Study to Assess Outcomes in Women Undergoing Either Hysteroscopic Sterilization (Essure®) or Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization
An Open-label, Non-randomized, Prospective Observational Cohort Study to Assess Post-procedural Outcomes in Two Cohorts of Women Who Chose to Undergo Either Hysteroscopic Sterilization (Essure®) or Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization
1 other identifier
interventional
990
1 country
57
Brief Summary
This study is designed to assess post-procedural outcomes for women who chose to undergo either hysteroscopic sterilization (Essure®) or laparoscopic tubal sterilization, including:
- Pelvic and/or lower abdominal pain
- Abnormal uterine bleeding
- Surgical intervention (including "insert removal" and hysterectomy)
- Allergic, hypersensitivity, or autoimmune-like reactions
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
57 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 25, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 3, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2024
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2024
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
May 22, 2026
CompletedMay 22, 2026
April 1, 2026
7.7 years
March 5, 2017
December 22, 2025
April 30, 2026
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (5)
Proportion of Subjects Reporting AEs of Chronic Lower Abdominal and/or Pelvic Pain After Insertion of Essure System or After Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization
The proportion of subjects reporting AEs of chronic lower abdominal and / or pelvic pain after insertion of Essure System compared to the proportion of subjects reporting AEs of chronic lower abdominal and / or pelvic pain after laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Statistical analyses were exploratory and descriptive in nature and no confirmatory hypothesis testing was intended to be performed; p-values were to be interpreted as a metric for uncertainty (note: no analysis included in this final analysis provides p-values). Therefore, no adjustment for multiplicity was necessary. All endpoints and variables were analyzed by descriptive statistical methods.
Up to 60 months
Bleeding: The Proportion of Subjects Reporting AEs of Abnormal Uterine Bleeding (AUB) After Insertion of Essure System Compared to the Proportion of Subjects Reporting AEs of AUB After Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization
Incidence of new onset or worsening abnormal bleeding events was based on AE reporting. If a potential bleeding AE was reported at a scheduled visit or if the subject spontaneously reports such an event to the site at some other time, the event was to be evaluated per standard AE assessment. If during the course of a scheduled PRO administration the subject indicated that she experienced abnormal bleeding that reached a preset threshold on the questionnaire, the investigator was alerted and instructed to investigate this finding in order to determine whether or not an AE occurred.
Up to 60 months
Proportion of Subjects With Reported Allergic/Hypersensitivity Reactions
For potential allergic/hypersensitivity reactions, investigators were instructed that an evaluation was to be performed in subjects who presented with symptoms that could have possibly been related to an inflammatory reaction. After the evaluation of the subject was complete, regardless of the investigator's assessment as to whether or not a hypersensitivity/allergic reaction had occurred, all information was to be forwarded to the Adjudication Committee in a blinded fashion. Final determination of whether or not a hypersensitivity/allergic event had occurred was based on the determination of this committee.
Up to 60 months
Proportion of Subjects With Newly Diagnosed or Worsening Autoimmune Disorders
Any subject presenting with symptoms indicating a potential autoimmune disorder was to be evaluated per standard medical practice. All effort was to be made to obtain records of any diagnostic workup conducted by outside physicians. NiLPT, chromium LPT, serum or plasma nickel level, and serum or plasma titanium level and serum inflammatory cytokines samples were also to be drawn by the study site. An appropriate human leukocyte antigen (HLA) panel was to be run on previously obtained baseline samples if sufficient sample existed. After the evaluation of the subject was complete, all information was to be forwarded to the adjudication committee in a blinded fashion, regardless of investigator's assessment as to whether or not an autoimmune disorder existed. Final determination of whether or not an autoimmune disorder had occurred was based on the determination of this committee.
Up to 60 months
Proportion of Subjects Undergoing Invasive Gynecologic Surgery After Essure Placement (Excluding Second Placement Attempts), Including Essure Removal Compared to Subjects Undergoing Invasive Gynecologic Surgery After Laparoscopic Tubal Sterilization
Up to 60 months
Study Arms (2)
ESSURE (BAY1454032)
EXPERIMENTALSubjects selecting hysteroscopic sterilization who are not contraindicated for the Essure procedure according to the most current approved version of the Essure IFU. Subject willing to use alternative contraception for at least 3 months post-Essure placement procedure, until a satisfactory Essure Confirmation Test is documented.
