MR Imaging- Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) Therapy of Bone Metastases
1 other identifier
interventional
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
Bone metastasis give rise to major complications that lead to significant morbidity and impairment of life quality. The most common primary for bone metastasis is prostate, lung and breast carcinoma. These three have the highest cancer incidence in the USA with up to 85% prevalence of bone metastases at the time of death. Pain from these osseous lesions can be related to mechanical or chemical factors. Pressure effects on the periosteum or adjacent neural structures can cause local or radiating pain. Hemorrhage from local bone osteolysis by osteoclastic activity causes a local release of bradykinin, prostaglandins, histamine and substance P that can irritate the endosteal nerves as well as local nerves. The life expectancy of patients with osseous metastatic disease is variable but can be substantially longer for patients with multiple myeloma, breast or prostate cancer. Therefore, finding an effective local therapy that can improve patient quality of life and can be done at a single outpatient sitting would be beneficial. The current and emerging treatments for osseous metastases may be considered in several categories: radiotherapy, systemic chemotherapy (cytotoxic, hormonal and radionuclides), surgical stabilization and percutaneous tumor ablation. These treatments may be applied in isolation but also frequently in combination. MRI Guided High Intensity Focused Ultrasound (HIFU) is a completely non-invasive technology for thermal ablation. HIFU is capable of concentrating ultrasonic pressure waves to a specified region without any physical penetration of the body. The converging ultrasonic pressure wave is converted to thermal energy at the specific depth, resulting in local heating at the focus. Temperature elevation is proportional to the proton resonance frequency shift, therefore MR imaging provides accurate technique for target definition and energy deposition control. MRI guided Focused Ultrasound therapy is being performed in treatment of uterine leiomyomas (fibroids). Recently the method has gained both AMAR authorization and FDA approval, and CE approval for that indication. Clinical trials of HIFU in bone metastases have indicated that the method is safe and gives an effective reduction of patient pain. The short- and long-term effects on tumor volume and morphology do not seem to have been evaluated thus far. The primary objective of this trial is to evaluate effectiveness of MRI guided HIFU in the treatment of metastatic bone tumors
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started May 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 15, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 30, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 30, 2022
CompletedApril 24, 2017
April 1, 2017
4.7 years
March 8, 2017
April 21, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change in subjective pain relieve
Change in Visual analog scale pretreatment vs follow-up
6 months
Secondary Outcomes (5)
Change in tumor morphology in imaging
6 months
Change in pain medication usage
6 months
Change in general subjective health
6 months
Change in cytokine-levels
1 month
Change in tumor-specific markers
1 month
Other Outcomes (1)
Adverse effects
6 months
Study Arms (2)
HIFU-treatment
EXPERIMENTAL* Pre-treatment imaging * Pre-treatment questionnaires and laboratory blood samples * Intervention (Thermal ablation of bone metastasis with MR-HIFU device Philips Sonalleve coupled with Philips Ingenia 3.0T) * Follow-up (imaging, questionnaires, laboratory) * Follow-up pain medication usage
Radiation therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATOR* Pre-treatment imaging * Pre-treatment questionnaires and laboratory blood samples * Intervention (Varian Truebeam Radiotherapy System) * Follow-up (imaging, questionnaires, laboratory) * Follow-up pain medication usage
Interventions
Procedure is performed under proper analgesia (general or local anesthesia). The intervention can be performed in areas accessible with ultrasound with no critical structures (nerves, vasculature, bowels) in proximity. Limbs and pelvis are most usually accepted locations. Patient is adjusted on top of the HIFU-transducer connected to MRI. First a MR-scan is performed and the treatment procedure is planned on consol. Then under MRI-guidance a point by point ablation of the target tumor is performed. During the treatment a real-time thermometry is obtained in order to avoid unwanted heating of related structures and to observe sufficient effect on treatment zone. After treatment MR-scan with gadolinium is performed to evaluate the size of ablated area.
Conventional radiotherapy focused on bone tumor. Pretreatment planning images acquired with computer tomography
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Bone metastasis
- Maximum three metastasis to be treated
- Pain that clearly locates to certain metastatic lesion
- Intolerable pain regardless of radiotherapy and adequate pain medication
You may not qualify if:
- ASA-group III or higher or anesthesia during procedure is required
- Metastasis not safely reachable with HIFU
- \- Diffusely spread metastasis on bone
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (26)
Nielsen OS, Munro AJ, Tannock IF. Bone metastases: pathophysiology and management policy. J Clin Oncol. 1991 Mar;9(3):509-24. doi: 10.1200/JCO.1991.9.3.509.
PMID: 1705581BACKGROUNDMantyh P. Bone cancer pain: causes, consequences, and therapeutic opportunities. Pain. 2013 Dec;154 Suppl 1:S54-S62. doi: 10.1016/j.pain.2013.07.044. Epub 2013 Jul 31.
PMID: 23916671BACKGROUNDMercadante S, Fulfaro F. Management of painful bone metastases. Curr Opin Oncol. 2007 Jul;19(4):308-14. doi: 10.1097/CCO.0b013e3281214400.
PMID: 17545792BACKGROUNDTwycross RG. Management of pain in skeletal metastases. Clin Orthop Relat Res. 1995 Mar;(312):187-96.
PMID: 7543391BACKGROUNDChow E, Harris K, Fan G, Tsao M, Sze WM. Palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases: a systematic review. J Clin Oncol. 2007 Apr 10;25(11):1423-36. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2006.09.5281.
PMID: 17416863BACKGROUNDChow E, Zeng L, Salvo N, Dennis K, Tsao M, Lutz S. Update on the systematic review of palliative radiotherapy trials for bone metastases. Clin Oncol (R Coll Radiol). 2012 Mar;24(2):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.clon.2011.11.004. Epub 2011 Nov 29.
PMID: 22130630BACKGROUNDHuisman M, van den Bosch MA, Wijlemans JW, van Vulpen M, van der Linden YM, Verkooijen HM. Effectiveness of reirradiation for painful bone metastases: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Int J Radiat Oncol Biol Phys. 2012 Sep 1;84(1):8-14. doi: 10.1016/j.ijrobp.2011.10.080. Epub 2012 Jan 31.
PMID: 22300568BACKGROUNDMueller PR, Stark DD, Simeone JF, Saini S, Butch RJ, Edelman RR, Wittenberg J, Ferrucci JT Jr. MR-guided aspiration biopsy: needle design and clinical trials. Radiology. 1986 Dec;161(3):605-9. doi: 10.1148/radiology.161.3.3786706.
PMID: 3786706BACKGROUNDKettenbach J, Silverman SG, Schwartz RB, Hsu L, Koskinen SK, Kikinis R, Black PM, Jolesz FA. [Design, clinical suitability and future aspects of a 0.5 T MRI special system for interventional use]. Radiologe. 1997 Oct;37(10):825-34. doi: 10.1007/s001170050289. German.
PMID: 9454276BACKGROUNDAlanen J, Keski-Nisula L, Blanco-Sequeiros R, Tervonen O. Cost comparison analysis of low-field (0.23 T) MRI- and CT-guided bone biopsies. Eur Radiol. 2004 Jan;14(1):123-8. doi: 10.1007/s00330-003-1960-2. Epub 2003 Jun 25.
PMID: 12827428BACKGROUNDJolesz FA, Silverman SG. Interventional magnetic resonance therapy. Semin Intervent Radiol 1995;12: 20-2
BACKGROUNDKahn T, Bettag M, Ulrich F, Schwarzmaier HJ, Schober R, Furst G, Modder U. MRI-guided laser-induced interstitial thermotherapy of cerebral neoplasms. J Comput Assist Tomogr. 1994 Jul-Aug;18(4):519-32. doi: 10.1097/00004728-199407000-00002.
PMID: 8040431BACKGROUNDKettenbach J, Kuroda K, Hata N, Morrison P, McDannold NJ, et al. Laserinduced thermotherapy of cerebral neoplasia under MR tomographic control. Min. Invas. Ther. Allied Technol. 1998; 7/6:589- 98
BACKGROUNDAscher PW, Justich E, Schrottner O. Interstitial thermotherapy of central brain tumors with the Nd:YAG laser under real-time monitoring by MRI. J Clin Laser Med Surg. 1991 Feb;9(1):79-83. doi: 10.1089/clm.1991.9.79. No abstract available.
PMID: 10150912BACKGROUNDLi C, Wu L, Song J, Liu M, Lv Y, Sequeiros RB. MR imaging-guided cryoablation of metastatic brain tumours: initial experience in six patients. Eur Radiol. 2010 Feb;20(2):404-9. doi: 10.1007/s00330-009-1554-8. Epub 2009 Aug 21.
PMID: 19697040BACKGROUNDBreen MS, Lazebnik RS, Fitzmaurice M, Nour SG, Lewin JS, Wilson DL. Radiofrequency thermal ablation: correlation of hyperacute MR lesion images with tissue response. J Magn Reson Imaging. 2004 Sep;20(3):475-86. doi: 10.1002/jmri.20143.
PMID: 15332256BACKGROUNDElias WJ, Huss D, Voss T, Loomba J, Khaled M, Zadicario E, Frysinger RC, Sperling SA, Wylie S, Monteith SJ, Druzgal J, Shah BB, Harrison M, Wintermark M. A pilot study of focused ultrasound thalamotomy for essential tremor. N Engl J Med. 2013 Aug 15;369(7):640-8. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa1300962.
PMID: 23944301BACKGROUNDHynynen K, Darkazanli A, Unger E, Schenck JF. MRI-guided noninvasive ultrasound surgery. Med Phys. 1993 Jan-Feb;20(1):107-15. doi: 10.1118/1.597093.
PMID: 8455489BACKGROUNDKuroda K, Abe K, Tsutsumi S, Ishihara Y, Suzuki Y, Sato K. Water proton magnetic resonance spectroscopic imaging. Biomed Thermol 1993;13:43 - 62.
BACKGROUNDHindman JC. Proton resonance shift of water in the gas and liquid states. J Chem Phys 1966;44:4582 - 92.
BACKGROUNDChung AH, Hynynen K, Colucci V, Oshio K, Cline HE, Jolesz FA. Optimization of spoiled gradient-echo phase imaging for in vivo localization of a focused ultrasound beam. Magn Reson Med. 1996 Nov;36(5):745-52. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910360513.
PMID: 8916025BACKGROUNDMcDannold N, Clement GT, Black P, Jolesz F, Hynynen K. Transcranial magnetic resonance imaging- guided focused ultrasound surgery of brain tumors: initial findings in 3 patients. Neurosurgery. 2010 Feb;66(2):323-32; discussion 332. doi: 10.1227/01.NEU.0000360379.95800.2F.
PMID: 20087132BACKGROUNDKohler MO, Mougenot C, Quesson B, Enholm J, Le Bail B, Laurent C, Moonen CT, Ehnholm GJ. Volumetric HIFU ablation under 3D guidance of rapid MRI thermometry. Med Phys. 2009 Aug;36(8):3521-35. doi: 10.1118/1.3152112.
PMID: 19746786BACKGROUNDHuisman M, Lam MK, Bartels LW, Nijenhuis RJ, Moonen CT, Knuttel FM, Verkooijen HM, van Vulpen M, van den Bosch MA. Feasibility of volumetric MRI-guided high intensity focused ultrasound (MR-HIFU) for painful bone metastases. J Ther Ultrasound. 2014 Oct 10;2:16. doi: 10.1186/2050-5736-2-16. eCollection 2014.
PMID: 25309743BACKGROUNDPeters RD, Hinks RS, Henkelman RM. Ex vivo tissue-type independence in proton-resonance frequency shift MR thermometry. Magn Reson Med. 1998 Sep;40(3):454-9. doi: 10.1002/mrm.1910400316.
PMID: 9727949BACKGROUNDIkink ME, Voogt MJ, Verkooijen HM, Lohle PN, Schweitzer KJ, Franx A, Mali WP, Bartels LW, van den Bosch MA. Mid-term clinical efficacy of a volumetric magnetic resonance-guided high-intensity focused ultrasound technique for treatment of symptomatic uterine fibroids. Eur Radiol. 2013 Nov;23(11):3054-61. doi: 10.1007/s00330-013-2915-x. Epub 2013 Jun 21.
PMID: 23793518BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Gaber Komar, PhD, MD
TYKS/VSKK (Turku University Hospital / Proper Finlands Imaging center)
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Mira Huhtala, MD, PhD student
TYKS Oncology (Turku University Hospital)
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Heikki Minn, Professor, MD
TYKS Oncology
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Teija O Sainio, MSc, PhD Student
TYKS/VSKK (Turku University Hospital / Proper Finlands Imaging center)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER GOV
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2017
First Posted
April 10, 2017
Study Start
May 15, 2017
Primary Completion
January 30, 2022
Study Completion
March 30, 2022
Last Updated
April 24, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Possible collaboration in the future with Karolinska Institute, Stockholm, during later stages of the study when performing randomized experiments. Data to be shared would be MRI- and CT-data, laboratory results and health-questionnaire results.