NCT03097081

Brief Summary

Rationale: There is no evidence in the current literature regarding the additional value of an orthosis after surgically treated thoracolumbar spine fractures. Objective: To assess whether an orthosis provides additional pain relief compared to no orthosis after posteriorly fixated thoracolumbar spine fractures. Primary outcome is difference in pain at six weeks post-operatively. Secondary objectives are pain at other moments, pain medication used, pain related disability, quality of life, long-term kyphosis, possible complications, hospital stay, return to work and subjective feeling on benefit or disadvantage from the orthosis. Study design: Randomized controlled intervention study, non-inferiority trial. Study population: Dutch speaking patients presented at the VU university medical centre, 18 - 65 years old with a traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture from Th7 - L4 surgically treated by posterior fixation. Intervention: One group receives standard care and wears an orthosis after surgery for 12 weeks, to use when in vertical position. The intervention group does not wear an orthosis after surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study outcome is the difference in pain noted on the NRS-score at six weeks, ≥ 2 (SD 2,5) change corresponds with a clinically significant change in pain score. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The current guideline for postoperative care regarding dorsal stabilization of spine fractures recommends the use of a post-operative orthosis. While patients generally receive an orthosis for 12 weeks, individual surgeon's believes sometimes gives reason to deviate from this guideline. This is founded by literature that increasingly questions the use of orthoses in the conservative treatment of spine fractures. With the fracture operatively stabilized, the orthosis mainly provides support of gesture and thereby potentially results in pain relief and confidence for patients. On the other hand some patients have a hard time weaning from the orthosis or report discomfort due to the device and prefer not to use it. With subjects being randomized between the use of an orthosis or no orthosis there is no additional risk. This is in part because it is hypothesized that there is no difference in postoperative pain and there might be a lower risk of complications related to the orthosis.

Trial Health

77
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
45

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
6mo left

Started Nov 2016

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
recruiting

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

Study Progress95%
Nov 2016Nov 2026

Study Start

First participant enrolled

November 1, 2016

Completed
5 months until next milestone

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 20, 2017

Completed
11 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 31, 2017

Completed
7.8 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 1, 2025

Completed
1.8 years until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

November 1, 2026

Expected
Last Updated

January 25, 2023

Status Verified

January 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

8.2 years

First QC Date

March 20, 2017

Last Update Submit

January 21, 2023

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Pain (NRS)

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (4)

  • Pain (NRS)

    Post-operative, 2 & 12 weeks

  • Quality of life (EQ-5D)

    Post-operative, 12 weeks & 6, 12 months

  • Back pain related function (ODI)

    Post-operative, 2, 6, 12 weeks & 6, 12 months

  • Kyphosis (Cobb-angle)

    Pre-operative, post-operative, 6, 12 weeks & 6, 12 months

Study Arms (2)

No orthosis

EXPERIMENTAL

The intervention consists of a deviation of the standard protocol; patients post-operatively do not receive an orthosis.

Other: No orthosis

Orthosis

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

As in correspondence with local and international guidelines, patients receive an orthosis as standard post-operative care. This is considered the control group.

Device: Orthosis

Interventions

The intervention consists of a deviation of the standard protocol; patients do not receive a post-operative orthosis

No orthosis
OrthosisDEVICE

Patients receive post-operative care following the standard protocol and wear an orthosis for 10-12 weeks.

Orthosis

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 65 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Age 18 - 65 years
  • Traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture from thoracic 7 - lumbar 4
  • AO fracture types A-C
  • Undergoing surgical dorsal fixation for fracture

You may not qualify if:

  • Inadequate knowledge of Dutch language or to fill in questionnaire
  • Complete or partial spinal cord injury (ASIA A to D)
  • (Additional) anterior surgical stabilization
  • Thoracolumbar fracture of other aetiology than traumatic, e.g. pathologic, infectious
  • Not able to walk before fracturing vertebra
  • Unable to come to the outpatient clinic (e.g. residing outside the Netherlands)
  • Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16
  • Brain injury with Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) ≥ 4
  • Solitary Lumbar 5 fracture
  • Inability to wear an orthosis, most probable reasons:
  • BMI \> 35
  • Thoraco-abdominal wounds (through trauma or secondary from surgery) on places at which the orthosis contacts the body so aggravation of pain or chances of infection increase significantly.
  • of 27
  • Pre-existing spine deformities (scoliosis or very severe kyphosis/lordosis) which impair the use of the orthosis or aggravate pain.

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

VU University medical center

Amsterdam, North Holland, 1018HV, Netherlands

RECRUITING

Related Publications (1)

  • Smits AJ, Deunk J, Stadhouder A, Altena MC, Kempen DHR, Bloemers FW. Is postoperative bracing after pedicle screw fixation of spine fractures necessary? Study protocol of the ORNOT study: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e019596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019596.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Spinal Fractures

Interventions

Orthotic Devices

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Spinal InjuriesBack InjuriesWounds and InjuriesFractures, Bone

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Orthopedic EquipmentSurgical EquipmentEquipment and Supplies

Central Study Contacts

AJ Smits, MD

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
NONE
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
MD

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 20, 2017

First Posted

March 31, 2017

Study Start

November 1, 2016

Primary Completion

January 1, 2025

Study Completion (Estimated)

November 1, 2026

Last Updated

January 25, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-01

Locations