Postoperative Intermittent Intrauterine Balloon Dilatation Therapy.
Prevention of Postoperative Adhesion Reformation by Intrauterine Balloon Therapy: a Randomized Controlled Trial
1 other identifier
interventional
200
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this prospective, randomized, controlled study, the investigators wish to determine the efficacy of intrauterine balloon (IUB) dilatation in the prevention of adhesion reformation when compared with the conventional management.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
November 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 15, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
September 13, 2019
CompletedSeptember 13, 2019
August 1, 2019
6 months
April 24, 2017
November 22, 2018
August 8, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Number of Participants With Adhesion Reformation (American Fertility Society Score of Greater Than 0) 8 Weeks Later After the Index Surgery
The American Fertility Society (AFS) score ranges from 0-12, while represented the severity of the adhesions. Mild 1-4, Moderate 5-8, Severe 9-12. The lower the AFS score is, the better the prognosis the patient is. When the surgery was finished the AFS score should be 0. The reformation of intrauterine adhesions was evaluated by third-look hysteroscopy, if the score was greater than 0, a adhesion reformation was considered.
at 8 weeks post-operation
The American Fertility Society Score 8 Weeks After Operation
The American Fertility Society(AFS) score of each group was evaluated again at third-look hysteroscopy in order to reflect the efficacy of the treatment. The original AFS score was recorded in baseline characteristics part. The AFS score ranges from 0-12, while represented the severity of the adhesions. Mild 1-4, Moderate 5-8, Severe 9-12. The lower the AFS score is, the better the prognosis the patient is. When the surgery was finished the AFS score score should be 0.
at 8 weeks post-operation
Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart Score 8 Weeks After Operation
The Pictorial Blood Loss Assessment Chart (PBAC) score was used to represent the menstrual flow volume of the patient. The PBAC score was evaluated again at 8 weeks after surgery. A higher PBAC score after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis means a better outcome.The PBAC score of a normal women usually range from 30-100 points. The minium value of PBAC score is 0, which means the patient is amenorrhea. The maximum value of PBAC score is 1000. We measured the score before and 8 weeks after the operation in order to assess if there was any improvement (higher than before) in menstrual flow.
at 8 weeks post-operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pregnancy Outcome Within 12 Months Follow-up After Third Look Hysteroscopy
within 12 months after third look hysteroscopy(8 weeks post-operation)
Study Arms (2)
IUB dilatation therapy
EXPERIMENTALThe patient will have Foley-catheter intrauterine balloon dilatation 2 weeks and 6 weeks after hysteroscopic adhesiolysis. A second-look hysteroscopy will be carried out in the early proliferative phase 4 weeks after the surgery and third-look hysteroscopy will be carried out 8 weeks after the surgery.
control group
NO INTERVENTIONPatient will not undergo any balloon therapy. A second-look hysteroscopy will be carried out in the early proliferative phase 4 weeks after the surgery and third-look hysteroscopy will be carried out 8 weeks after the surgery.
Interventions
A Foley catheter (size 14fr) will be prepared by cutting the excess catheter tip protruding beyond the balloon prior to insertion into the uterine cavity. Once the catheter has reached the fundus, 3-4.5mls of saline will be slowly introduced into the balloon under ultrasound guidance, in order to directly visualize the distention of the cavity and division of any intrauterine adhesions, if present.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- women aged 18-40 years;
- moderate to severe intrauterine adhesion (AFS score≥5);
- no previous history of hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in our hospital;
- written consent obtained
- agreement to have second-look and third-look hysteroscopy.
You may not qualify if:
- minimal adhesion (AFS score \<5);
- previous hysteroscopic adhesiolysis in our hospital.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Fu Xing Hospital
Beijing, Beijing Municipality, 100038, China
Related Publications (10)
Saravelos SH, Li TC. Ultrasound-guided treatment of intrauterine adhesions in the outpatient setting. Ultrasound Obstet Gynecol. 2017 Aug;50(2):278-280. doi: 10.1002/uog.16218. No abstract available.
PMID: 27420903BACKGROUNDMarch CM. Intrauterine adhesions. Obstet Gynecol Clin North Am. 1995 Sep;22(3):491-505.
PMID: 8524533BACKGROUNDASHERMAN JG. Traumatic intra-uterine adhesions. J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1950 Dec;57(6):892-6. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1950.tb06053.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 14804168BACKGROUNDASHERMAN JG. Amenorrhoea traumatica (atretica). J Obstet Gynaecol Br Emp. 1948 Feb;55(1):23-30. doi: 10.1111/j.1471-0528.1948.tb07045.x. No abstract available.
PMID: 18902559BACKGROUNDValle RF, Sciarra JJ. Intrauterine adhesions: hysteroscopic diagnosis, classification, treatment, and reproductive outcome. Am J Obstet Gynecol. 1988 Jun;158(6 Pt 1):1459-70. doi: 10.1016/0002-9378(88)90382-1.
PMID: 3381869BACKGROUNDOrhue AA, Aziken ME, Igbefoh JO. A comparison of two adjunctive treatments for intrauterine adhesions following lysis. Int J Gynaecol Obstet. 2003 Jul;82(1):49-56. doi: 10.1016/s0020-7292(03)00030-4.
PMID: 12834941BACKGROUNDYu D, Wong YM, Cheong Y, Xia E, Li TC. Asherman syndrome--one century later. Fertil Steril. 2008 Apr;89(4):759-79. doi: 10.1016/j.fertnstert.2008.02.096.
PMID: 18406834BACKGROUNDSaravelos SH, Jayaprakasan K, Ojha K, Li TC. Assessment of the uterus with three-dimensional ultrasound in women undergoing ART. Hum Reprod Update. 2017 Mar 1;23(2):188-210. doi: 10.1093/humupd/dmw040.
PMID: 28007752BACKGROUNDGrimbizis GF, Di Spiezio Sardo A, Saravelos SH, Gordts S, Exacoustos C, Van Schoubroeck D, Bermejo C, Amso NN, Nargund G, Timmermann D, Athanasiadis A, Brucker S, De Angelis C, Gergolet M, Li TC, Tanos V, Tarlatzis B, Farquharson R, Gianaroli L, Campo R. The Thessaloniki ESHRE/ESGE consensus on diagnosis of female genital anomalies. Gynecol Surg. 2016;13:1-16. doi: 10.1007/s10397-015-0909-1. Epub 2015 Nov 4.
PMID: 26918000BACKGROUNDShi X, Saravelos SH, Zhou Q, Huang X, Xia E, Li TC. Prevention of postoperative adhesion reformation by intermittent intrauterine balloon therapy: a randomised controlled trial. BJOG. 2019 Sep;126(10):1259-1266. doi: 10.1111/1471-0528.15843. Epub 2019 Jul 18.
PMID: 31207009DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Dr. Shi Xiaoyu
- Organization
- Fuxing Hospital, Capital Medical University, Beijing, China
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Tinchiu Li
Fuxing Hospital,Capital Medical University,China
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR
- Masking Details
- Both surgeons conducting the hysteroscopic surgery and follow-up hysteroscopy were blinded to the patient group allocation.
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2017
First Posted
April 27, 2017
Study Start
May 15, 2017
Primary Completion
November 15, 2017
Study Completion
November 15, 2018
Last Updated
September 13, 2019
Results First Posted
September 13, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share