Laparoscopic tubal sterilization
ACTIVE COMPARATORSubjects selecting laparoscopic sterilization who are not contraindicated for laparoscopic tubal sterilization according to common clinical practice standard of care
Interventions
Decision for either treatment will be based upon clinical practice and physician/patient counseling, and will not be specified in the study protocol.
Decision for either treatment will be based upon clinical practice and physician/patient counseling. In addition of routine care practice, blood draws will be performed at baseline, 12 months and 60 months on subjects undergoing either an ESSURE procedure or a laparoscopic tubal sterilization.
Decision for either treatment will be based upon clinical practice and physician/patient counseling, and will not be specified in the study protocol.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subjects who are at least 21 years of age;
- Subjects of all weights will be included;
- Subjects who are scheduled to undergo an Essure insert placement procedure for permanent birth control or laparoscopic tubal sterilization. Decision for either treatment based upon clinical practice and physician/patient counseling.
- For the Essure group only:
- Subjects selecting hysteroscopic sterilization who are not contraindicated for the Essure procedure according to the most current approved version of the Essure IFU;
- For the laparoscopic tubal sterilization group only:
- Subjects selecting laparoscopic sterilization who are not contraindicated for laparoscopic tubal sterilization according to common clinical practice standard of care.
You may not qualify if:
- Subjects who are post-menopausal;
- Subjects suspected of being or confirmed pregnant;
- Subjects post-partum or undergone pregnancy termination ≤6 weeks prior to scheduled procedure;
- Subjects uncertain about ending fertility;
- Subjects with an active upper or lower genital tract infection;
- Subjects with gynecologic malignancy (suspected or known);
- Subjects who have had an attempted prior sterilization procedure (either laparoscopic or hysteroscopic);
- Subjects scheduled to undergo concomitant intrauterine or laparoscopic procedures at the time of insert placement (intrauterine device removal is not considered a concomitant procedure) or laparoscopic sterilization;
- Subjects with unexplained vaginal bleeding.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Bayerlead
Study Sites (57)
New Horizons Women's Care
Chandler, Arizona, 85224, United States
Precision Trials, AZ, LLC
Phoenix, Arizona, 85032, United States
Visions Clinical Research - Tucson
Tucson, Arizona, 85712, United States
Eclipse Clinical Research
Tucson, Arizona, 85745-2696, United States
Baptist Health Center for Clinical Research
Little Rock, Arkansas, 72205-6325, United States
United Clinical Research
Huntington Beach, California, 90255, United States
Orange Coast Women's Medical Group - Laguna Hills Office
Laguna Hills, California, 92653, United States
Physicians Research Options, LLC
Lakewood, Colorado, 80228, United States
The Women's Health Group, P.C.
Thornton, Colorado, 80229-4388, United States
M & O Clinical Research, LLC
Fort Lauderdale, Florida, 33316, United States
Altus Research
Lake Worth, Florida, 33461, United States
Universal Axon Clinical Research
Miami, Florida, 33166, United States
Physician Care Clinical Research
Sarasota, Florida, 34239, United States
Clinical Research Prime, LLLP
Idaho Falls, Idaho, 83402-3344, United States
John H Stroger Jr. Hospital of Cook County
Chicago, Illinois, 60612, United States
Women's Health Advantage
Fort Wayne, Indiana, 46825, United States
IU Health University Hospital
Indianapolis, Indiana, 46202, United States
Office of Dr. Cindy Basinski, LLC
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630, United States
Women's Health Care, PC
Newburgh, Indiana, 47630, United States
The Iowa Clinic, PC
West Des Moines, Iowa, 50266-8289, United States
University of Kentucky Albert B. Chandler Hospital
Lexington, Kentucky, 40536-0001, United States
Horizon Research Group of Opelousas, LLC
Eunice, Louisiana, 70535, United States
Mid-Atlantic Permanente Research Institute
Rockville, Maryland, 20852, United States
Tufts Medical Center
Boston, Massachusetts, 02111, United States
Women's Integrated Health Care, PC
Grand Blanc, Michigan, 48439, United States
Jersey Shore University Medical Center
Neptune City, New Jersey, 07753, United States
Columbia University Medical Center
New York, New York, 10032, United States
Unified Women's Clinical Research, LLC
Greensboro, North Carolina, 27401-1207, United States
Women's Health Alliance
Raleigh, North Carolina, 27607, United States
Unified Women's Clinical Research
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27103-1749, United States
Wake Forest Baptist Health
Winston-Salem, North Carolina, 27157-1009, United States
Seven Hills Women's Health Centers
Cincinnati, Ohio, 45242, United States
MetroHealth Medical Center
Cleveland, Ohio, 44109-1998, United States
Ohio State University
Columbus, Ohio, 43210, United States
Columbus OB-GYN/Radiant Research
Columbus, Ohio, 43213, United States
Complete Healthcare for Women, Inc.
