Determination of the Sun Protection Factor (SPF) of a Cosmetic Daily De-fence Skin Cream
1 other identifier
interventional
26
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to determine the SPF of the test product according to the International Standards Organization (ISO) 24444:2010 methodology (In vivo determination of the SPF).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 27, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 2, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 30, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 30, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
April 19, 2019
CompletedApril 19, 2019
January 1, 2019
1 month
April 27, 2017
June 12, 2018
January 15, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Arithmetic Mean of Individual Sun Protection Factor (SPFi) Value
Arithmetical mean of all valid SPFi values of each product on each participant was calculated from the individual Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) on product treated (MEDp) test sites in relation to unprotected (MEDu) test sites 16-24 hours after exposure to ultraviolet (UV) radiation (SPFi = MEDp/MEDu). The Minimal Erythemal Dose (MED) was defined as the lowest dose of UV radiation that produced the first perceptible unambiguous erythema with defined borders appearing over most of the field of UV exposure, 16 to 24 hours after UV exposure. No inferential statistical analysis has been performed for this outcome. Test and reference products achieved a 95% CI of ±16.4% and ±16.6% of the mean SPF. These data meet the statistical criterion defined in ISO 24444:2010 as the 95% CI is within ±17% of the mean SPF.
Up to 24 hours post UV exposure
Study Arms (3)
Test product
EXPERIMENTALThis arm will include all the test sites on the participants back where test product (Physiogel Daily Defence Protective Day Cream Light) will be applied.
Reference product
ACTIVE COMPARATORThis arm will include all the test sites on the participants back where reference product (ISO 24444:2010 P3 standard sunscreen) will be applied.
Negative control
NO INTERVENTIONThis arm will include all the test sites on the participants back which will be left unprotected.
Interventions
Investigator controlled, topical application to the epidermis at a dose of 2 milligrams per square centimeter (mg/cm2). Single application.
Investigator controlled, topical application to the epidermis at a dose of 2 mg/cm2. Single application.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Demonstrates understanding of the study procedures, restrictions and willingness to participate as evidenced by voluntary written informed consent and has received a signed and dated copy of the informed consent form
- Good general and mental health with, in the opinion of the investigator or medically qualified designee no clinically significant and relevant abnormalities in medical history or upon physical examination
- Subjects with a Fitzpatrick Skin Type of I, II or III
- Subjects with an Individual typological angle (ITA°) greater than 28°
You may not qualify if:
- Women who are known to be pregnant or who are intending to become pregnant over the duration of the study
- Women who are breast-feeding or lactating
- Subjects having used medication with known photo-toxic and/or photosensitizing potential (e.g. hypericum perforatum, antibiotics, blood pressure regulating agents) up to 14 days prior to screening
- Subjects with a history of systemic therapy with anti-inflammatory agents or analgesics (e.g. diclofenac) up to 3 days prior to screening
- Subjects with dermatological conditions
- Subjects with a history of abnormal response to the sun
- Subjects who are tanned or have had sun exposure on the back area in the previous 4 weeks prior to screening
- Subjects having marks, blemishes or nevi or presenting existing sun damage in the test area
- Subjects having excessive hair, moles, tattoos, scars or other imperfections in the test area that could influence the investigation
- Subjects with a history of systemic therapy with immuno-suppressive drugs (e.g. corticosteroids) and/or antihistamines (e.g. anti-allergics) up to 7 days prior to screening
- Subjects with a non-uniform skin colour or hyperpigmentation in the test area
- Subjects with a medical history of dysplastic nevi or melanoma
- Subjects with one of the following illnesses that might require regular systemic medication: Insulin-dependent diabetes, cancer
- Subjects with asthma, unless medicated
- Subjects with an electronic implant (e.g. pace maker, insulin pump, hearing aid) that cannot be removed during irradiation
- +12 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- GlaxoSmithKlinelead
Study Sites (1)
GSK Investigational Site
Schenefeld, Schleswig-Holstein, 22869, Germany
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- GSK Response Center
- Organization
- GlaxoSmithKline
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline
- STUDY DIRECTOR
GSK Clinical Trials
GlaxoSmithKline (for GlaxoSmithKline; Human Genome Sciences Inc., a GSK Company; Sirtris, a GSK Company; Stiefel, a GSK Company; ViiV Healthcare)
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The trained grader responsible for assessing Minimal Erythemal Dose of unprotected skin (MEDu) and Minimal Erythemal Dose of product treated (MEDp) at Visit 5 will be blinded to the product allocation of subjects. The trained grader responsible for assessing the provisional MEDu at Visit 3 will, necessarily, not be blinded since only one test site will be exposed to Ultraviolet (UV) radiation.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 27, 2017
First Posted
May 2, 2017
Study Start
May 30, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2017
Study Completion
June 30, 2017
Last Updated
April 19, 2019
Results First Posted
April 19, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share