NCT03108196

Brief Summary

Bladder cancer is a common malignant tumor of the urinary system, radical resection plus urinary diversion is the first choice of treatment for muscle invasive bladder cancer. Urinary diversion of surgical options related to patient' survival and quality of life. In 1988, Hautmann firstly reported an orthotopic urinary diversion method: Hautmann neobladder. As the urine can be controlled from the original urethra, the patient's quality of life has been greatly improved, so the new bladder surgery gradually accepted and welcomed by urologists and patients. However, in order to achieve low-pressure and large-volume storage capacity of the urine reservoir, the 40-70cm long interception of terminal ileum need to be detubularized. Only after split, folded, re-stitched and a series of treatment, the intestinal can be used. Such complicated procedures make so many urologists give it up. In addition, the interception of the long ileum may lead to reduced absorption of vitamin B12 which caused anemia, metabolic acidosis, intestinal dysfunction. Not only that, as time goes by, this kind of neobladder will be unlimited expansion and resulting in a serious increase in residual urine volume, hydronephrosis, or even the occurrence of neobladder spontaneous rupture. In 2000, professor Chunxiao Liu invented "detaenial sigmoid neobladder", this surgical method overset the traditional intestinal detubularization approach, which detached the serosal layer with smooth muscle from the bowel without split it. This kind of neobladder is easier to construct and have less impact on intestinal function. So far, it has been implemented for more than 600 cases in Zhujiang hospital, the age of patients range from 9 months (bladder rhabdomyosarcoma) to 84 years old. So far as now, no multicenter prospective clinical study on orthotopic urinary diversion has been performed worldwide, neither the head-to-head studies on detaenial sigmoid neobladder and ileal neobladder. Our project is going to perform a multicenter randomized controlled trial for these two neobladder methods and look forward to assess the safety and efficacy of these two procedures which provide an objective basis for the patients undergoing orthotopic urinary diversion in the future.

Trial Health

57
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
96

participants targeted

Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started May 2018

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

April 5, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

April 11, 2017

Completed
1.1 years until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

May 2, 2018

Completed
7.3 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

August 30, 2025

Completed
1 month until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

September 30, 2025

Completed
Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Status Verified

August 1, 2024

Enrollment Period

7.3 years

First QC Date

April 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

November 30, 2024

Conditions

Keywords

bladder cancer, neobladder, detaenial sigmoid, ileal

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Post void residual volume of neobladder

    Residual urine volume after spontaneous urination with urinary diversion in the 36th month

    the 36th month

Secondary Outcomes (3)

  • Time cost

    24 hour

  • EBL

    24 hour

  • Short term complications

    90 day postoperative

Study Arms (2)

sigmoid

EXPERIMENTAL

Use 15 cm detaenial sigmoid colon to reconstructed a "U" shape neobladder after radical cystectomy.

Procedure: sigmoid

ileal

EXPERIMENTAL

Use 70 cm distal ileal segment to reconstructed a "spherical" shape neobladder after radical cystectomy.

Procedure: ileal

Interventions

sigmoidPROCEDURE

The serosal layer with smooth muscle was detached from a 15 cm sigmoid segment submucosal layer and removed continuously. Only the mucosal and submucosal layers were preserved. Approximately 2 cm of the taeniae and serosal layer were preserved to strengthen the urethra-neobladder anastomosis at the central portion of the isolated sigmoid and at the two ends for the ureter-neobladder anastomosis. The ureters were subsequently implanted in antirefluxing fashion in a submucosal tunnel. The ureter-neobladder anastomoses were protected with a 6Fr Single J® stent. The two ends of the sigmoid were closed with the embedded seromuscular layer. The neobladder was anastomosed to the urethra after that.

sigmoid
ilealPROCEDURE

The isolated 70 cm terminal ileum segment is arranged in either an M or W shape and is opened along the antimesenteric border except for a 5 cm section where the incision is curved to make a U-shaped flap. The four limbs of the M or W are then sutured to one another with a running absorbable suture. A small full-thickness segment of bowel is excised for the urethral anastomosis. Once the ileal neobladder is situated and the urethral sutures are tied, the ureters are implanted from inside the neobladder through a small incision in the ileum. The remaining portion of the anterior wall is then closed with a running absorbable suture. Ureteroileal anastomosis were performed with a freely refluxing, open end-to-side method at each end of the W.

ileal

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 100 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Bladder carcinoma in situ, include CIS and T1G3 tumor, muscle invasive bladder cancer(T2/T3N0-1M0)
  • Recurrent bladder cancer
  • Other conditions that have been approved by a urologist for indications for new bladder surgery
  • Had been received intravesical chemotherapy, intra-arterial infusion chemotherapy or systemic chemotherapy in the past.
  • Voluntarily signed the informed consent -

You may not qualify if:

  • Preoperative serum creatinine more than 2.26mg/dl(Or 200μmol/L)
  • Cancer invaded urethral (confirmed by the pathology)
  • Non - bladder cancer patients underwent neobladder
  • A history of other malignant tumors within five years
  • Ileum / sigmoid chronic inflammation, like ulcerative colitis or intestinal tuberculosis, and so on.
  • Other conditions that have been approved by a urologist for not suitable for new bladder surgery

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Zhujiang Hospital

Guangzhou, Guangdong, 510282, China

RECRUITING

Related Publications (12)

  • Siegel RL, Miller KD, Jemal A. Cancer statistics, 2016. CA Cancer J Clin. 2016 Jan-Feb;66(1):7-30. doi: 10.3322/caac.21332. Epub 2016 Jan 7.

