ORthosis vs No Orthosis After Surgically Treated Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures
ORNOT
Orthosis Versus no Orthosis After Dorsally Fixated Traumatic Thoracolumbar Fractures
1 other identifier
interventional
45
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Rationale: There is no evidence in the current literature regarding the additional value of an orthosis after surgically treated thoracolumbar spine fractures. Objective: To assess whether an orthosis provides additional pain relief compared to no orthosis after posteriorly fixated thoracolumbar spine fractures. Primary outcome is difference in pain at six weeks post-operatively. Secondary objectives are pain at other moments, pain medication used, pain related disability, quality of life, long-term kyphosis, possible complications, hospital stay, return to work and subjective feeling on benefit or disadvantage from the orthosis. Study design: Randomized controlled intervention study, non-inferiority trial. Study population: Dutch speaking patients presented at the VU university medical centre, 18 - 65 years old with a traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture from Th7 - L4 surgically treated by posterior fixation. Intervention: One group receives standard care and wears an orthosis after surgery for 12 weeks, to use when in vertical position. The intervention group does not wear an orthosis after surgery. Main study parameters/endpoints: Main study outcome is the difference in pain noted on the NRS-score at six weeks, ≥ 2 (SD 2,5) change corresponds with a clinically significant change in pain score. Nature and extent of the burden and risks associated with participation, benefit and group relatedness: The current guideline for postoperative care regarding dorsal stabilization of spine fractures recommends the use of a post-operative orthosis. While patients generally receive an orthosis for 12 weeks, individual surgeon's believes sometimes gives reason to deviate from this guideline. This is founded by literature that increasingly questions the use of orthoses in the conservative treatment of spine fractures. With the fracture operatively stabilized, the orthosis mainly provides support of gesture and thereby potentially results in pain relief and confidence for patients. On the other hand some patients have a hard time weaning from the orthosis or report discomfort due to the device and prefer not to use it. With subjects being randomized between the use of an orthosis or no orthosis there is no additional risk. This is in part because it is hypothesized that there is no difference in postoperative pain and there might be a lower risk of complications related to the orthosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Nov 2016
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
November 1, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 20, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 31, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 1, 2025
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
November 1, 2026
ExpectedJanuary 25, 2023
January 1, 2023
8.2 years
March 20, 2017
January 21, 2023
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Pain (NRS)
6 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (4)
Pain (NRS)
Post-operative, 2 & 12 weeks
Quality of life (EQ-5D)
Post-operative, 12 weeks & 6, 12 months
Back pain related function (ODI)
Post-operative, 2, 6, 12 weeks & 6, 12 months
Kyphosis (Cobb-angle)
Pre-operative, post-operative, 6, 12 weeks & 6, 12 months
Study Arms (2)
No orthosis
EXPERIMENTALThe intervention consists of a deviation of the standard protocol; patients post-operatively do not receive an orthosis.
Orthosis
ACTIVE COMPARATORAs in correspondence with local and international guidelines, patients receive an orthosis as standard post-operative care. This is considered the control group.
Interventions
The intervention consists of a deviation of the standard protocol; patients do not receive a post-operative orthosis
Patients receive post-operative care following the standard protocol and wear an orthosis for 10-12 weeks.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Age 18 - 65 years
- Traumatic thoracolumbar spine fracture from thoracic 7 - lumbar 4
- AO fracture types A-C
- Undergoing surgical dorsal fixation for fracture
You may not qualify if:
- Inadequate knowledge of Dutch language or to fill in questionnaire
- Complete or partial spinal cord injury (ASIA A to D)
- (Additional) anterior surgical stabilization
- Thoracolumbar fracture of other aetiology than traumatic, e.g. pathologic, infectious
- Not able to walk before fracturing vertebra
- Unable to come to the outpatient clinic (e.g. residing outside the Netherlands)
- Injury Severity Score (ISS) ≥ 16
- Brain injury with Abbreviated Injury Score (AIS) ≥ 4
- Solitary Lumbar 5 fracture
- Inability to wear an orthosis, most probable reasons:
- BMI \> 35
- Thoraco-abdominal wounds (through trauma or secondary from surgery) on places at which the orthosis contacts the body so aggravation of pain or chances of infection increase significantly.
- of 27
- Pre-existing spine deformities (scoliosis or very severe kyphosis/lordosis) which impair the use of the orthosis or aggravate pain.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
VU University medical center
Amsterdam, North Holland, 1018HV, Netherlands
Related Publications (1)
Smits AJ, Deunk J, Stadhouder A, Altena MC, Kempen DHR, Bloemers FW. Is postoperative bracing after pedicle screw fixation of spine fractures necessary? Study protocol of the ORNOT study: a randomised controlled multicentre trial. BMJ Open. 2018 Jan 13;8(1):e019596. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2017-019596.
PMID: 29331975DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Central Study Contacts
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- MD
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 20, 2017
First Posted
March 31, 2017
Study Start
November 1, 2016
Primary Completion
January 1, 2025
Study Completion (Estimated)
November 1, 2026
Last Updated
January 25, 2023
Record last verified: 2023-01