Traumatic Splenic Injury and Management (SPLENIQ Study)
SPLENIQ
1 other identifier
observational
106
1 country
10
Brief Summary
OBJECTIVE: To determine the quality of life (QOL) and clinical outcome after conservative therapy, embolization (proximal versus distal) or surgery in patients with traumatic splenic injury. Secondary aims: (I) to examine therapy-related complications, (II) to establish the necessity of additional therapies, (III) the assessment of splenic function related to splenic morphology (MR imaging) after embolization and (IV) to find the prognostic factors for failure of non-operative management (NOM) in patients with splenic injuries. Finally, with the acquired data from this study a patient-oriented protocol will be provided for the management of traumatic splenic injury. HYPOTHESIS: The investigators expect that NOM is superior to surgery with regard to QOL, clinical outcome and splenic function. Embolization will need more additional therapies. Splenic morphology is related to splenic immune function. Expected prognostic factors are age above 40, ISS \>25 and a splenic injury grade of 3 or higher. STUDY DESIGN: A combination of a retrospective and a prospective multicentre cohort study. This protocol involves the prospective part of the study. STUDY POPULATION/DATASET: Patients who enter the participating hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 with splenic injury will be asked to participate. The follow-up period will be one year with regard to QOL, clinical symptoms and imaging. INTERVENTION: All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points. The patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization (SAE) will undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment. OUTCOME MEASURES: Primary outcome is QOL. Secondary outcomes are clinical symptoms and imaging. SAMPLE SIZE: Approximately 100 patients will be included per year during the inclusion phase. DATA ANALYSIS: With regard to the prospective data linear modelling will be performed. COLLABORATION/CONNECTION: Tilburg University, Erasmus Medical Center Rotterdam, Maasstad Hospital Rotterdam, Albert Schweitzer Hospital Dordrecht, Amphia hospital Breda, Leiden University Medical Center, VU University Medical Center Amsterdam, Medical Spectrum Twente, Radboud University Nijmegen, Isala Zwolle. TIME SCHEDULE: Year 1: literature search and conducting the retrospective study and analyses. Years 1-3: inclusion prospective study and follow-up of patients. Year 4: finishing follow-up data collection and analysing.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Longer than P75 for all trials
10 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 22, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
April 4, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2020
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2020
CompletedApril 1, 2022
March 1, 2022
3.8 years
March 22, 2017
March 31, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (7)
Quality of Life: baseline (within 1 week after treatment)
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire, SF-12 and EQ-5D-5L questionnaires
One week after treatment
Quality of life: 1 month follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
One month after treatment
Quality of life: 3 months follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Three months after treatment
Quality of life: 6 months follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
Six months after treatment
Quality of life: one year follow-up
WHOQoL-Bref questionnaire
One year after treatment
Change in health status: SF-12
SF-12 questionnaire
One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
Change in health related quality of life: EQ-5D-5L
EQ-5D-5L questionnaire
One week, 1 month and 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Clinical Outcome
One year follow-up
Cost-effectiveness
One year follow-up
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one month after treatment)
One month after embolization
Imaging Outcome after Embolization (one year after treatment)
One year after embolization
Splenic Artery Embolization characteristics
One year follow-up
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Non-Operative Management (NOM)/Observational
Patients "treated" observationally for (traumatic) spleen injury.
Splenic Artery Embolization
Patients treated with splenic artery embolization for (traumatic) spleen injury.
Surgery
Patients treated surgically for (traumatic) spleen injury.
Interventions
All patients will complete a number of questionnaires at different time points. * SF-12, WHOQoL-Bref, EQ-5D-5L, iPCQ, iMCQ * 1 week, 1 month, 3, 6 and 12 months after treatment
Patients who were treated with splenic artery embolization will also undergo an MRI one month and one year after treatment.
Eligibility Criteria
All patients with splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma confirmed by ultrasound (US/FAST) and/or computed tomography (CT) at the primary trauma screening at the 5 selected hospitals between March 2017 and December 2018 will be asked to participate in this study as soon as they can talk and are lucid. Patients receive a verbal and written explanation about the study. The time for consideration is one week. When a patient is willing to participate he/she will be asked to sign a consent form. When patients agree to participate, they are included for follow-up.
You may qualify if:
- Splenic injury after blunt abdominal trauma (confirmed by FAST and/or CT)
- The patient underwent NOM/SAE/splenectomy for the management of traumatic splenic injury
- The treatment took place in the period from March 2017 to December 2018 at one of the five selected hospitals
- years or older.
You may not qualify if:
- Insufficient knowledge of the Dutch language
- Patients who died during or after treatment are (of course) excluded for questionnaires and MRI, not for clinical outcomes
- \- Patients treated with SAE: patients who do not want to or are not able to undergo an MRI abdomen (for example pregnant women or other contraindications for MRI). Patients excluded for MRI still need to fill out the questionnaires. Also, their clinical outcomes will be processed in the database.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Elisabeth-TweeSteden Ziekenhuislead
- Erasmus Medical Centercollaborator
- Maasstad Hospitalcollaborator
- Albert Schweitzer Hospitalcollaborator
- Amphia Hospitalcollaborator
- Tilburg Universitycollaborator
- Leiden University Medical Centercollaborator
- Amsterdam UMC, location VUmccollaborator
- Medisch Spectrum Twentecollaborator
- Radboud University Medical Centercollaborator
- Isalacollaborator
Study Sites (10)
Radboud University Medical Center
Nijmegen, Gelderland, 6525 GA, Netherlands
Amphia Hospital
Breda, North Brabant, 4800 RL, Netherlands
Elisabeth-Twee Steden Hospital
Tilburg, North Brabant, 5000 LC, Netherlands
VU University Medical Center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1081 HV, Netherlands
Medical Spectrum Twente
Enschede, Overijssel, 7512 KZ, Netherlands
Isala
Zwolle, Overijssel, 8025 AB, Netherlands
Albert Schweitzer Hospital
Dordrecht, South Holland, 3300 AK, Netherlands
Leiden University Medical Center
Leiden, South Holland, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Erasmus MC
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3000 CA, Netherlands
Maasstad Hospital
Rotterdam, South Holland, 3007 AC, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Raaijmakers CP, Lohle PN, Lodder P, de Vries J. Quality of Life and Clinical Outcome After Traumatic Spleen Injury (SPLENIQ Study): Protocol for an Observational Retrospective and Prospective Cohort Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(5):e12391. doi: 10.2196/12391.
PMID: 31066709DERIVED
Related Links
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jolanda de Vries, Prof. dr.
Project leader (ETZ Tilburg, Tilburg University)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 22, 2017
First Posted
April 4, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2020
Study Completion
December 31, 2020
Last Updated
April 1, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share