Study Stopped
Lack of human ressources
Compare the Performance of Targeted Biopsy Versus Aspiration Biopsy With a Pipette for the Diagnosis of Endometrial Cancer
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
2 countries
4
Brief Summary
Endometrial cancer is the most common pelvic gynecological cancer in so-called developed countries, with 320,000 new cases annually, including more than 1,500 in Belgium. It preferentially affects postmenopausal women. Overall survival at 5 years is 76% but is 95% for early forms, which represent more than 70% of diagnoses. The main risk factors are obesity, diabetes and tamoxifen intake for breast cancer, which explains the increasing incidence. Half a million new annual cases are expected in 2035. The main symptom is postmenopausal metrorrhagia.Among these women, the prevalence of the disease is estimated between 10 and 15%. Currently the recommendations are to make an evaluation by endovaginal ultrasound followed by an endometrial biopsy. The histological type is the main predictor of the severity of the disease and acts as guideline for the treatment.It is therefore essential to have precise biopsy results before starting therapeutic management. The most widely used technique is the blind biopsy by aspiration using a pipette because it is inexpensive, easy, without any specific equipment. However, recent studies showed that this technique has a poor sensitivity in the target population of postmenopausal women. Other studies have shown that targeted biopsies under hysteroscopic control could have a much higher sensitivity. The main objective of this study is thus to compare the performance of the targeted biopsy under hysteroscopy to the performance of the biopsy by aspiration with a pipette, for the diagnosis of endometrial cancer.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jul 2018
4 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 11, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 14, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
July 10, 2018
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 2, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 2, 2020
CompletedAugust 7, 2020
August 1, 2020
1.6 years
April 11, 2017
August 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Histological result
Histological result (histological type and grading if cancer is diagnosed, according to the FIGO 2009 classification).
6 months
Study Arms (1)
postmenopausal patients with metrorrhagia
EXPERIMENTALPostmenopausal patients with metrorrhagia and endometrial hypertrophy defined by an endometrium ticker than 3 mm (ultrasound result). The threshold choice of 3 mm was chosen according to a recent review of the literature to limit the risk of false negatives for cancer.
Interventions
Patients willing to participate to the study will benefit from a double biopsy. The first biopsy will be a blind biopsy performed by aspiration with a Cornier pipette.
During the same consultation, patients will benefit from a diagnostic hysteroscopy with vaginoscopy and saline (allowing a wash of the debris caused by the pipette biopsy), using a rigid hysteroscope of 4.3 mm equipped with an operator channel allowing the passage of a biopsy tong.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- postmenopausal patient.
- patient with postmenopausal metrorrhagia and endometrial hypertrophy defined by an endometrium ticker than 3 mm (ultrasound result)
You may not qualify if:
- patients undergoing hormone replacement therapy for menopause (THM). This treatment may be the cause of benign bleeding in post menopause.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (4)
CHU Brugmann
Brussels, 1020, Belgium
Hôpitaux Iris Sud - Site Ixelles
Brussels, 1050, Belgium
CHR Citadelle
Liège, 4000, Belgium
Hôpital Bicêtre
Le Kremlin-Bicêtre, 94275, France
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
André Nazac, MD
CHU Brugmann
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NA
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- DIAGNOSTIC
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Head of clinic
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 11, 2017
First Posted
April 14, 2017
Study Start
July 10, 2018
Primary Completion
March 2, 2020
Study Completion
March 2, 2020
Last Updated
August 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-08
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share