Study to Compare Active Tymbion Iontophoresis to Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis for Anesthesia of the Tympanic Membrane
ADEPT
A Prospective, Multicenter Study to Evaluate Effectiveness and Safety of Tymbion Iontophoresis and Tympanostomy Tube Placement Using the Tula Iontophoresis and Tube Delivery Systems for Adults in an Office Setting
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
2
Brief Summary
A prospective, multicenter study to determine if active Tymbion iontophoresis is superior to sham Tymbion iontophoresis in providing anesthesia to the tympanic membrane (TM). The study will use the Tula iontophoresis systems for healthy adult volunteers in an office setting, called Group A of Protocol CPR007003. The protocol CPR007003 also includes a Group B study described in a separate Registration (NCT03197558).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for phase_2
Started Apr 2017
2 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 27, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 11, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 11, 2017
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
January 6, 2020
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
14 days
April 5, 2017
December 17, 2019
January 6, 2020
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Subject-reported Visual Analog Scale (VAS) Pain Score Following Tympanic Membrane Tap for Subjects Treated With Active Tymbion Iontophoresis Compared to VAS Score for Subjects Treated With Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis.
The VAS consists of a 100 millimeter (mm) line with a statement at each end representing the extreme limits of pain intensity (where 0 represents "No pain" and 100 represents "The worst imaginable pain"). The subject reports their pain intensity by making a mark along the line and the line is measured to convert the subject response to numeric score (0-100 in millimeters). The data will be summarized as the difference in mean VAS scores between the two treatment groups (active Tymbion iontophoresis compared to sham Tymbion iontophoresis).
Day 0
Study Arms (2)
Active Tymbion Iontophoresis
EXPERIMENTALUnilateral treatment with active iontophoresis of Tymbion (2% lidocaine HCl/ 1:100,000 epinephrine) using the Tusker Medical Tula Iontophoresis System.
Sham Tymbion Iontophoresis
SHAM COMPARATORThe sham iontophoresis procedure will be identical to the active Tymbion iontophoresis in that Tymbion (2% lidocaine/ 1:100,000 epinephrine solution) will be placed in the external ear canal, however the iontophoresis current delivery (which facilitates penetration of drug into the tympanic membrane tissue) will not be activated.
Interventions
The external ear canal will be filled with Tymbion drug solution
The external ear canal will be filled with Tymbion drug solution. The Iontophoresis System (IPS) will be used to deliver current to the Tymbion solution to facilitate drug penetration into the tympanic membrane (TM) tissue to anesthetize (numb) the TM
Eligibility Criteria
You may not qualify if:
- Healthy adults, 18-50 years old
- Subject is able and willing to comply with the protocol and attend all study visits
- Subject is able and willing to provide informed consent
- Subjects with air conduction hearing thresholds of 25 dB HL or better at standard frequencies up to 2000 Hz, and 45 dB or better at 4000 Hz.
- Subject is able to read and understand English
- Pregnant or lactating females.
- Prior ear iontophoresis procedure
- Subjects with conductive hearing loss.
- Subjects with history of sensitivity or allergic reaction to lidocaine HCl, tetracaine, epinephrine, or any hypersensitivity to local anesthetics of the amide type, or any component of the anesthetic drug formulation.
- Familial history of insensitivity to lidocaine or other local anesthetics of the amide type.
- Significantly atrophic, retracted, bimeric, monomeric or atelectatic tympanic membrane.
- Perforated tympanic membrane.
- Subjects with known history of ear surgery or TM condition that has the potential to affect the sensitivity of the TM
- Otitis externa.
- Damaged/denuded skin in the auditory canal.
- +5 more criteria
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tusker Medicallead
Study Sites (2)
Camino ENT
San Jose, California, 95138, United States
Specialty Physician Associates
Bethlehem, Pennsylvania, 18017, United States
MeSH Terms
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- Laura England, PhD
- Organization
- Tusker Medical
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restriction Type
- OTHER
- Restrictive Agreement
- Yes
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 2
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 5, 2017
First Posted
April 18, 2017
Study Start
April 27, 2017
Primary Completion
May 11, 2017
Study Completion
May 11, 2017
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Results First Posted
January 6, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share