NCT03117959

Brief Summary

The purpose of our study is to determine if anatomic/kinematic total knee arthroplasties (TKAs) are superior to mechanical axis-referenced TKAs with respect to determinants of gait functionality, patient satisfaction and other objective tests of knee function as a potential indicator of long-term prosthesis outcomes. To our knowledge there has not been any literature comparing TKAs using the kinematic and mechanical axes with respect to gait analysis. A single study has compared gender-specific TKAs and found that there is no difference with respect to determinants of gait when using these prostheses (Thomsen et al, 2012), but again this study was not based on referencing off of the anatomical/kinematic axis of the knee. Our group is hoping that the small variability that may be detectable with the precision of gait analysis may be used as a predictor of future prosthesis outcome measures.

Trial Health

30
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Timeline
Completed

Started Feb 2014

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
withdrawn

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

February 1, 2014

Completed
2 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 7, 2014

Completed
10 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 1, 2015

Completed
2.2 years until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 18, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 6, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

1 year

First QC Date

April 7, 2014

Last Update Submit

April 4, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • gait analysis

    Treadmill walk

    12 months

Study Arms (2)

Stryker Triathlon Custom Fit Knee

PLACEBO COMPARATOR

implanted in standard fashion

Device: Stryker Triathlon Custom Fit Knee

Stryker shape match

EXPERIMENTAL

no longer RCT

Device: Stryker ShapeMatch Technology

Interventions

Will use this patient-specific guide for alignment with Stryker Triathlon Custom Fit Knee.

Stryker shape match
Stryker Triathlon Custom Fit Knee

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years - 75 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged = 50-75
  • BMI = 20 - 40
  • Preoperative ability to perform certain gait tasks/skills
  • No previous knee surgery or injury on either limb
  • No neuromuscular disease or neurologic disease
  • ASA of 1-2

You may not qualify if:

  • below age 50 and/or above age 75
  • BMI less than 20 or greater than 40
  • ASA of 3 or higher

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Hotel Dieu Hospital

Kingston, Ontario, K7L 5G2, Canada

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Osteoarthritis, Knee

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

OsteoarthritisArthritisJoint DiseasesMusculoskeletal DiseasesRheumatic Diseases

Study Officials

  • Gavin Wood, MD

    Queen's University

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
0

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Principal Investigator

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 7, 2014

First Posted

April 18, 2017

Study Start

February 1, 2014

Primary Completion

February 1, 2015

Study Completion

February 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 6, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations