Understanding How Anaesthesia Affects ECT Outcomes
1 other identifier
interventional
54
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will examine how anaesthetic technique affects ECT outcomes. Specifically, the investigators will examine how: 1) the time interval between anaesthetic and ECT stimulus, and 2) the ventilation rate before ECT stimulus, impacts on the quality of the EEG (this is a recording of brain activity during ECT and is used to judge the quality of a seizure and to guide individual patient dosing).
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for phase_3 depression
Started Mar 2017
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
February 27, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 15, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 15, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 15, 2019
CompletedMarch 30, 2023
March 1, 2023
2 years
February 27, 2017
March 28, 2023
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
EEG Seizure Quality Rating using the EEG Seizure Quality Rating Sheet utilised by MacPherson et al
EEG quality will be rated manually for each ECT treatment undertaken by a participant until the conclusion of their ECT course. This rating will be done using the EEG Seizure Quality Rating Sheet utilised by MacPherson et al - low dose lignocaine added to propofol does not attenuate the response to electroconvulsive therapy; Journal of Affective Disorders, 2010; 126: 330-333
Outcome measures will be collected immediately after each ECT treatment from the first treatment until the end of the ECT course, an estimated total of four to six weeks for most participants
Study Arms (4)
Short time interval + Normal ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORShort time interval + Hyperventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORLong time interval + Normal ventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORLong time interval + Hyperventilation
ACTIVE COMPARATORInterventions
The intervention in this study is the time interval between anaesthetic administration and ECT stimulus
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients treated with a course of ECT
You may not qualify if:
- Use of non-standard anaesthetic agents in ECT (e.g. ketamine)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- The University of New South Waleslead
- Wesley Missioncollaborator
Study Sites (1)
Wesley Hospital Kogarah
Sydney, New South Wales, 2217, Australia
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Colleen Loo, MBBS
The University of New South Wales
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- phase 3
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- Both participants and the outcome assessor (analysing EEGs) will be blinded.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- CROSSOVER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
February 27, 2017
First Posted
April 7, 2017
Study Start
March 15, 2017
Primary Completion
March 15, 2019
Study Completion
March 15, 2019
Last Updated
March 30, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share