CSE for Labour Analgesia: A Comparison of Two Intrathecal Regimens
SSS
Combined Spinal Epidural Analgesia in Labour: A Comparison of Two Intrathecal Regimens of Single Shot Spinal
1 other identifier
interventional
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Analgesia in labour is not readily available in many parts of Sub-Saharan Africa. The overall cost of Epidural services in terms of human personnel and financial implication makes this inaccessible to many women in labour. Thus, a cheaper, less technically demanding and easier option that can produce as much satisfaction for the parturient and would allow her participate in the second stage of labour by being able to bare down is being studied. The Single Shot Spinal (SSS) would provide pain relief in these women however its draw back is its time limitation as the option of a top up is not available. Two regimen of drug options would be considered using opioids. These would be compared to see how well they are able to provide analgesia in women who hitherto have had vaginal birth. Their onset, duration of action and possible side effects would be compared. NULL HYPOTHESIS: Single Shot Spinal with Bupivacaine Fentanyl (BF) cannot provide a statistically significant difference in labour analgesia in comparison with Bupivacaine Fentanyl Morphine (BFM) ALTERNATE HYPOTHESIS: Single Shot Spinal with BF can provide a statistically significant difference in labour in comparison with BFM
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for phase_4
Started Nov 2017
Shorter than P25 for phase_4
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 9, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 18, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
November 23, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 27, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
April 25, 2018
CompletedJuly 18, 2018
July 1, 2018
3 months
April 9, 2017
July 15, 2018
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Time to First painless contraction (TFC)
This is the onset of action of the drugs. The time duration from the initiation of the block at time zero to the point where there is significant drop in the Numerical Rating Scale (NRS) to 2 or less
time zero to first painless contraction estimated 15 minutes
Time to First Request for Analgesia (TFA)
This is the duration of action of the block. Time from initiation of the block to time the pain score is up to 6 or more. It is expected that after onset of the block (TFC) the pain would first become negligible or absent and after a period of time, it would gradually increase as the drug wears off. If the pain becomes moderate at a NRS of 6 or the patient requests for analgesia, the time would be noted and the epidural would be activated.
Time zero till NRS > 6 estimated 180 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Delivery before TFA or delivery after TFA
duration of labour estimated 180 minutes
Maternal Satisfaction
up to 300 minutes
Side effects
up to 180 minutes
Study Arms (2)
BF
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions: Intrathecal administration -Bupivacaine 2.5mg (0.5ml) + Fentanyl 25mcg (0.5ml) + 1ml sterile water in one shot Ephedrine 3-5mg in aliquots in the event of hypotension Promethazine 12.5 - 25mg in the event of vomiting or significant pruritus naloxone 2mcg/kg in the event of respiratory distress
BFM
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions: Intrathecal administration - Bupivacaine 2.5mg (0.5ml) + fentanyl 25mcg (0.5ml) + 0.25mg morphine (0.25ml) + 0.75ml sterile water in one shot ephedrine 3-5mg in aliquots for hypotension Promethazine 12.5 - 25mg for vomiting or significant pruritus Naloxone 2mcg/kg in the event of respiratory distress
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Parturients in active labour \>4cm dilatation
- American Society of Anesthesiologists (ASA) classification I and II
You may not qualify if:
- Significant co-morbidities like uncontrolled hypertension or diabetes
- Maternal hemorrhage with hypotension
- Significant bleeding/clotting disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Sarah Beckleylead
Study Sites (1)
Lagos Island Maternity Centre
Lagos, Nigeria
Related Publications (3)
Minty RG, Kelly L, Minty A, Hammett DC. Single-dose intrathecal analgesia to control labour pain: is it a useful alternative to epidural analgesia? Can Fam Physician. 2007 Mar;53(3):437-42.
PMID: 17872679BACKGROUNDLee BB, Ngan Kee WD, Hung VY, Wong EL. Combined spinal-epidural analgesia in labour: comparison of two doses of intrathecal bupivacaine with fentanyl. Br J Anaesth. 1999 Dec;83(6):868-71. doi: 10.1093/bja/83.6.868.
PMID: 10700784BACKGROUNDHess PE, Vasudevan A, Snowman C, Pratt SD. Small dose bupivacaine-fentanyl spinal analgesia combined with morphine for labor. Anesth Analg. 2003 Jul;97(1):247-52, table of contents. doi: 10.1213/01.ane.0000066520.30763.b8.
PMID: 12818975BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Olaniyi Oladapo, MBBS,FMCA, FWACS
School of Anaesthetic Studies, Health Service Commission, Lagos State
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 4
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- a double blinded study. The participant and the Physician giving the treatment who would also evaluate the participant during the duration of the study are masked. However, the Assistant who is in charge of the randomization process and has the code and so would prepare the drugs is not blinded. The non-blinded Assistant would be available to break the code in the event of any adverse reactions.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Senior Registrar and Diplomate, Dept of Anaesthesia, General Hospital, Gbagada Lagos, Nigeria
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 9, 2017
First Posted
April 18, 2017
Study Start
November 23, 2017
Primary Completion
February 27, 2018
Study Completion
April 25, 2018
Last Updated
July 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07