NCT03132805

Brief Summary

In this study, the investigators propose to examine whether the combination of a universal, elementary school-based preventive intervention with an indicated preventive and treatment intervention would yield greater impact on aggression than the universal preventive intervention alone.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
5,233

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2016

Completed
10 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 4, 2017

Completed
24 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 28, 2017

Completed
4 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

April 30, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

April 30, 2021

Completed
1.2 years until next milestone

Results Posted

Study results publicly available

July 29, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

August 2, 2022

Status Verified

July 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.9 years

First QC Date

April 4, 2017

Results QC Date

April 26, 2022

Last Update Submit

July 29, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Change in Direct Classroom Observations of Student Behavior Between Pre-test and Post-test, 6 Months After the Pre-test.

    Classroom observations of student behavior were carried out by independent observers on two occasions, one week apart, at pre- and post-test respectively. The behaviors observed were on-task and physical aggression. Behaviors were observed in 10 second intervals and were recorded as present if they occurred at least once during a 10 second interval. The per interval on-task and physical aggression scores could range from 0-1, with 0 signifying the behavior was not observed and 1 signifying the behavior was observed. The on-task and physical aggression scores used in the analyses were the average score across all of the 10-second intervals the student was observed. (Adapted from Tapp, Wehby \& Ellis, 1995).

    The observations are carried out at pre-test and at post-test, 6 months after the pre-test.

  • Teacher Ratings of Student On-task and Aggressive-disruptive Behavior in the Classroom.

    Change in Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation between pre-test and post-test, 6 months after the pre-test. Student adaptation to classroom task demands are rated by teachers over the last 3 weeks on a 6-point frequency scale (1 = almost never to 6 = almost always). The domains include authority acceptance and readiness to learn. Authority acceptance items include compliance with classroom rules, and readiness to learn items reflect attentive classroom behaviors (e.g. stays on task). The mean of the teacher ratings across the items making up each of these subscales was used in the outcome analyses. The minimum score for both the authority acceptance and readiness to learn subscales was 1 and maximum score was 6. Higher scores on both subscales reflect greater adaptation.

    The ratings are carried out at pre-test, post-test, 6 months after the pre-test.

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in Peer Assessment Inventory Between Pre-test and Post-test, 6 Months After the Pre-test.

    The peer nomination instrument is administered at pre-test and at post-test, 6 months after the pre-test.

  • Change in Pictorial Scale of Perceived Competence and Social Acceptance for Young Children Between Pre-test and Post-test, 6 Months After the Pre-test.

    This scale will be administered at pre-test and post-test, 6-months after the pre-test.

  • Change in Teacher Sense of Self Efficacy Scale Between Pre-test and Post-test, 6-months After the Pre-test.

    This scale will be administered at pre-test and post-test, 6 months after the pre-test.

  • Change in the Maslach Burnout Inventory Between Pre-test and Post-test, 6 Months After the Pre-test.

    This scale will be administered at pre-test and post-test, 6 months after the pre-test.

Study Arms (3)

Control

NO INTERVENTION

Schools which receive no intervention

PATHS to PAX

EXPERIMENTAL

Universal classroom-based preventive intervention designed to reduce aggression.

Behavioral: PATHS to PAX

PATHS to PAX and the IncredibleYears

EXPERIMENTAL

The combination of PATHS to PAX with the Incredible Years child and parent groups.

Behavioral: PATHS to PAX and the Incredible Years

Interventions

PATHS to PAXBEHAVIORAL

A universal classroom-based preventive intervention designed to prevent aggression.

PATHS to PAX

A universal classroom-based preventive intervention in combination with an indicated preventive intervention, both of which are designed to prevent aggression.

PATHS to PAX and the IncredibleYears

Eligibility Criteria

Age5 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersYes
Age GroupsChild (0-17), Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Students enrolled in kindergarten through second grade classrooms and their teachers.

You may not qualify if:

  • Students must be enrolled in regular education classrooms.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

Baltimore, Maryland, 21205, United States

Location

Related Publications (6)

  • Maslach, C., Jackson, S. E., & Leiter, M. P. (1997). Maslach Burnout Inventory: Third edition. In C. P. Zalaquett & R. J. Wood (Eds.), Evaluating stress: A book of resources (pp. 191-218). Scarecrow Education.

    BACKGROUND
  • Tapp, J., Wehby, J., & Ellis, D. (1995). A multiple option observation system for experimental studies: MOOSES. Behavior Research Methods, Instruments & Computers, 27(1), 25-31.

    BACKGROUND
  • Harter S, Pike R. The pictorial scale of perceived competence and social acceptance for young children. Child Dev. 1984 Dec;55(6):1969-82.

    PMID: 6525886BACKGROUND
  • Main, S., & Hammond, L. (2008). Best Practice or Most Practiced? Pre-Service Teachers' Beliefs about Effective Behaviour Management Strategies and Reported Self-Efficacy. Australian Journal of Teacher Education, 33, 28-39.

    BACKGROUND
  • Werthamer-Larsson L, Kellam S, Wheeler L. Effect of first-grade classroom environment on shy behavior, aggressive behavior, and concentration problems. Am J Community Psychol. 1991 Aug;19(4):585-602. doi: 10.1007/BF00937993.

    PMID: 1755437BACKGROUND
  • Domitrovich CE, Bradshaw CP, Berg JK, Pas ET, Becker KD, Musci R, Embry DD, Ialongo N. How Do School-Based Prevention Programs Impact Teachers? Findings from a Randomized Trial of an Integrated Classroom Management and Social-Emotional Program. Prev Sci. 2016 Apr;17(3):325-37. doi: 10.1007/s11121-015-0618-z.

    PMID: 26749578BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Aggression

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Aberrant Motor Behavior in DementiaBehavioral SymptomsBehaviorSocial Behavior

Limitations and Caveats

Due to the COVID-19 school related disruptions, we were unable to fully complete the implementation of the interventions for the 4th cohort. We were unable to complete the Classroom Observations of Student Behavior, Peer Assessments, and Perceived Competence of Social Acceptance at post-test in the 4th cohort. The Teacher Observation of Classroom Adaptation scales were completed based on the virtual-learning environment for the one-year follow-up of the 4th cohort of students.

Results Point of Contact

Title
Nicholas S. Ialongo, Principal Investigator
Organization
Johns Hopkins University

Study Officials

  • Nicholas Ialongo, PhD

    Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Publication Agreements

PI is Sponsor Employee
No
Restrictive Agreement
No

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
SINGLE
Who Masked
OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Masking Details
Outcome assessors are blind to intervention status.
Purpose
PREVENTION
Intervention Model
FACTORIAL
Model Details: Schools are randomly assigned to 1 of 3 conditions, control, universal classroom-based preventive intervention, and universal classroom-based intervention plus an indicated preventive intervention. Data on student outcomes to be collected at pre- post- and 6 month follow-up. \*Enrollment numbers reflect both students and teachers who agreed to participate in the study.
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 4, 2017

First Posted

April 28, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2016

Primary Completion

April 30, 2021

Study Completion

April 30, 2021

Last Updated

August 2, 2022

Results First Posted

July 29, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations