Effect of Multisensory Stimulation on Upper Extremity Motor Recovery in Stroke Patient: a Preliminary Testing
1 other identifier
interventional
12
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Despite the advances in stroke rehabilitation, post-stroke upper extremity impairment is still a major challenge. Increasing evidence can be found supporting stimulation of the afferent receptor enhances neuroplasticity in the brain. Studies have suggested multisensory stimulation could promote motor learning by re-establishing the disrupted sensorimotor loop due to stroke and enhance neuroplasticity. The objective of the study was to examine the effect of multisensory stimulation on upper-extremity motor recovery and self-care function in stroke patients.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable stroke
Started Mar 2015
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable stroke
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
March 1, 2015
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2015
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2015
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 13, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 29, 2017
CompletedMarch 29, 2017
March 1, 2017
10 months
March 13, 2017
March 23, 2017
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline Fugl-Meyer Assessment of Motor Recovery at 3 months
The Fugl-Meyer Assessment was used to assess the progress in synergistic and voluntary movement at baseline and post intervention.
Baseline and post intervention at week 12
Change from baseline Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity at 3 months
The Functional Test for the Hemiplegic Upper Extremity was used to evaluate the recovery of the hemiplegic upper extremity functions at baseline and post intervention.
Baseline and post intervention at week 12
Secondary Outcomes (2)
Change from baseline Modified Barthel Index at 3 months
Baseline and post intervention at week 12
Change from baseline Manual Muscle testing at 3 months
Baseline and post intervention at week 12
Study Arms (2)
Multisensory therapy group
EXPERIMENTALThe Multisensory therapy (MT) group received a 12-weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training conducted by an occupational therapist. Each session began with 15 minutes of sensory stimulation (cold and vibration), 45 minutes of motor training and 30 minutes of self-care training.
Conventional training group
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe conventional training (CT) group included 12 weeks (two sessions/ week; 90 minutes/session) training conducted by an occupational therapist. Each session included 60 minutes of upper extremity motor practice (same as in MT group) and 30 minutes of self-care training (same as in MT group).
Interventions
Sensory stimulation, motor training and ADL training
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- First-time ischemic or hemorrhagic stroke;
- Stroke onset \> 4 weeks and \< 6 months
- Single lesion
- Upper extremity motor deficit
- No severe cognitive impairment and able to follow verbal instructions.
You may not qualify if:
- Skin conditions/ injuries over the stimulation application areas
- Contraindication for cold or vibration application
- Speech disorder or global aphasia
- Musculoskeletal or cardiac disorders
- Other neurological conditions
- History of diabetes or sensory impairment attributable to peripheral vascular disease or neuropathy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Tung Wah Collegelead
Study Sites (1)
Wong Tai Sin Hospital
Wong Tai Sin, Hong Kong
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Ray Li, Master
Occupational Therapist
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- NON RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Principal Investigator, Adjunct Lecturer
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 13, 2017
First Posted
March 29, 2017
Study Start
March 1, 2015
Primary Completion
December 31, 2015
Study Completion
December 31, 2015
Last Updated
March 29, 2017
Record last verified: 2017-03
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
Share all the available data as requested