Endocuff Vision Assisted vs. Standard Polyp Resection in the Colorectum
EVASTA
1 other identifier
interventional
250
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Adenomas are premalignant polyps of the colon that should be resected endoscopically. Complete resection of adenomatous polyps is the major task of colonoscopy. In some cases polyp may be poorly accessible making endoscopic resection difficult. Polypectomy may be conducted using the so-called piece meal technique in these cases. However, leaving polyp residual polyps in the colon bears the risk of malignant degeneration as colorectal cancer may arise form adenomatous remnants. In case of difficult polyp locations endoscopic resection may also be time consuming. On the other hand endoscopists are facing an increased time pressure due to rising numbers of procedures during the last decades. The Endocuff Vision device (EVD) is a cap that can be mounted to the tip of a standard endoscope. The EVD has small flexible branches on its outside. The branches turn out during withdrawal. By that the branches are getting in contact with colonic wall. This mechanism leads to a more stabilized position of the colonoscope in the bowel. It is hypothesized that resection circumstances may be improved by using an EVD. In addition, stabilizing the scope during resection may result in a reduced time effort. Until now no controlled trials exist investigating the effect of EVD on the time effect during polyp resection. Therefore a randomized controlled trial needed comparing standard polypectomy versus polypectomy using the EVD during routine colonoscopy procedures.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
June 6, 2019
CompletedJune 11, 2019
June 1, 2019
1.3 years
April 8, 2017
June 7, 2019
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Polyp resection
Time of polyp resection will be measured using a stopwatch.
up to 1 day (participants will be followed for the duration of hospital stay or outpatient treatment, an expected average of 1 day)]
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Polyp detection
up to day 1
Cecal intubation time
up to day 1
Ileum intubation time
up to day 1
Total procedure duration
up to day 1
Complications
up to day 1
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Standard Arm
OTHERStandard colonoscopy without mounted Endocuff Vision device. Therefore standard polypectomy in case of polyp resection.
Endocuff Vision Arm
ACTIVE COMPARATOREndocuff Vision device mounted to the endoscope prior to the beginning of the procedure. Therefore EVD assisted polypectomy in case of polyp resection.
Interventions
EVD mounted to the tip of the endoscope, therefore EVD assisted polypectomy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- indication for colonoscopy
- age ≥ 40 years
You may not qualify if:
- American Society of Anesthesiologists class IV or higher
- pregnant women
- indication for colonoscopy: inflammatory bowel disease
- indication for colonoscopy: polyposis syndrome
- indication for colonoscopy: emergency colonoscopy e.g. acute bleeding
- contraindication for polyp resection e.g. patients on warfarin
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Klinikum rechts der Isar der TU München
Munich, Bavaria, 81657, Germany
Related Publications (1)
von Figura G, Hasenohrl M, Haller B, Poszler A, Ulrich J, Brown H, Abdelhafez M, Schmid RM, von Delius S, Klare P. Endocuff vision-assisted vs. standard polyp resection in the colorectum (the EVASTA study): a prospective randomized study. Endoscopy. 2020 Jan;52(1):45-51. doi: 10.1055/a-1018-1870. Epub 2019 Oct 15.
PMID: 31614373DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Peter Klare, MD
Technical University of Munich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- PREVENTION
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 8, 2017
First Posted
April 17, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
September 1, 2018
Study Completion
June 6, 2019
Last Updated
June 11, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share