Effect of Using a Lower Limb Robotic Device for Patients With Chronic Stroke
Effect of a Community-based, Bionic Leg Rehabilitation Program on Biomechanical, Cardiovascular and Performance Outcomes in Patients With Chronic Stroke
1 other identifier
interventional
40
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study will investigate if a lower limb robotic device can be used in a community setting to increase the amount of physical activity that individuals undertake following stroke and consequently improve biomechanical, physiological and health outcomes, in patients with stroke.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Apr 2017
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 7, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
April 24, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
July 1, 2019
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
July 1, 2019
CompletedJanuary 18, 2020
January 1, 2020
2.2 years
March 2, 2017
January 16, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (3)
Change from baseline Gait analysis at 10-weeks post-intervention
Eight Qualisys cameras (six Oqus 3+, two Oqus 5+, Goteborg, Sweden) will be used to measure joint angles, rotations, hip obliquity, segment accelerations and velocities. Six Degrees or Fredom 6DoF 27 point marker set will be used and joint centres identified through palpation. The participants will be asked to walk for 6 meters for minimum of three trials in order to obtain walking gait patterns.
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each gait analysis assessment will take 30 minutes
Change from baseline Gait analysis at 10-weeks post-intervention
The participants will be asked to walk for 6 meters, over a pressure mat (RSscan Footscan, Ipswitch, UK), for minimum of three trials in order to obtain walking gait patterns.
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each gait analysis assessment will take 30 minutes
Change from baseline Gait analysis at 10-weeks post-intervention
A BTS G-Walk (Brooklyn, New York) sensor will also be worn by the participants to collect additional spatio-temporal gait parameters(cadence, speed, stride/step length, stance/swing phase duration, single/double support duration and pelvic girdle angles).
aseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each gait analysis assessment will take 30 minutes
Secondary Outcomes (10)
Timed-up-and-go
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. The timed-up-and-go assessment will take 10 minutes
Ashworth scale
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each assessment will take 10 minutes
Body mass
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each assessment will take 5 minutes
Central and peripheral blood pressures
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each assessment will take 5 minutes following 20 minutes supine rest.
Arterial stiffness and blood velocity of the carotid artery
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up. Each assessment will take 5 minutes following 20 minutes supine rest.
- +5 more secondary outcomes
Other Outcomes (8)
Dynamic gait index
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
Berg Balance
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
Balance Confidence Scale
Baseline, 10-week post-intervention, 3-month follow-up, 12 month follow-up
- +5 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Alter G Bionic Leg
EXPERIMENTALParticipants randomised to a group including normal therapy (physiotherapy) and the use of a Alter G robotic bionic leg. All participants have previously completed normal NHS therapy.
Normal therapy
ACTIVE COMPARATORParticipants randomised to a group including normal therapy (physiotherapy) only. All participants have previously completed normal NHS therapy.
Usual care
NO INTERVENTIONHave completed normal NHS therapy and no longer (\> 6 months) receive active physiotherapy.
Interventions
Participants are randomized to a 10 week, community-based bionic leg programme. Participants must use the leg for a minimum of 1 hour per day and continue to have active physical therapy sessions.
Participants are randomized to a normal therapy (physiotherapy) only program. Participants are also advised to undertake 1 hour a day of physical activity and have active physical therapy (physiotherapy) sessions.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Patients with diagnosis of stroke within 3-60 months
- Community patients that are medically stable and currently receiving therapeutic input from Hobbs Rehabilitation
- Individuals who are able to stand and step with an aid or assistance
- Cognitively aware of task demands
- Height: 5ft 2-6ft 3 (158-192 cm)
- Weight: \<25 stone (\< 159kg)
You may not qualify if:
- Unresolved deep vein thrombosis
- Unstable cardiovascular conditions
- Open wounds
- Active drug resistant infection
- Recent fractures of involved limb
- Peripheral arterial disease
- Incontinence
- Severe osteoporosis
- Non weight bearing
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Winchesterlead
- Hobbs Rehabilitationcollaborator
- AlterGcollaborator
- University of Gloucestershirecollaborator
- University of Chestercollaborator
- University of Southamptoncollaborator
- University of North Carolina, Chapel Hillcollaborator
Study Sites (1)
University of Winchester
Winchester, Hampshire, SO22 4NR, United Kingdom
Related Publications (1)
Faulkner J, Wright A, Stone K, Fryer S, Martinelli L, Lambrick D, Paine E, Stoner L. Effect of home-based, overground robotic-assisted gait training on vascular health in people with chronic stroke. Front Neurol. 2023 Mar 10;14:1093008. doi: 10.3389/fneur.2023.1093008. eCollection 2023.
PMID: 36970545DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
James Faulkner, PhD
University of Winchester
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- DOUBLE
- Who Masked
- INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2017
First Posted
April 7, 2017
Study Start
April 24, 2017
Primary Completion
July 1, 2019
Study Completion
July 1, 2019
Last Updated
January 18, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share