Columbus, Ohio, 43231, United States
Wright State Physicians Health Center
Dayton, Ohio, 45405-4534, United States
HWC Women's Research Center
Englewood, Ohio, 45322, United States
HillTop Obstetrics & Gynecology
Franklin, Ohio, 45005-2593, United States
Amy Brenner, MD & Associates, LLC
Mason, Ohio, 45040, United States
AC Clinical Research
Tiffin, Ohio, 44883-2820, United States
Oklahoma University
Oklahoma City, Oklahoma, 73104, United States
Oregon Health and Science University
Portland, Oregon, 97239, United States
St. Luke's Hospital - Allentown Campus
Allentown, Pennsylvania, 18104-9701, United States
Women's Health Care Group of PA
Pottstown, Pennsylvania, 19464, United States
Reading Hospital
West Reading, Pennsylvania, 19611, United States
Women & Infants Hospital (OGCC)
Providence, Rhode Island, 02905, United States
Palmetto Clinical Research (PCR)
Charleston, South Carolina, 29406-9126, United States
OB-GYN Centre of Excellence
Chattanooga, Tennessee, 37404, United States
University of Tennessee Medical Center
Knoxville, Tennessee, 37920, United States
Ben Taub General Hospital
Houston, Texas, 77030, United States
The Woman's Hospital of Texas
Houston, Texas, 77054, United States
Southeast Texas Family Planning and Cancer Screening
Houston, Texas, 77074, United States
Brown Stone Clinical Trials, LLC
Irving, Texas, 75061, United States
Tanner Clinic
Layton, Utah, 84041-8803, United States
Women's Healthcare Associates, LLC - Tualatin
Pleasant Grove, Utah, 84062-4097, United States
Tidewater Clinical Research, Inc.
Virginia Beach, Virginia, 23456, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
This study is descriptive and not designed to detect statistical differences. The analyses are exploratory. Physicians and patients should consider the totality of scientific evidence regarding Essure's safety and effectiveness when making clinical decisions. It is hypothesized that the observed outcomes may align with the known benefit-risk profile of Essure and historical data for laparoscopic tubal sterilization (LTS).
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Therapeutic Area Head
- Organization
- Bayer AG
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Bayer Study Director
Bayer
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2017
First Posted
April 25, 2017
Study Start
May 3, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2024
Study Completion
December 31, 2024
Last Updated
May 22, 2026
Results First Posted
May 22, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Availability of this study's data will later be determined according to Bayer's commitment to the EFPIA/PhRMA "Principles for responsible clinical trial data sharing". This pertains to scope, timepoint and process of data access. As such, Bayer commits to sharing upon request from qualified researchers patient-level clinical trial data, study-level clinical trial data, and protocols from clinical trials in patients for medicines and indications approved in the US and EU as necessary for conducting legitimate research. This applies to data on new medicines and indications that have been approved by the EU and US regulatory agencies on or after January 01, 2014. Interested researchers can use www.vivli.org to request access to anonymized patient-level data and supporting documents from clinical studies to conduct research. Information on the Bayer criteria for listing studies and other relevant information is provided in the member section of the portal.