NCT03136224

Brief Summary

Since circumcision is a significant workload for surgeons working at the rural state hospitals in Turkey, the use of circumcision techniques that are easy to implement and have low complications is becoming widespread. In this study, thermocautery, plastic clamping, and conventional (open surgical) circumcision techniques were compared to each other in terms of their short and long term complications.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
2,062

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2014

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 1, 2014

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

May 1, 2014

Completed
1 year until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

May 1, 2015

Completed
2 years until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 23, 2017

Completed
9 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 2, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

May 2, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

Same day

First QC Date

April 23, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 26, 2017

Conditions

Keywords

circumcisionThermocauteryClampSurgical Circumcision

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Complication rate

    The diversity in circumcision techniques is because of the search for a more practical, cheaper, safer, and less complicated technique. In this study, complications of circumcisions performed by pediatric surgeon specialists by using three different techniques (thermocautery, alisklamp, and surgical circumcision) in two different hospitals in Turkey were investigated retrospectively.

    May 2014 and May 2015 (circumcised in 1 year period)

Secondary Outcomes (1)

  • Surgical processing time

    May 2014 and May 2015 (circumcised in 1 year period)

Study Arms (3)

Thermocautery

EXPERIMENTAL

In the thermocautery method, a digital thermocautery device (Thermo-Med TM 802-B, Thermo Medikal, Adana, Turkey) with 6 different temperature settings was used. Circumcision was performed in the same way as the surgical circumcision. Only cutting and bleeding intervention was done by using a thermocautery device. Cutting was performed by making the appropriate heat adjustment according to the age of the child and the thickness of the glans. Hemorrhage control was performed with a thermocautery device and then the skin-mucosa integrity was ensured by using a 5/0 absorbable suture

Device: Thermocautery

Plastic Clamping

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Alisklamp (Alisklamp, Abagrup Health Services Ltd, Ankara, Turkey) was used in the plastic clamp technique. The clamp size was chosen according to the diameter of the penis of the patient. The clamp was inserted into the glans and then the skin and the mucosa were pulled to the appropriate size and clamped. The skin and mucosa were excised from the distal part of the clamp with the aid of a lancet. After the operation, the clamp was removed on the 4th day

Device: Plastic Clamping

Surgical Circumcision

SHAM COMPARATOR

In classical surgical circumcision, foreskin was hung up with the clamp. The outer skin and secondly the mucosa was cut by using scissors. Following the hemorrhage intervention, the skin-mucosa integrity was sutured by using the 5/0 absorbable suture. Medical dressing was done.

Device: Surgical Circumcision

Interventions

Also known as: Experimental
Thermocautery
Also known as: Active comparator, Alisklamp
Plastic Clamping
Also known as: sham comparator
Surgical Circumcision

Eligibility Criteria

Age1 Week - 18 Years
Sexmale
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64)

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Ahmet Ali Tuncer, Asst Prof Dr

    Afyon Kocatepe University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
NON RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Statistician was masked
Purpose
OTHER
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Thermocautery group Plastic clamping group Classic (Surgical) circumcision group
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Asst Prof Dr

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 23, 2017

First Posted

May 2, 2017

Study Start

May 1, 2014

Primary Completion

May 1, 2014

Study Completion

May 1, 2015

Last Updated

May 2, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share