Popliteal Plexus Block for Postoperative Pain After ACL Reconstruction
The Effect of the Popliteal Plexus Block on Postoperative Pain After Reconstruction of the Anterior Cruciate Ligament
1 other identifier
interventional
15
1 country
2
Brief Summary
The study aims to investigate the effect of the popliteal plexus block (PPB) on postoperative pain in patients undergoing anterior cruciate ligament (ACL) reconstruction.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 23, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
September 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 4, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 4, 2017
CompletedJanuary 23, 2018
April 1, 2017
2 months
April 23, 2017
January 18, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
The effect of the popliteal plexus block (PPB)
Evaluated as the percentage of patients with postoperative pain NRS \>3, dropping in pain score to NRS ≤ 3 after the PPB
Pain scores (NRS): 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after PPB
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Percentage of patients with central knee pain
Pain scores: 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after arrival at the post anesthesia care unit (PACU)
Onset time for PPB
Pain scores (NRS): 15, 30, 45 and 60 minutes after PPB
The effect of the PPB on cutaneous sensation
Baseline, 30 and 60 minutes after PPB
The effect of the PPB on muscle strength
Baseline, 60 minutes after PPB
Study Arms (2)
Patients with postoperative pain, NRS >3
EXPERIMENTALPatients reporting postoperative pain (NRS \>3) localized to the center of the knee (10 patients) will receive a popliteal plexus block
Patients with postoperative pain, NRS ≤ 3
NO INTERVENTION(approx. 90 patients)
Interventions
10 mL Marcain-adrenalin 5 mg/mL + 5 microgram/mL. Ultrasound-guided injection into the distal part of the adductor canal
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients undergoing ACL reconstruction on one of the two trial sites
- Age ≥ 18
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) status I-III
- Informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Patients unable to cooperate
- Patients not able to speak Danish or with other communication problems
- Pregnancy
- Contraindication towards any medical product used in the study
- Preoperatively reduced sensation on the medial and lateral part of the lower leg
- Patients with diabetes requiring medical treatment
- Preoperative intake of opioids (dosed \> once daily)
- ACL revision
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (2)
Aarhus University Hospital
Aarhus C, 8000, Denmark
The Regional Hospital in Horsens
Horsens, 8700, Denmark
Related Publications (4)
Wong WY, Bjorn S, Strid JM, Borglum J, Bendtsen TF. Defining the Location of the Adductor Canal Using Ultrasound. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2017 Mar/Apr;42(2):241-245. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000539.
PMID: 28002228BACKGROUNDBendtsen TF, Moriggl B, Chan V, Borglum J. The Optimal Analgesic Block for Total Knee Arthroplasty. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2016 Nov/Dec;41(6):711-719. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000485.
PMID: 27685346BACKGROUNDGrevstad U, Mathiesen O, Valentiner LS, Jaeger P, Hilsted KL, Dahl JB. Effect of adductor canal block versus femoral nerve block on quadriceps strength, mobilization, and pain after total knee arthroplasty: a randomized, blinded study. Reg Anesth Pain Med. 2015 Jan-Feb;40(1):3-10. doi: 10.1097/AAP.0000000000000169.
PMID: 25376972BACKGROUNDGoffin P, Lecoq JP, Ninane V, Brichant JF, Sala-Blanch X, Gautier PE, Bonnet P, Carlier A, Hadzic A. Interfascial Spread of Injectate After Adductor Canal Injection in Fresh Human Cadavers. Anesth Analg. 2016 Aug;123(2):501-3. doi: 10.1213/ANE.0000000000001441.
PMID: 27442773BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan M Jensen, MD
Aarhus University Hospital
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christian Jessen, MD
The Regional Hospital in Horsens
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 23, 2017
First Posted
April 26, 2017
Study Start
September 27, 2017
Primary Completion
December 4, 2017
Study Completion
December 4, 2017
Last Updated
January 23, 2018
Record last verified: 2017-04