very common exercise performed by sportsmen, elderly, in physical therapy and rehabilitation patients, thus practiced in all sorts of fitness programs. The major types of stretching included in the literature are static, dynamic and pre-contraction stretching; of which static stretching is the conventional type of stretching. The different types of pre-contraction stretching include Proprioceptive Neuromuscular Facilitation (PNF) stretching, Post Isometric Relaxation (PIR), Post Facilitation stretch (PFS) and Active Isolated Stretch (AIS). Pre-contraction stretching is also considered a part of Muscle Energy Technique (MET). Recently MET and pre-contraction stretching have been shown to have significant superiority over conventional stretching in management of mechanical neck pain, but the evidence is currently lacking regarding which of the two pre-contraction stretching protocols, namely autogenic and reciprocal inhibition is more effective than the other. A RCT will be conducted in order to find and compare the effectiveness of conventional stretching and pre-contraction stretching (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition). One Control group (conventional group) and two Experimental groups (Experimental Group A - Autogenic Inhibition \& Experimental Group B - Reciprocal Inhibition) will be formed. The participants will be recruited in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria using consecutive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and randomized into the three respective groups. All the groups will receive the gold standard treatment for chronic neck pain including mobilization and modalities. In addition to the gold standard treatment the participants will receive specific stretching protocol based on their interventional group

Conditions

Neck Pain

Keywords

Muscle Energy Techniques; Autogenic Inhibition; Reciprocal Inhibition; Stretching; Range of Motion; Muscle Strength; VAS; Neck Disability Index; NDI

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

• Pain (Numeric Pain Rating Scale) - Change is being assessed

  To measure the pre and post patient's perception of pain

  Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)

• Cervical Range of Motion (CROM) - Change is being assessed

  To measure patient's improvement in cervical range of motion

  Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)

• Neck Disability Index (NDI) - Change is being assessed

  to measure patient's pre and post functional disability

  Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)

• Cervical Isometric Muscle Strength (Modified Sphygmomanometer dynamometry) - Change is being assessed

  To measure patient's improvement in Isometric Muscle Strength

  Pre-treatment (First day before treatment), Immediate Follow Up (After 1st treatment session) & Follow Up (After 5 days of Treatment)

Study Arms (3)

Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching)

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

(Control Group - Static Stretching + Standard Treatment)

Other: Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching + Standard Treatment)

Group B (Autogenic Inhibition MET)

EXPERIMENTAL

(Autogenic Inhibition - PIR + Standard treatment)

Other: Group B (Autogenic Inhibition - PIR + Standard treatment)

Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition MET)

EXPERIMENTAL

(Reciprocal Inhibition - RI + Standard treatment)

Other: Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition - RI + Standard treatment)

Interventions

Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching + Standard Treatment) OTHER

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Conventional Static Stretching 15-30 seconds hold 3-5 repetitions (Page P, 2012) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid, Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles.

Group A (Control Group - Static Stretching)

Group B (Autogenic Inhibition - PIR + Standard treatment) OTHER

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Post Isometric Relaxation MET (3-5 reps) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid, Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles. (Chaitow L, 2006)

Group B (Autogenic Inhibition MET)

Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition - RI + Standard treatment) OTHER

o Conventional Gold Standard treatment (Manual Therapy + Modalities) Reciprocal Inhibition MET (3-5 reps) for Ant/Middle/Posterior Scaleni, Sternocleidomastoid,Levator Scapulae and Upper Trapezius Muscles (Chaitow L, 2006)

Group C (Reciprocal Inhibition MET)

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 70 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• Age 18 to 70 years;
• Neck pain on NPRS 4 to 8 (moderate cases);
• Subacute or chronic cases (4 to 12 weeks).
• Decreased or painful Cervical range of motion (CROM)

You may not qualify if:

• Signs of serious pathology (e.g., malignancy, inflammatory disorder, infection);
• History of cervical spine surgery in previous 12 months;
• History of trauma or fractures in cervical spine;
• Signs of cervical radiculopathy or myelopathy; and
• Vascular syndromes such as VBI

Sponsors & Collaborators

• Foundation University Islamabad: lead

Study Sites (1)

Foundation University Institute of Rehabilitation Sciences

Islamabad, Pakistan

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Neck Pain

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Pain; Neurologic Manifestations; Signs and Symptoms; Pathological Conditions, Signs and Symptoms

Study Officials

• Muhammad Osama, DPT, MS-OMPT, CHPE

  Foundation University Islamabad

  PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: TRIPLE
• Who Masked: PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
• Masking Details: The participant, investigator and outcome assessor are not aware of which treatment group the participant/patient is placed in.
• Purpose: TREATMENT
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: SPONSOR

Model Details: A randomized Controlled trial will be conducted in order to find and compare the effectiveness of conventional stretching and MET stretching (autogenic inhibition and reciprocal inhibition). One Control group (conventional group) and two Experimental groups (Experimental Group A - Autogenic Inhibition \& Experimental Group B - Reciprocal Inhibition) will be formed. The participants will be recruited in the study if they meet the inclusion criteria using consecutive sampling from Fauji Foundation Hospital and randomized into the three respective groups. All the groups will receive the gold standard treatment for chronic neck pain including mobilization and modalities. In addition to the gold standard treatment the participants will receive specific stretching protocol based on their interventional group.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 10, 2017
• First Posted: May 2, 2017
• Study Start: April 11, 2017
• Primary Completion: November 30, 2017
• Study Completion: December 30, 2017
• Last Updated: February 8, 2018

Record last verified: 2017-12

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share

Locations

PA (1)