Testing the Efficacy of Pokemon Go for Increasing Physical Activity

NCT03109509 | Completed

• 2 other identifiers: 2016077685K25HL122305
• Study Type: interventional
• Target: 100
• Locations: 0 countries
• Sites: N/A

Brief Summary

Historically, increasing activity was synonymous with exercise; however, it is now thought that even much more modest activity levels (e.g., simply walking) or merely decreasing the proportion of sedentary time may be sufficient to decrease future morbidity and mortality. Some interventions designed to increase activity have shown promise; others have been less successful. But even promising interventions are often difficult to generalize to real-life clinical settings. One barrier to monitoring the effectiveness of interventions has been the lack of availability of accurate, reliable and inexpensive personal activity monitoring equipment. The availability of inexpensive pedometers, and, more recently, low cost triaxial accelerometers, has now made it much easier to monitor activity levels and provide feedback to users. These devices are ideal for capturing activity associated with walking, the most popular and acceptable form of exercise, but only if patients actually wear them. Thus, there is a need to develop pragmatic approaches that encourage patients to not only wear these monitoring devices, but also motivate them to increase their activity. In recent years, games have been used in a variety of settings to motivate and change behavior. Games not only provide performance feedback to patients, but also provide incentives for achieving goals in a context that is fun, intrinsically rewarding, and easy to understand. Successful games effectively exploit motivating social factors (e.g., competition, peer support, and entertainment) to maintain interest and engage participants. Steps are counted using a commercially available triaxial accelerometer (e.g., a FitBit). Pokemon Go is an augmented reality game that encourages players to go outside to search for Pokemon creatures.

Conditions

Sedentary Lifestyle

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

• Average daily steps

  Daily steps measured by Fitbit Zip

  Eight weeks

Study Arms (2)

Fitbit-only Group

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

Participants randomized to the FB group were provided a Fitbit Zip activity monitor and were instructed on how to wear the monitor, how to pair the activity monitor to their smartphone, and asked to provide our team consent to access their Fitbit data through Fitbit's Application Programming Interface (API)

Behavioral: Fitbit Only

Fitbit + Pokémon Go Group

EXPERIMENTAL

Participants randomized to the FB+P group received the same Fitbit Zip activity monitor and text message reminders as the FB group. This group was also shown how to download the Pokémon Go application to their smartphone and were provided brief instructions on how to play the game. Participants were instructed to simply explore the game and play it at their leisure. Participants were not provided any specific goals related to game play or physical activity in general.

Behavioral: Fitbit + Pokemon Go

Interventions

Fitbit + Pokemon Go BEHAVIORAL

Participants received a Fitbit Zip to wear daily for 8 weeks. Participants also received access to the Pokemon Go game.

Fitbit + Pokémon Go Group

Fitbit Only BEHAVIORAL

Participants received a Fitbit Zip to wear daily for 8 weeks.

Fitbit-only Group

Eligibility Criteria

• Age: 18 Years - 80 Years
• Sex: all
• Healthy Volunteers: Yes
• Age Groups: Adult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

• years of age, healthy adults, own smart phone, have access to the Internet, fluent in English, no contraindications to physical activity, not pregnant or planning to become pregnant, had not previously played Pokemon Go game

You may not qualify if:

• \<18 year or older than 80 years of age, did not own smart phone, did not have access to the Internet, not fluent in English, any contraindications to physical activity, pregnant or planning to become pregnant in next 2 months, had previously played Pokemon Go game

Sponsors & Collaborators

• University of Iowa: lead
• National Heart, Lung, and Blood Institute (NHLBI): collaborator

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Sedentary Behavior

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Behavior

Study Design

• Study Type: interventional
• Phase: not applicable
• Allocation: RANDOMIZED
• Masking: SINGLE
• Who Masked: INVESTIGATOR
• Masking Details: Research team was blinded to participant group assignment until data analysis.
• Purpose: PREVENTION
• Intervention Model: PARALLEL
• Sponsor Type: OTHER
• Responsible Party: PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
• PI Title: Assistant Professor

Model Details: Two-group, randomized controlled trial.

Study Record Dates

• First Submitted: April 5, 2017
• First Posted: April 12, 2017
• Study Start: July 20, 2016
• Primary Completion: October 30, 2016
• Study Completion: April 1, 2017
• Last Updated: April 28, 2017

Record last verified: 2017-04

Data Sharing

• IPD Sharing: Will not share