Patient Satisfaction of Glazed IPS Empress CAD Versus Glazed Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers
Patient Satisfaction and One Year Clinical Evaluation of Glazed IPS Empress CAD Versus Glazed Celtra Duo Ceramic Laminate Veneers
1 other identifier
interventional
36
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The most frequent reason for failure of laminate veneers made of glass ceramics (feldspathic, leucite based and lithium silicate based ceramics) was fracture of the ceramic, Therefore, ceramic materials that have higher fracture resistance, especially for patients suffering from abnormal occlusion, are needed.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Aug 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 24, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 26, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
August 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 1, 2018
CompletedMay 2, 2017
April 1, 2017
1 year
April 24, 2017
April 29, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
fracture resistance
scores
1 year
Study Arms (2)
glazed Celtra Duo
EXPERIMENTALzirconia reinforced lithium silicate glass ceramic is infiltrated with 10% zirconia by weight, producing zirconia reinforced lithium silicate ceramic
Glazed IPS Empress CAD
ACTIVE COMPARATORglazed Leucite based glass ceramics ,Its a glass ceramic which is etchable and proved to have good esthetics if used for laminate veneers
Interventions
Standard etchable glass ceramic for laminate veneers
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All subjects are required to be
- From 18-50 years old, be able to read and sign the informed consent document.
- Physically and psychologically able to tolerate conventional restorative procedures
- have no active periodontal or pulpal diseases, have teeth with good restorations
- Patients with teeth problems indicated for laminate veneer:
- Discoloration
- Fracture not involving more than 50% enamel loss
- Mild malposition
- Diastema
- Enamel fluorosis
- Stained or defective restorations
- Willing to return for follow-up examinations and evaluation
You may not qualify if:
- \. Patients in the growth stage with partially erupted teeth 2. Patient with fractured teeth of more than 50% enamel loss 3. Patients with poor oral hygiene and motivation 4. Pregnant women's 5. Patient with post and core endodontically treated teeth 6. Psychiatric problems or unrealistic expectations 7. Lack of opposite occluding dentition in the area intended for restoration 8. Patients involved in contact sports 9. Teeth with deep discoloration
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Cairo Universitylead
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Jylan El Guindy
CONTACT
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Assistant lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 24, 2017
First Posted
April 26, 2017
Study Start
August 1, 2017
Primary Completion
August 1, 2018
Study Completion
September 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 2, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04