Integrating Animal-Assisted Therapy Into Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy for Maltreated Youth
TF-CBT+AAT
2 other identifiers
interventional
33
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine the incremental benefit of animal-assisted therapy (AAT) as an adjunct intervention when combined with Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy (TF-CBT) for the treatment of maltreated youth. In addition, the development of therapeutic rapport and the intensity of stress experienced during treatment sessions will be examined as mediational mechanisms of treatment outcome. This project will help determine whether a larger study to test the beneficial effects of AAT for maltreated youth is feasible and warranted.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
May 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 18, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 18, 2020
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 18, 2022
CompletedMay 18, 2022
May 1, 2022
2.3 years
April 20, 2017
February 3, 2022
May 16, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Scores on the UCLA Posttraumatic Stress Disorder Reaction Index
This is a caregiver version of the measure designed to assess child/youth posttraumatic stress disorder (PTSD) symptoms. This is a 27-item questionnaire were the frequency of each item is reported using a scale ranging from 0 (Never) to 4 (Most Days), yielding a potential full scale score ranging from 0 to 108. For inclusion in this study, a score of at least 32 on the pre-treatment administration was required as this score denotes the "borderline" range for the measure. Lower scores indicate fewer PTSD symptoms are present.
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Change in Scores on the Strengths and Difficulties Questionnaire Emotional Symptoms Subscale
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
Change in Scores on the Screen for Child Anxiety Related Disorders
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
Change in Scores on the Moods and Feelings Questionnaire
Data were obtained at pre-treatment and every four weeks thereafter until the protocol was completed, **up to 13 weeks**. The last assessment completed, excluding the pre-treatment assessment, was considered post-treatment.
Study Arms (2)
TF-CBT
ACTIVE COMPARATORYouth will receive standard Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy
TF-CBT+AAT
EXPERIMENTALYouth will received Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy with Animal-Assisted Therapy as an adjunct.
Interventions
TF-CBT is typically described as including 3 phases, each focusing on a common goal and encompassing a third of treatment (4 sessions). The first phase focuses on skills-building and includes psychoeducation, parenting skills training, relaxation skills training, affect modulation skills training, and cognitive coping skills training. The second phase involves focused gradual exposure activities, including construction of a narrative account of the child's maltreatment experiences and cognitive processing of maladaptive thoughts. The third phase emphasizes the child's mastery over environmental reminders of the maltreatment and includes sharing the trauma narrative with the caregiver, in vivo exposure to physical stimuli, and enhancing future development.
TF-CBT, as described in the other arm, with animal-assisted therapy as an adjunct intervention. During the administration of TF-CBT, a certified service dog will be in the room and the participant may elect to interact with the dog as various points throughout the sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- A caregiver willing to participate with the youth
- An allegation of child maltreatment investigated by child protective services (CPS) or the police
- A raw score of ≥ 39 (borderline or clinical elevation) on the caregiver- report version of the UCLA PTSD Reaction Index for the DSM-5.
You may not qualify if:
- Severe developmental delays and/or psychiatric problems that necessitate a higher level of care for the child. An allegation of child maltreatment investigated by child protective services (CPS) or the police
- Intellectual deficits for the child (IQ \< 80 on a cognitive screener)
- Caregiver inability to complete assessment measures due to psychiatric, cognitive, or other limitation
- The available caregiver is suspected or known to have perpetrated maltreatment
- A fear of dogs, a dog allergy, or any prior history of aggression toward animals for the child and/or caregiver
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Penn State Hershey Medical Center-TLC Research and Treatment Center
Harrisburg, Pennsylvania, 17110, United States
Related Publications (1)
Shenk CE, Allen B, Dreschel NA, Wang M, Felt JM, Brown MP, Bucher AM, Chen MJ, Olson AE. Respiratory Sinus Arrhythmia Change during Trauma-Focused Cognitive-Behavioral Therapy: Results from a Randomized Controlled Feasibility Trial. Res Child Adolesc Psychopathol. 2022 Nov;50(11):1487-1499. doi: 10.1007/s10802-022-00946-w. Epub 2022 Jun 11.
PMID: 35689729DERIVED
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Brian Allen
- Organization
- Penn State College of Medicine
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Brian Allen
Penn State College of Medicine
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- All individuals collecting and/or handling data will be masked.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate Professor, Pediatrics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 20, 2017
First Posted
May 1, 2017
Study Start
November 15, 2017
Primary Completion
March 18, 2020
Study Completion
March 18, 2020
Last Updated
May 18, 2022
Results First Posted
May 18, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
- Shared Documents
- STUDY PROTOCOL, SAP, ICF
- Time Frame
- Data will be available starting in July, 2020, and will remain available for 5 years.
- Access Criteria
- Access to data will require: 1. a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; 2. a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; 3. a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed; 4. A letter of approval from an applicable Institutional Review Board; and, 5. A signed data usage agreement.
The final dataset will be stripped of individual identifiers prior to release for sharing. Data subsets will only be made available to other users under data-sharing agreements that provide for: (1) a commitment to using the data only for research purposes and not to identify any individual participant; (2) a commitment to securing the data using appropriate computer technology; and (3) a commitment to destroying or returning the data after analyses are completed. Those wishing to access the data will need to directly contact the PI to complete the data-sharing agreement.