OLA to Lowest DP in Cardiac Surgery
Open-lung Ventilatory Approach With Positive End-expiratory Pressure Titrated to Lowest Driving Pressure in Cardiac Surgery Patients
1 other identifier
interventional
60
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study aims to compared the effects in driving pressure of an open-lung strategy with a positive end-expiratory pressure (PEEP) titrated to best driving pressure (DP) after a RM versus the recommended protective PEEP of 5 cmH2O without a recruitment manuever in non-obese patients undergoing cardiac surgery.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jul 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 25, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2019
CompletedOctober 2, 2018
October 1, 2018
1.4 years
April 25, 2017
October 1, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
driving pressure
The driving pressure is a physiological ventilatory parameter measured as platteau pressure minus PEEP. This parameter may be associated with postoperative pulmonary complications
intraoperative
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Postoperative pulmonary complications
72 first postoperative hours
Study Arms (2)
DP-PEEP
EXPERIMENTALrecruitment maneuver + individualized PEEP
RM-5
ACTIVE COMPARATORrecruitment maneuver + fixed standard PEEP
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Non-obese patients scheduled for cardiac surgery (CABG and valve replacement)
You may not qualify if:
- i) age \<18yr or \>80yr, ii) pregnancy or breast-feeding status, and iii) patients with previous known respiratory disease, iv) Body mass index \>35 kg/m2, v) emergency surgery and vi) hemodynamic instability at entry (need of vasopressors or ionotropes at entry or a ventricular assist device.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Carlos Ferrando
Valencia, 46010, Spain
Related Publications (5)
Costa Leme A, Hajjar LA, Volpe MS, Fukushima JT, De Santis Santiago RR, Osawa EA, Pinheiro de Almeida J, Gerent AM, Franco RA, Zanetti Feltrim MI, Nozawa E, de Moraes Coimbra VR, de Moraes Ianotti R, Hashizume CS, Kalil Filho R, Auler JO Jr, Jatene FB, Gomes Galas FR, Amato MB. Effect of Intensive vs Moderate Alveolar Recruitment Strategies Added to Lung-Protective Ventilation on Postoperative Pulmonary Complications: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2017 Apr 11;317(14):1422-1432. doi: 10.1001/jama.2017.2297.
PMID: 28322416BACKGROUNDSerpa Neto A, Hemmes SN, Barbas CS, Beiderlinden M, Biehl M, Binnekade JM, Canet J, Fernandez-Bustamante A, Futier E, Gajic O, Hedenstierna G, Hollmann MW, Jaber S, Kozian A, Licker M, Lin WQ, Maslow AD, Memtsoudis SG, Reis Miranda D, Moine P, Ng T, Paparella D, Putensen C, Ranieri M, Scavonetto F, Schilling T, Schmid W, Selmo G, Severgnini P, Sprung J, Sundar S, Talmor D, Treschan T, Unzueta C, Weingarten TN, Wolthuis EK, Wrigge H, Gama de Abreu M, Pelosi P, Schultz MJ; PROVE Network Investigators. Protective versus Conventional Ventilation for Surgery: A Systematic Review and Individual Patient Data Meta-analysis. Anesthesiology. 2015 Jul;123(1):66-78. doi: 10.1097/ALN.0000000000000706.
PMID: 25978326BACKGROUNDFerrando C, Soro M, Canet J, Unzueta MC, Suarez F, Librero J, Peiro S, Llombart A, Delgado C, Leon I, Rovira L, Ramasco F, Granell M, Aldecoa C, Diaz O, Balust J, Garutti I, de la Matta M, Pensado A, Gonzalez R, Duran ME, Gallego L, Del Valle SG, Redondo FJ, Diaz P, Pestana D, Rodriguez A, Aguirre J, Garcia JM, Garcia J, Espinosa E, Charco P, Navarro J, Rodriguez C, Tusman G, Belda FJ; iPROVE investigators (Appendices 1 and 2). Rationale and study design for an individualized perioperative open lung ventilatory strategy (iPROVE): study protocol for a randomized controlled trial. Trials. 2015 Apr 27;16:193. doi: 10.1186/s13063-015-0694-1.
PMID: 25927183BACKGROUNDBorges DL, Nina VJ, Costa Mde A, Baldez TE, Santos NP, Lima IM, Figueredo ED, Lula JL. Effects of different PEEP levels on respiratory mechanics and oxygenation after coronary artery bypass grafting. Rev Bras Cir Cardiovasc. 2013 Jul-Sep;28(3):380-5. doi: 10.5935/1678-9741.20130058.
PMID: 24343688BACKGROUNDReis Miranda D, Gommers D, Struijs A, Dekker R, Mekel J, Feelders R, Lachmann B, Bogers AJ. Ventilation according to the open lung concept attenuates pulmonary inflammatory response in cardiac surgery. Eur J Cardiothorac Surg. 2005 Dec;28(6):889-95. doi: 10.1016/j.ejcts.2005.10.007. Epub 2005 Nov 3.
PMID: 16271479BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal investigador
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 25, 2017
First Posted
April 28, 2017
Study Start
July 10, 2017
Primary Completion
December 1, 2018
Study Completion
February 1, 2019
Last Updated
October 2, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-10
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share