Loteprednol vs. Prednisolone and Fluorometholone
Efficacy and Safety of Loteprednol 0.5% Gel for Routine Prophylaxis After Photorefractive Keratectomy Compared to Prednisolone Acetate 1% Suspension and Fluorometholone 0.1% Suspension
1 other identifier
interventional
131
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Corneal haze, in which the cornea becomes cloudy, is a well-known and a potentially vision-threatening postoperative complication of photorefractive keratectomy (PRK). Topical ophthalmic corticosteroids are routinely prescribed by most surgeons postoperatively to help prevent this complication. Goals of topical steroids use after PRK include effective modulation of the healing response to prevent corneal haze while at the same time minimizing side effects, such as intraocular pressure elevation or cataract formation. Loteprednol etabonate is a corticosteroid that exerts its therapeutic effects and is then quickly changed into inactive metabolites. This relatively fast metabolism of loteprednol gives it a lower side effect profile than other steroids, including a smaller effect on intraocular pressure. In the ophthalmic literature, there is currently no consensus on a standard regimen or which type of corticosteroid should be used after PRK. Investigators are conducting a prospective, randomized trial to compare the incidence of intraocular pressure rise and visually significant postoperative corneal haze after PRK with the use of loteprednol 0.5% gel compared to the use of earlier generation steroids, prednisolone acetate 1% suspension and fluorometholone 0.1% suspension.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Sep 2014
Longer than P75 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 19, 2014
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 21, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
December 21, 2020
CompletedMay 26, 2021
May 1, 2021
3.8 years
April 17, 2017
August 23, 2020
May 4, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in Intraocular Pressure (IOP) From Baseline Through Month 3
Intraocular pressure will be measured by applanation tonometry
Baseline, 1 week post-op, 1 month post-op, 2 months post-op, 3 months post-op
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Number of Eyes With Corneal Haze
12 months
Uncorrected Visual Acuity
3 months
Best Corrected Visual Acuity at 3 Months
3 months
Study Arms (2)
Loteprednol Etabonate 0.5% Oph Gel
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 1 will use loteprednol 0.5% gel in both eyes, starting at a frequency of four times per day for the first week and then tapered off based on clinical judgement of the corneal healing response.
Prednisolone acetate 1% Oph Susp
ACTIVE COMPARATORGroup 2 will use prednisolone acetate 1% suspension in both eyes, starting at a frequency of four times per day for the first week, then tapered down to a regimen of fluorometholone 0.1% suspension, which will then be tapered off based on clinical judgement of the corneal healing response.
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- All subjects who are deemed suitable candidates for PRK after routine refractive surgery screening will be considered eligible for participation in this study.
- Subjects must be at least 21 years of age and not pregnant or nursing (due to fluctuations in visual parameters during pregnancy).
You may not qualify if:
- Selection will be consistent with the current standard of care for PRK. Any patient that is not a suitable candidate for PRK will not be included.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Moran Eye Center - Midvalley Location
Murray, Utah, 84107, United States
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Mark Mifflin, MD
- Organization
- University of Utah Moran Eye Center
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mark Mifflin, MD
University of Utah Moran Eye Center
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Examiners are masked to the treatment arm when obtaining measurements of intraocular pressure (IOP) and grading corneal haze.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Ophthalmology/Visual Sciences
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 17, 2017
First Posted
April 21, 2017
Study Start
September 19, 2014
Primary Completion
July 1, 2018
Study Completion
July 1, 2018
Last Updated
May 26, 2021
Results First Posted
December 21, 2020
Record last verified: 2021-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share