NCT03135340

Brief Summary

Wide-awake hand surgery with local anesthetic, no tourniquet and no sedation (WALANT) is increasingly utilized. Conventional anesthesia for hand surgery involves a patient with a block, unable to perform motor function in the arm, and with patient either intubated or sedated, unable to follow surgeon instructions intra-operatively. Flexor tendon repair with a wide awake and cooperative patient is routinely performed successfully at some centres. This method provides several potential benefits including being able to have the patient actively flex the digit and visualize the repair site to assess for any tendon gapping at the repair site, ensure adequate approximation, gliding and absence of triggering. There have not been any prospectively collected randomized controlled trials comparing wide awake vs. regional/general anesthesia in flexor tendon repair. The purpose of our study is to assess for differences in early outcomes including stiffness, patient satisfaction and early complications in wide-awake anesthesia when compared to general/regional anesthesia for flexor tendon repair in zones I and II. Our hypothesis is that there is a lower complication rate and better outcomes when using wide-awake flexor tendon repair.

Trial Health

65
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
88

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
91mo left

Started Aug 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Status
not yet recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress54%
Aug 2017Nov 2033

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 6, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

May 1, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

August 1, 2017

Completed
1.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

November 1, 2018

Completed
15 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2033

Expected
Last Updated

July 17, 2017

Status Verified

April 1, 2017

Enrollment Period

1.3 years

First QC Date

December 6, 2016

Last Update Submit

July 12, 2017

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Complication rate

    Infection requiring antibiotics, tendon rupture, stiffness or contracture requiring tenolysis

    1 year

Secondary Outcomes (7)

  • Total active range of motion

    1 year

  • Strickland Criteria Score

    1 year

  • Pain of procedure by visual analogue scale (VAS)

    1 week

  • Pain of procedure by pain diary

    1 week

  • Subjective anxiety

    1 week

  • +2 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

WALANT

EXPERIMENTAL

These patients will receive local anesthetic for flexor tendon repair injected directly into the operative site on the hand. The local anesthetic used 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

Procedure: WALANTDrug: WALANT Injection

General/regional anesthesia

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

These patients will receive general/regional anesthesia for flexor tendon repair. This is ropivacaine 0.5% injected by an anesthetist under image-guidance in the axillary region of the arm. If the regional anesthesia is not functioning at the time of OR, this is converted to a general anesthetic as per standard protocol.

Procedure: General/regional anesthesiaDrug: Regional Anesthetic Injection

Interventions

WALANTPROCEDURE

These patients will receive local anesthetic for flexor tendon repair injected directly into the operative site on the hand. The local anesthetic used 1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine.

WALANT

These patients will receive general/regional anesthesia for flexor tendon repair. This is ropivacaine 0.5% injected by an anesthetist under image-guidance in the axillary region of the arm. If the regional anesthesia is not functioning at the time of OR, this is converted to a general anesthetic as per standard protocol.

General/regional anesthesia

1% lidocaine with 1:100,000 epinephrine injected directly into operative site. The typical quantity is 5-10cc aliquots.

WALANT

0.5% ropivacaine injected under ultrasound guidance into the axilla. The typical quantity is 30-40cc aliquots.

General/regional anesthesia

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • over the age of 18
  • acute single or multiple digit complete flexor tendon lacerations in zones I or II presenting to attending physicians who agree to participate in the study.

You may not qualify if:

  • gross wound contamination
  • segmental tendon loss
  • associated finger fractures
  • sub-acute or chronic ruptures (ruptures \> 6 weeks old)
  • active or previous infection in the wound bed
  • requirement of delayed repair
  • complex or multisystem injuries
  • multiple digit injuries
  • significant joint injuries
  • amputations (replants)
  • mangled hand injuries.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Related Publications (13)

  • Verdan CE. Half a century of flexor-tendon surgery. Current status and changing philosophies. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 1972 Apr;54(3):472-91. No abstract available.

