NCT03109405

Brief Summary

The purpose of this study was to examine the Veinplicity Device as an adjunctive IV cannulation tool in subjects with a history of difficult to access veins. The Veinplicity Device is intended to improve venous access rates in compromised patients by taking advantage of the increased circulation that results from provoked muscle stimulation. The study collected information about the device, intravenous access, user and patient perceptions for IV access, and any device or procedural complications or other adverse events. Device use was examined with patients in both a prone and upright position.

Trial Health

100
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2015

Shorter than P25 for not_applicable

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 1, 2015

Completed
2 months until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 1, 2015

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

August 1, 2015

Completed
9 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 21, 2016

Completed
12 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 12, 2017

Completed
Last Updated

April 5, 2018

Status Verified

April 1, 2018

Enrollment Period

2 months

First QC Date

April 21, 2016

Last Update Submit

April 3, 2018

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (2)

  • Rate of successful venous access on the first attempt.

    7 days

  • Rate of adverse events associated with either the treatment or the venous access site.

    7 days

Secondary Outcomes (5)

  • User Perception of IV cannulation difficulty,

    7 days

  • Subject Preception of IV cannulation pain

    7 days

  • Subject Perception of Device stimulation

    7 days

  • Time required to achieve successful IV cannula placement

    time from initial puncture to successful IV cannulation

  • Number of attempts required to achieve successful IV cannula placement

    over a 24 hour period

Study Arms (2)

stimulation-assisted

EXPERIMENTAL

All subjects received treatment (stimulation-assisted) with the Veinplicity Device per the Instructions for Use. The subject underwent standard IV cannulation using a 20 gauge cannula into the available vein immediately after completion of device stimulation. Use of a tourniquet was at the discretion of the nurse performing the IV cannulation.

Device: Stimulation-assisted venous accessOther: 20 guage cannula for IV, tourniquet optional

standard IV cannulation

OTHER

The subject underwent standard IV cannulation using a 20 gauge cannula into the best available vein. Use of a tourniquet was at the discretion of the nurse performing the IV cannulation.

Other: 20 guage cannula for IV, tourniquet optional

Interventions

Stimulation-assisted venous access

Also known as: Veinplicity Device
stimulation-assisted

Standard IV cannulation using 20 ga needle, and use of tourniquet at discretion of nurse performing IV cannulation

standard IV cannulationstimulation-assisted

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Subject ≥ 18 years of age
  • Subject with history of failed venous access, venipuncture, or IV cannula placement
  • Subject agreed to required follow-up
  • Subject provided written, informed consent

You may not qualify if:

  • Subject currently had compromised skin on either forearm or hand
  • Subject currently on any blood thinning medication other than 81mg of aspirin
  • Subject had been diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy, has had a complex fracture or surgery in the forearm, or has other condition that diminishes sensation in one or both arms, hands or fingers
  • Subject had a demand type pacemaker or defibrillator
  • Subject is female of child-bearing potential and had a positive urine pregnancy test
  • Subject had a history of seizure, convulsions or epilepsy
  • Subject had a known allergy to Epsom salts
  • Subject had any other condition that may affect the ability to complete study requirements

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Officials

  • Leela Vrishabhendra, MD

    Medpace Medical Device

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
SUPPORTIVE CARE
Intervention Model
CROSSOVER
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 21, 2016

First Posted

April 12, 2017

Study Start

June 1, 2015

Primary Completion

August 1, 2015

Study Completion

August 1, 2015

Last Updated

April 5, 2018

Record last verified: 2018-04

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share