    PMID: 26742998BACKGROUND
  • Witjes JA, Comperat E, Cowan NC, De Santis M, Gakis G, Lebret T, Ribal MJ, Van der Heijden AG, Sherif A; European Association of Urology. EAU guidelines on muscle-invasive and metastatic bladder cancer: summary of the 2013 guidelines. Eur Urol. 2014 Apr;65(4):778-92. doi: 10.1016/j.eururo.2013.11.046. Epub 2013 Dec 12.

    PMID: 24373477BACKGROUND
  • Hautmann RE, Egghart G, Frohneberg D, Miller K. The ileal neobladder. J Urol. 1988 Jan;139(1):39-42. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)42283-x.

    PMID: 3336101BACKGROUND
  • Zerhau P, Husar M. [Mucus production consequences in cystoplasties and continent urinary diversions in children--long term experiences]. Rozhl Chir. 2006 Mar;85(3):148-50. Czech.

    PMID: 16689148BACKGROUND
  • Haupt G, Pannek J, Knopf HJ, Schulze H, Senge T. Rupture of ileal neobladder due to urethral obstruction by mucous plug. J Urol. 1990 Sep;144(3):740-1. doi: 10.1016/s0022-5347(17)39571-x.

    PMID: 2388342BACKGROUND
  • Xu K, Liu CX, Zheng SB, Li HL, Xu YW, Xu AB, Chen BS, Shen HY. Orthotopic detaenial sigmoid neobladder after radical cystectomy: technical considerations, complications and functional outcomes. J Urol. 2013 Sep;190(3):928-34. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2013.03.072. Epub 2013 Mar 26.

    PMID: 23538237BACKGROUND
  • Xu A, Li B, Li H, Zheng S, Du W, Xu Y, Zou Y, Luo Q, Liu C. Comparison of seromuscular tunnel and split-cuff nipple antireflux ureteroenteral anastomosis techniques in orthotopic taenia myectomy sigmoid neobladder: a prospective, randomized study. Urology. 2013 Mar;81(3):669-74. doi: 10.1016/j.urology.2012.11.018. Epub 2013 Jan 3.

    PMID: 23290142BACKGROUND
  • Skinner EC, Fairey AS, Groshen S, Daneshmand S, Cai J, Miranda G, Skinner DG. Randomized Trial of Studer Pouch versus T-Pouch Orthotopic Ileal Neobladder in Patients with Bladder Cancer. J Urol. 2015 Aug;194(2):433-9. doi: 10.1016/j.juro.2015.03.101. Epub 2015 Mar 28.

    PMID: 25823791BACKGROUND
  • Bacchetti P, Leung JM. Sample size calculations in clinical research. Anesthesiology. 2002 Oct;97(4):1028-9; author reply 1029-32. doi: 10.1097/00000542-200210000-00050. No abstract available.

    PMID: 12357184BACKGROUND
  • Julious SA. Sample sizes for clinical trials with normal data. Stat Med. 2004 Jun 30;23(12):1921-86. doi: 10.1002/sim.1783.

    PMID: 15195324BACKGROUND
  • Miyake H, Furukawa J, Sakai I, Muramaki M, Yamashita M, Inoue TA, Fujisawa M. Orthotopic sigmoid vs. ileal neobladders in Japanese patients: a comparative assessment of complications, functional outcomes, and quality of life. Urol Oncol. 2013 Oct;31(7):1155-60. doi: 10.1016/j.urolonc.2011.11.015. Epub 2011 Dec 6.

    PMID: 22153716BACKGROUND
  • Clavien PA, Barkun J, de Oliveira ML, Vauthey JN, Dindo D, Schulick RD, de Santibanes E, Pekolj J, Slankamenac K, Bassi C, Graf R, Vonlanthen R, Padbury R, Cameron JL, Makuuchi M. The Clavien-Dindo classification of surgical complications: five-year experience. Ann Surg. 2009 Aug;250(2):187-96. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0b013e3181b13ca2.

    PMID: 19638912BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Urinary Bladder Neoplasms

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Urologic NeoplasmsUrogenital NeoplasmsNeoplasms by SiteNeoplasmsFemale Urogenital DiseasesFemale Urogenital Diseases and Pregnancy ComplicationsUrogenital DiseasesUrinary Bladder DiseasesUrologic DiseasesMale Urogenital Diseases

Study Officials

  • Abai Xu, doctor

    Zhujiang Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

Abai Xu, doctor

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Model Details: Superiority verification based on the ileal neobladder
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

April 5, 2017

First Posted

April 11, 2017

Study Start

May 2, 2018

Primary Completion

August 30, 2025

Study Completion

September 30, 2025

Last Updated

December 4, 2024

Record last verified: 2024-08

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

All released data will be available for other researchers.

Locations