NCT03116425

Brief Summary

Investigators hypothesize that personalizing rTMS targets using functional MRI will allow to improve symptoms of patients suffering from chronic catatonia.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
17

participants targeted

Target at below P25 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Apr 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 22, 2017

Completed
26 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 17, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

April 24, 2017

Completed
5.1 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

June 1, 2022

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 1, 2022

Completed
Last Updated

April 20, 2022

Status Verified

April 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

5.1 years

First QC Date

March 22, 2017

Last Update Submit

April 19, 2022

Conditions

Keywords

Precision MedicineFunctional NeuroimagingTranscranial Magnetic Stimulation, RepetitiveTranscranial Direct Current StimulationMonocentricComparative balanced, randomizeddouble-blind cross-over 3 Arms Study

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Clinical global impression (change in severity and improvement)

    Clinical Global Impression - Severity scale (CGI-S) is a 7-point scale that requires the clinician to rate the severity of the patient's illness at the time of assessment, relative to the clinician's past experience with patients who have the same diagnosis. Clinical Global Impression - Improvement scale (CGI-I) is a 7 point scale that requires the clinician to assess how much the patient's illness has improved or worsened relative to a baseline state at the beginning of the intervention

    In term of percentage reduction in symptoms, difference between before (assessed on D1) and after (assessed on D5 to 7) and at 1 month after each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)

Secondary Outcomes (11)

  • Change in personalized daily visual analogical scales assessing the core symptoms.

    Points results will be averaged over the 4 days before and after each therapeutic arm.

  • Change in Bush and Francis Catatonia Rating Scale.

    Points involvement in scale between before (assessed on D1) and after (assessed on D5 to 7) and at 1 month after each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)

  • Change in psychosis: PANSS.

    Points involvement in scale between before (assessed on D1) and after (assessed on D5 to 7) and at 1 month after each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)

  • Change in depression: Calgary Depression Scale.

    Points involvement in scale between before (assessed on D1) and after (assessed on D5 to 7) and at 1 month after each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)

  • Change in apathy: actimetry, apathy inventory and apathy evaluation scale.

    Points involvement in scale between before (assessed on D1) and after (assessed on D5 to 7) and at 1 month after each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol)

  • +6 more secondary outcomes

Other Outcomes (1)

  • Change of rCBF anomalies

    Points involvement in scale between before (assessed once between D-7 to -1) and after (assessed once between D+15 to +21) each therapeutic protocol (D = day of the beginning of the protocol).

Study Arms (3)

Verum 1 - Premotor

EXPERIMENTAL

The target region will be defined by comparing the rCBF scan of the patient to a control population (n = 38). rCBF will be measured using the QUIPS2 arterial spin labeling sequence on a Siemens 3T Verio. The network including the premotor region will be targeted. The therapeutic protocol will be design to correct the rCBF anomaly.

Device: Individualized rTMS on VERUM 1's region or networkProcedure: Individualized rTMS on VERUM 1's region or network

Verum 2 - Prefrontal

EXPERIMENTAL

The target region will be defined by comparing the rCBF scan of the patient to a control population (n = 38). rCBF will be measured using the QUIPS2 arterial spin labeling sequence on a Siemens 3T Verio. The network including the prefrontal region will be targeted. The therapeutic protocol will be design to correct the rCBF anomaly.

Device: Individualized rTMS on VERUM 2's region or networkProcedure: Individualized rTMS on VERUM 2's region or network

Placebo

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Stimulation of a region with normal rCBF and putatively unrelated to catatonic symptoms (parietal cortex).

Device: Individualized rTMS on PLACEBO regionProcedure: Individualized rTMS on PLACEBO region

Interventions

To increase cortical rCBF, iTB (intermittent theta burst) will be used: triplet at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz in trains of 2 sec with an inter-train interval of 8 sec. To decrease cortical rCBF, cTB (continuous theta burst) will be used: triplet at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz in trains of 40 sec. Intensity 120% of passive threshold (or 150% of active threshold). Stimulation protocol will be used up to 5 times per session to allow a reasonable regional or network coverage. Patients will have 4 sessions per day on 5 successive days per arm.

Also known as: Putative premotor region or network
Verum 1 - Premotor

To increase cortical rCBF, iTB (intermittent theta burst) will be used: triplet at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz in trains of 2 sec with an inter-train interval of 8 sec. To decrease cortical rCBF, cTB (continuous theta burst) will be used: triplet at 50 Hz repeated at 5 Hz in trains of 40 sec. Intensity 120% of passive threshold (or 150% of active threshold). Stimulation protocol will be used up to 5 times per session to allow a reasonable regional or network coverage. Patients will have 4 sessions per day on 5 successive days per arm.

Also known as: Putative prefrontal region or network
Verum 2 - Prefrontal

Region will be modulated up or down according to the stimulation protocol used in VERUM 1 and 2 conditions. Stimulation will be replicated up to 5 times per session. Patients will have 4 sessions per day on 5 successive days per arm.

Also known as: (One per line)
Placebo

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 70 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Aged from 18 to 70 Y
  • Affiliated to the health insurance
  • Having signed an informed consent
  • Suffering from catatonia according to the DSM5, unremitted since \> 2Y
  • Unresponsive or incomplete remission after at least one trial of benzodiazepine and/or Electroconvulsivotherapy
  • Treatment stable for \> 6 weeks

You may not qualify if:

  • Contraindication for MRI, rTMS or tDCS: non-removable ferromagnetic body, prosthesis, pacemaker, medication delivered by an implanted pump clip or vascular stent, heart valve or ventricular shunt, seizure disorders, skin pathology in the region of tDCS electrode placement.
  • Pregnancy
  • Severe and non-stabilized somatic pathology
  • Patients deprived of liberty or hospitalized without their consent
  • Patients unable to give informed consent.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

CEMNIS

Strasbourg, 67091, France

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Catatonia

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Neurobehavioral ManifestationsNeurologic ManifestationsNervous System DiseasesSigns and SymptomsPathological Conditions, Signs and SymptomsBehavioral SymptomsBehavior

Study Officials

  • Jack FOUCHER, MD

    Hôpitaux Universitaires de Strasbourg

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
TRIPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 22, 2017

First Posted

April 17, 2017

Study Start

April 24, 2017

Primary Completion

June 1, 2022

Study Completion

June 1, 2022

Last Updated

April 20, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations