Study Stopped
The primary trial was stopped. Since, a feasibility study showed that recruitment was not feasible. We obtain a recruitment rate of 15 %.
Comparing Satisfaction With a Participatory Driven Web-application and a Standard Website
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
This project studies the effects of involving patients in the development of a web-application.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Jan 2021
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 17, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 23, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
January 25, 2021
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
January 25, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2021
CompletedJanuary 27, 2021
January 1, 2021
Same day
March 17, 2017
January 25, 2021
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
General satisfaction
The question: 'how likely is it that you would recommend this web-application to a friend or colleague?' will be applied to measure satisfaction. The patients will be asked to choose between 11 boxes displayed on a horizontal line (10-0 Points, higher score indicating more satisfaction). The scales will be labelled to the left at 10 (extremely likely) and at the right side as 0 (not at all likely). It is only possible to tick off one box, if the patient change decision while filling in the online questionnaire, another box can be ticked off and the first choice will automatically delete. Responses of 10-9 are grouped as 'satisfied' of the web-application and patients replying 8-0 will be grouped as 'not satisfied'. The proportion of patients being satisfied after 12 weeks is the primary analysis. The proportion of patients being satisfied after 1, 2, 4, and 8 weeks will be carried out as secondary analyses.
12 weeks
Secondary Outcomes (11)
Functional improvement
12 weeks
Pain intensity
1, 2, 4, 8, and 12 weeks
Improvement in self-rated health
12 weeks
Employment status
12 weeks
Sick leave
12 weeks
- +6 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
New web-application
EXPERIMENTALInformation material developed in a participatory design together with patients.
Patient Handbook
EXPERIMENTALPublic available information.
Interventions
Online web-application developed together with patients with low back pain
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Contacting general practice with low back pain
You may not qualify if:
- Spinal stenosis
- Spine fractures
- Cauda equina syndrome
- Spinal malignancy
- Osteoporosis
- Spondyloarthritis
- Without Danish reading skills
- Without internet access
- Pregnant women
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Aalborg University Hospitallead
- The Novo Nordic Foundationcollaborator
- The Danish Rheumatism Associationcollaborator
Related Publications (2)
Riis A, Rathleff MS, Hartvigsen J, Thomsen JL, Afzali T, Jensen MB. Feasibility study on recruitment in general practice for a low back pain online information study (part of the ADVIN Back Trial). BMC Res Notes. 2020 Jan 10;13(1):24. doi: 10.1186/s13104-020-4894-8.
PMID: 31924258DERIVEDRiis A, Hartvigsen J, Rathleff MS, Afzali T, Jensen MB. Comparing satisfaction with a participatory driven web-application and a standard website for patients with low back pain: a study protocol for a randomised controlled trial (part of the ADVIN Back Trial). Trials. 2018 Jul 25;19(1):399. doi: 10.1186/s13063-018-2795-0.
PMID: 30045749DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Allan Riis, PhD
Research unit for General Practice in Aalborg, Denmark
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- TRIPLE
- Who Masked
- CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Masking Details
- The allocation sequence will be delivered by the statistician group at Aalborg University Hospital and delivered to a IT consultant at ProData (Viby, J, Denmark) and integrated in the web-application. The researchers conducting the analysis will be blinded. During the project, data will be stored on a server placed at Aalborg University. Another member of the author Group will prepare a data set with a dummy variable for allocation without free text information from patients and make this data set available for the assessors to analyse. Patients will be aware of their allocation. General practitioners will only be aware of the allocation if the patient chooses to tell it to the general practitioner.
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Post doc
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 17, 2017
First Posted
March 23, 2017
Study Start
January 25, 2021
Primary Completion
January 25, 2021
Study Completion
January 25, 2021
Last Updated
January 27, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share