Closed Reduction With Anesthesia and no Anesthesia for Developmental Dislocation of the Hip < 6 Months
Clinical Analysis of Two Methods for Closed Reduction of Developmental Dislocation of the Hip by Prolonged Traction < 6 Months----An Multicenter Prospective Observational Study
1 other identifier
observational
30
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The purpose of this study is to compare the efficacy of closed reduction with anesthesia and no anesthesia for developmental dislocation of the hip \< 6 months
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for all trials
Started Mar 2017
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 10, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 30, 2017
CompletedMarch 30, 2017
March 1, 2017
Same day
March 10, 2017
March 29, 2017
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Successful treatment
obtain and maintain reduction of the hip following bracing with no subsequent surgical treatment
Through study completion, an average of 2 year.
Secondary Outcomes (1)
Radiographic evaluation
Through study completion, an average of 2 year.
Other Outcomes (1)
The complication
Through study completion, an average of 2 year.
Study Arms (2)
anesthesia
The children were treated with closed reduction with anesthesia after prolonged traction
No anesthesia
The children were treated with closed reduction with no anesthesia after prolonged traction
Interventions
Eligibility Criteria
developmental dislocation of the hip( \< 6 months)
You may qualify if:
- The patients with GrafⅢ/Ⅳtype DDH diagnosed by ultrasound or if they were IHDI (International Hip Dysplasia Institute) grade III or IV on radiographs,and The infants who were \<6 months of age. Patients were followed for at least 18 months,by which time they had either completed treatment with no evidence of requiring further treatment or were treated surgically after failing brace treatment.
You may not qualify if:
- Infants were excluded if they had multiple congenital abnormalities, had prior treatment in other centres, or showed teratological dislocations. The last were defined as fixed dislocation of the hip in association with either a recognised syndrome or a neurological disorder.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Related Publications (4)
Cashman JP, Round J, Taylor G, Clarke NM. The natural history of developmental dysplasia of the hip after early supervised treatment in the Pavlik harness. A prospective, longitudinal follow-up. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2002 Apr;84(3):418-25. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.84b3.12230.
PMID: 12002504BACKGROUNDUpasani VV, Bomar JD, Matheney TH, Sankar WN, Mulpuri K, Price CT, Moseley CF, Kelley SP, Narayanan U, Clarke NM, Wedge JH, Castaneda P, Kasser JR, Foster BK, Herrera-Soto JA, Cundy PJ, Williams N, Mubarak SJ. Evaluation of Brace Treatment for Infant Hip Dislocation in a Prospective Cohort: Defining the Success Rate and Variables Associated with Failure. J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2016 Jul 20;98(14):1215-21. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.15.01018.
PMID: 27440570BACKGROUNDFukiage K, Futami T, Ogi Y, Harada Y, Shimozono F, Kashiwagi N, Takase T, Suzuki S. Ultrasound-guided gradual reduction using flexion and abduction continuous traction for developmental dysplasia of the hip: a new method of treatment. Bone Joint J. 2015 Mar;97-B(3):405-11. doi: 10.1302/0301-620X.97B3.34287.
PMID: 25737526BACKGROUNDYamada N, Maeda S, Fujii G, Kita A, Funayama K, Kokubun S. Closed reduction of developmental dislocation of the hip by prolonged traction. J Bone Joint Surg Br. 2003 Nov;85(8):1173-7. doi: 10.1302/0301-620x.85b8.14208.
PMID: 14653603BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Director,Orthopaedics
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 10, 2017
First Posted
March 30, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2017
Study Completion
March 1, 2017
Last Updated
March 30, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share