Assess Veinplicity Venous Access Device Safety and Effectiveness
A Prospective, Single Center, Randomized, Cross-over Clinical Trial to Assess the Safety and Effectiveness of the Veinplicity Venous Access Device
1 other identifier
interventional
200
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study was to examine the Veinplicity Device as an adjunctive IV cannulation tool in subjects with a history of difficult to access veins. The Veinplicity Device is intended to improve venous access rates in compromised patients by taking advantage of the increased circulation that results from provoked muscle stimulation. The study collected information about the device, intravenous access, user and patient perceptions for IV access, and any device or procedural complications or other adverse events. Device use was examined with patients in both a prone and upright position.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jun 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
August 1, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
August 1, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
April 21, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 12, 2017
CompletedApril 5, 2018
April 1, 2018
2 months
April 21, 2016
April 3, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Rate of successful venous access on the first attempt.
7 days
Rate of adverse events associated with either the treatment or the venous access site.
7 days
Secondary Outcomes (5)
User Perception of IV cannulation difficulty,
7 days
Subject Preception of IV cannulation pain
7 days
Subject Perception of Device stimulation
7 days
Time required to achieve successful IV cannula placement
time from initial puncture to successful IV cannulation
Number of attempts required to achieve successful IV cannula placement
over a 24 hour period
Study Arms (2)
stimulation-assisted
EXPERIMENTALAll subjects received treatment (stimulation-assisted) with the Veinplicity Device per the Instructions for Use. The subject underwent standard IV cannulation using a 20 gauge cannula into the available vein immediately after completion of device stimulation. Use of a tourniquet was at the discretion of the nurse performing the IV cannulation.
standard IV cannulation
OTHERThe subject underwent standard IV cannulation using a 20 gauge cannula into the best available vein. Use of a tourniquet was at the discretion of the nurse performing the IV cannulation.
Interventions
Stimulation-assisted venous access
Standard IV cannulation using 20 ga needle, and use of tourniquet at discretion of nurse performing IV cannulation
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject ≥ 18 years of age
- Subject with history of failed venous access, venipuncture, or IV cannula placement
- Subject agreed to required follow-up
- Subject provided written, informed consent
You may not qualify if:
- Subject currently had compromised skin on either forearm or hand
- Subject currently on any blood thinning medication other than 81mg of aspirin
- Subject had been diagnosed with peripheral neuropathy, has had a complex fracture or surgery in the forearm, or has other condition that diminishes sensation in one or both arms, hands or fingers
- Subject had a demand type pacemaker or defibrillator
- Subject is female of child-bearing potential and had a positive urine pregnancy test
- Subject had a history of seizure, convulsions or epilepsy
- Subject had a known allergy to Epsom salts
- Subject had any other condition that may affect the ability to complete study requirements
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Physeon GmbHlead
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Leela Vrishabhendra, MD
Medpace Medical Device
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- INDUSTRY
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
April 21, 2016
First Posted
April 12, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2015
Primary Completion
August 1, 2015
Study Completion
August 1, 2015
Last Updated
April 5, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share