Comparison: Constant-rate Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing VS Variable-rate Feedback Infusion Plus Demanding Dosing
1 other identifier
interventional
78
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In the case of the newlys developed PCA, the infusion rate is increased according to the patient's need for bolus button, so that the pain can be controlled more efficiently.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Dec 2016
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
December 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 5, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 29, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 29, 2017
CompletedJuly 18, 2018
July 1, 2018
12 months
March 8, 2017
July 16, 2018
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Demanded numbers of bolus button
Change from immediately to 24 hours after operation
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Pain intensity
Change from immediately to 24 hours after operation
Study Arms (2)
Constant-rate Infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORINTERVENTION : Constant-rate Infusion mode : The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period
Variable-rate Feedback Infusion
ACTIVE COMPARATORINTERVENTION : Variable-rate Feedback Infusion mode :The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period
Interventions
The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time. It can increment or decrement rate(0.2ml/hr) by press bolus button during a 48 h period
The PCA regimen consisted of fentanyl 20 μg/kg and Ramosetron Hcl 0.3 mg (total volume including saline: 100 ml) and was programmed to deliver 1 ml /h as a background infusion and a bolus of 1.5 ml on-demand, with a 15 min lockout time during a 48 h period
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Spine fusion surgery at Chung-Ang University Hospital with IV- PCA under general anesthesia
You may not qualify if:
- Unrecorded type of anesthetic agent
- Denial to the study
- Brain disorder
- Cardiopulmonary disease
- Psychiatric disorders
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Chung-Ang University Hospital
Seoul, 156-755, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- SUPPORTIVE CARE
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2017
First Posted
April 5, 2017
Study Start
December 30, 2016
Primary Completion
December 29, 2017
Study Completion
December 29, 2017
Last Updated
July 18, 2018
Record last verified: 2018-07