Effectiveness of High Flow Oxygen Therapy in Patients With Hematologic Malignancy Acute Hypoxemic Respiratory Failure
HFOT
1 other identifier
interventional
102
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Effectiveness of high flow oxygen therapy in patients with hematologic malignancy acute hypoxemic respiratory failure
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 28, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 14, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 14, 2018
CompletedJune 12, 2020
June 1, 2020
1.9 years
April 13, 2017
June 10, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Intubation rate
Intubation rate for each group
First seven days
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Mortality
First 28 days
patients comforts
First 24 hours
Study Arms (2)
Standard oxygen group
NO INTERVENTIONThis patient groups will receive only routine oxygen therapy. Routine oxygen therapy involves administering low-to-medium oxygen flows through a nasal cannula or mask to achieve SpO2≥95%.
High flow oxygen therapy group
EXPERIMENTALThis patients group will receive high flow oxygen therapy. High flow nasal oxygen therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, it allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) values of nearly 100%.
Interventions
High-flow nasal oxygen \[HFNO\] therapy is a focus of growing attention as an alternative to standard oxygen therapy. By providing warmed and humidified gas, HFNO allows the delivery of higher flow rates \[of up to 60 L/min\] via nasal cannula devices, with fraction of inspired oxygen(FiO2) values of nearly 100%.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Known immunosuppression defined as haematological malignancy.
- Need for oxygen therapy defined as with oxygen free arterial blood gas examination one or more of the following: (a) PaO2/FiO2\<300 mmHg (b) PaCO2≤45 mmHg (c) SaO2\<92%
- Respiratory distress with a respiratory rate \>22/min
You may not qualify if:
- Refusal of study participation
- Pregnancy or breastfeeding
- Hypercapnia with a formal indication for non-invasive mechanical ventilation (NIMV) (PaCO2 ≥ 45 mmHg)
- Patients whose clinicians have decided on NIMV (Non-Invasive Mechanical Ventilation) and IMV (Invasive Mechanical Ventilation)
- Haemodynamic instability (mean arterial pressure \<65 mmHg)
- Vasopressor needs
- Awareness confusion and disorientation
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Kursat Gundoganlead
Study Sites (1)
Erciyes University Medical School
Kayseri, 38039, Turkey (Türkiye)
Related Publications (4)
Turkoglu M, Erdem GU, Suyani E, Sancar ME, Yalcin MM, Aygencel G, Aki Z, Sucak G. Acute respiratory distress syndrome in patients with hematological malignancies. Hematology. 2013 May;18(3):123-30. doi: 10.1179/1607845412Y.0000000038. Epub 2012 Nov 15.
PMID: 23321772BACKGROUNDLemiale V, Mokart D, Mayaux J, Lambert J, Rabbat A, Demoule A, Azoulay E. The effects of a 2-h trial of high-flow oxygen by nasal cannula versus Venturi mask in immunocompromised patients with hypoxemic acute respiratory failure: a multicenter randomized trial. Crit Care. 2015 Nov 2;19:380. doi: 10.1186/s13054-015-1097-0.
PMID: 26521922BACKGROUNDMaggiore SM, Idone FA, Vaschetto R, Festa R, Cataldo A, Antonicelli F, Montini L, De Gaetano A, Navalesi P, Antonelli M. Nasal high-flow versus Venturi mask oxygen therapy after extubation. Effects on oxygenation, comfort, and clinical outcome. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2014 Aug 1;190(3):282-8. doi: 10.1164/rccm.201402-0364OC.
PMID: 25003980BACKGROUNDHernandez G, Vaquero C, Gonzalez P, Subira C, Frutos-Vivar F, Rialp G, Laborda C, Colinas L, Cuena R, Fernandez R. Effect of Postextubation High-Flow Nasal Cannula vs Conventional Oxygen Therapy on Reintubation in Low-Risk Patients: A Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2016 Apr 5;315(13):1354-61. doi: 10.1001/jama.2016.2711.
PMID: 26975498BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Associate professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 13, 2017
First Posted
April 28, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
September 14, 2018
Study Completion
September 14, 2018
Last Updated
June 12, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share