Comprehensive Follow-up of Low Income Families. A Cluster-randomized Study
CRCT-HOLF
A Cluster-randomised Study Evaluating the Effectiveness of a Skill-training Programme for Social Work Professionals for Improving the Follow-up of Low Income Families Within Norwegian Welfare Services
1 other identifier
interventional
884
1 country
29
Brief Summary
In a cluster-randomized design, the study evaluates the effectiveness of a skill- training program for social work professionals with the aim of improving the follow-up of low income families within Norwegian labor and welfare services. While the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration are responsible for developing and implementing the program, researchers at Oslo and Akershus University College are conducting an independent evaluation of its effectiveness. By close follow up and better coordination of existing services the model aims to improve the financial and housing situation of the family, labor market attachment among the parents and the social inclusion of children. The cluster-randomized field experiment will take place over a 40-month period, involving 29 labor and welfare offices, 58 family coordinators and, based on estimations, 650 families. The research is funded by the Norwegian Labor and Welfare Administration. The project is financed by Labour and Welfare Administration and led by Ira Malmberg-Heimonen, Faculty of Social Sciences. Participants in the project are: Ira Malmberg-Heimonen (project leader), Anne Grete Tøge, Krisztina Gyüre, Knut Fossestøl, Marianne Rugkåsa, Berit Bergheim and Tone Liodden.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Jan 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
29 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 6, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 30, 2021
CompletedSeptember 27, 2022
September 1, 2022
6 years
March 7, 2017
September 26, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Changes in the employment situation from baseline to follow-ups
Percentage employed
T2 (+12 months after baseline), T3 (+24 months) T4 (+36 months) -T5 (+48 months)
Change in the housing situation between baseline and follow-up
Objective and subjective estimations of housing quality
T2 (+12 months after baseline)
Change in the financial situation between baseline and follow-ups
Income per month at follow-ups
T2 (+12 months after baseline), T3 (+24 months) T4 (+36 months) T5 (+48 months)
Change in children's situation from baseline to follow-up
Participation in kindergarden and other free-time activities
T2 (+12 months)
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change in professional competence between baseline and follow-up
T2 (+18 months)
Change in the level of working alliance between baseline and follow-up
T2 (+18 months)
Other Outcomes (1)
Changes in leaders competence between baseline and follow-up
T2 (+18 months)
Study Arms (2)
Comprehensive follow-up program
EXPERIMENTAL15 offices have been randomized to experimental group. Experimental group offices implement the HOLF model developed by the Labor and Welfare Administration
Local family projects
ACTIVE COMPARATOR14 offices have been randomized to control group. these implement local family projects. These are developed based on local practice needs
Interventions
The main follow-up areas within the HOLF-program is to improve employment, housing, financial situation of the children. Beside manuals, family coordinators participate in five seminars with home-based tasks in between. Alo a comprehensive supervision structure is implemented that follow the train the trainer model. Coordinators ought to work directly with th families, but also with other actors important to the family, such as child-welfare and school. Coordinators should use specific tools improving the quality of the meetings, such as forms for preparation of meetings, being goal-focused and empowering.
The control group offices will develop local family projects, depending on local needs. they will also recruit and follow-up families.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Each of the 29 offices identified a target group of families prior to randomization based on the following characteristics:
- reliance on social assistance as a main source of income at least for six of the latest 12 months, or
- received social assistance in addition to other types of welfare support at least for six of the latest 12 months, and
- have up to four children under the age of 16. Based on these criteria offices identified a total of 3201 families.
You may not qualify if:
- Families were excluded from participation in the project if:
- they participate in other comprehensive family projects
- one or both parents/caregivers are under treatment because of heavy substance abuse and/or serious mental disorders
- the child or the children are temporary placed in child welfare institutions or living with relatives or other caregivers.
- the family is under investigation by child welfare authorities, due to suspected child neglect or that a placement to new caregivers is in process.
- Based on these criteria 320 families were excluded.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (29)
NAV Asker
Asker, Norway
NAV Bærum
Baerum, Norway
NAV Bergenhus
Bergen, Norway
NAV Fana
Bergen, Norway
NAV Bodø
Bodø, Norway
NAV Elverum
Elverum, Norway
NAV Gjøvik
Gjøvik, Norway
NAV Halden
Halden, Norway
NAV Harstad
Harstad, Norway
NAV Haugesund
Haugesund, Norway
NAV Horten
Horten, Norway
NAV Larvik
Larvik, Norway
NAV Lillehammer
Lillehammer, Norway
NAV Skjedsmo
Lillestrøm, Norway
NAV Rana
Mo i Rana, Norway
NAV Moss
Moss, Norway
NAV Alna
Oslo, Norway
NAV Bjerke
Oslo, Norway
NAV Frogner
Oslo, Norway
NAV Gamle Oslo
Oslo, Norway
NAV Gruneløkka
Oslo, Norway
NAV Nordstrand
Oslo, Norway
NAV St. Hanshaugen
Oslo, Norway
NAV Ringsaker
Ringsaker, Norway
NAV Sandefjord
Sandefjord, Norway
NAV Sandnes
Sandnes, Norway
NAV Madla
Stavanger, Norway
NAV Lerkendal
Trondheim, Norway
NAV Værnes
Værnes, Norway
Related Links
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Masking Details
- While the leaders and family-coordinators are aware of whether the office has been randomized to experimental or control group offices, the families are masked for this information. they are only aware of participating in a family project, but not if experimental or control condition.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SINGLE GROUP
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor, Soc Sci dr.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2017
First Posted
April 6, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2016
Primary Completion
December 30, 2021
Study Completion
December 30, 2021
Last Updated
September 27, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-09
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
After embargo + 5 years after finishing study (2026)