    PMID: 4560071BACKGROUND
  • Saldana MJ, Chow JA, Gerbino P 2nd, Westerbeck P, Schacherer TG. Further experience in rehabilitation of zone II flexor tendon repair with dynamic traction splinting. Plast Reconstr Surg. 1991 Mar;87(3):543-6. doi: 10.1097/00006534-199103000-00023.

    PMID: 1998024BACKGROUND
  • Lilly SI, Messer TM. Complications after treatment of flexor tendon injuries. J Am Acad Orthop Surg. 2006 Jul;14(7):387-96. doi: 10.5435/00124635-200607000-00001.

    PMID: 16822886BACKGROUND
  • Wilhelmi BJ, Blackwell SJ, Miller J, Mancoll JS, Phillips LG. Epinephrine in digital blocks: revisited. Ann Plast Surg. 1998 Oct;41(4):410-4. doi: 10.1097/00000637-199810000-00010.

    PMID: 9788222BACKGROUND
  • Denkler K. A comprehensive review of epinephrine in the finger: to do or not to do. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2001 Jul;108(1):114-24. doi: 10.1097/00006534-200107000-00017.

    PMID: 11420511BACKGROUND
  • Nodwell T, Lalonde D. How long does it take phentolamine to reverse adrenaline-induced vasoconstriction in the finger and hand? A prospective, randomized, blinded study: The Dalhousie project experimental phase. Can J Plast Surg. 2003 Winter;11(4):187-90. doi: 10.1177/229255030301100408.

    PMID: 24009436BACKGROUND
  • Higgins A, Lalonde DH, Bell M, McKee D, Lalonde JF. Avoiding flexor tendon repair rupture with intraoperative total active movement examination. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Sep;126(3):941-945. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181e60489.

    PMID: 20463621BACKGROUND
  • Lalonde DH. Wide-awake flexor tendon repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2009 Feb;123(2):623-625. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e318195664c. No abstract available.

    PMID: 19182622BACKGROUND
  • Lalonde DH. An evidence-based approach to flexor tendon laceration repair. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2011 Feb;127(2):885-890. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e31820467b6.

    PMID: 21285792BACKGROUND
  • Momeni A, Grauel E, Chang J. Complications after flexor tendon injuries. Hand Clin. 2010 May;26(2):179-89. doi: 10.1016/j.hcl.2009.11.004.

    PMID: 20494744BACKGROUND
  • Dowd MB, Figus A, Harris SB, Southgate CM, Foster AJ, Elliot D. The results of immediate re-repair of zone 1 and 2 primary flexor tendon repairs which rupture. J Hand Surg Br. 2006 Oct;31(5):507-13. doi: 10.1016/j.jhsb.2006.06.006. Epub 2006 Aug 22.

    PMID: 16930791BACKGROUND
  • Mustoe TA, Buck DW 2nd, Lalonde DH. The safe management of anesthesia, sedation, and pain in plastic surgery. Plast Reconstr Surg. 2010 Oct;126(4):165e-176e. doi: 10.1097/PRS.0b013e3181ebe5e9.

    PMID: 20885206BACKGROUND
  • Strickland JW. Results of flexor tendon surgery in zone II. Hand Clin. 1985 Feb;1(1):167-79.

    PMID: 4093459BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Interventions

Anesthesia, Conduction

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

AnesthesiaAnesthesia and Analgesia

Study Officials

  • Ruby Grewal, MD MSc FRCSC

    Western University, Canada

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Ruby Grewal, MD MSc FRCSC

CONTACT

Tym Frank, MD, FRCSC

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
The outcomes assessor will be blinded to the treatment received.
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Two groups. One interventional group and one control group with random allocation as described below.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 6, 2016

First Posted

May 1, 2017

Study Start

August 1, 2017

Primary Completion

November 1, 2018

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2033

Last Updated

July 17, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share