NCT03087656

Brief Summary

Endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP) is an endoscopic procedure used to treat bile duct stones, obstructive jaundice, biliary leaks, and a variety of other conditions. There is active debate whether antibiotics should be given prophylactically for ERCP outside of high risk indications including primary sclerosing cholangitis. In part this is due to a lack of appropriately powered clinical trials with adequate follow up. The aim will be to assess whether prophylactic antibiotics decrease the rate of post ERCP cholangitis as defined by the Revised Tokyo Criterion.

Trial Health

43
At Risk

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Trial has exceeded expected completion date
Enrollment
200

participants targeted

Target at P75+ for phase_4

Timeline
Completed

Started Mar 2017

Longer than P75 for phase_4

Geographic Reach
1 country

1 active site

Status
unknown

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 5, 2017

Completed
17 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 22, 2017

Completed
7 days until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

March 29, 2017

Completed
6.9 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

February 23, 2024

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

February 23, 2024

Completed
Last Updated

March 6, 2023

Status Verified

March 1, 2023

Enrollment Period

6.9 years

First QC Date

March 5, 2017

Last Update Submit

March 2, 2023

Conditions

Keywords

levofloxacinCeftriaxoneCholangitisERCP

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Proportion of patients who develop Post-ERCP Cholangitis as defined by the revised Tokyo criterion.

    The primary outcome will be the proportion of patients who develop develop post-ERCP cholangitis as defined by the Revised Tokyo criterion within 1 week of ERCP.

    1 week

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Days of hospitalization

    1 week

  • Proportion of patients who develop adverse events of antibiotics

    1 week

Study Arms (2)

Antibiotic arm

ACTIVE COMPARATOR

The drugs ceftriaxone and levofloxacin will be administered to patients in the antibiotic arm.

Drug: CeftriaxoneDrug: Levofloxacin

No Antibiotic arm

NO INTERVENTION

No prophylactic antibiotics will be administered.

Interventions

Intravenous Ceftriaxone will be given during the procedure.

Also known as: Rocephin
Antibiotic arm

Oral Levofloxacin will be given for 3 days after the procedure.

Also known as: Levaquin
Antibiotic arm

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years - 90 Years
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Patients aged 18 to 90 years undergoing therapeutic ERCP for standard, biliary indications including but not limited to:
  • suspected bile duct stones
  • malignant and benign biliary obstruction
  • bile leaks

You may not qualify if:

  • Patients who are incarcerated
  • Patients who are not competent to give informed consent
  • Patients in whom periprocedural antibiotics are mandatory.
  • These include patients with:
  • primary sclerosing cholangitis,
  • multiple biliary strictures,
  • hilar tumors,
  • neutropenia (absolute neutrophil count \<500), or
  • immunosuppressive therapy.
  • Patients who have been diagnosed with cholangitis or are suspected to have another active infection requiring antibiotics (such as an infected fluid collection).
  • Patients who have received antibiotics within 7 days.
  • Patient who have undergone ERCP within 30 days.
  • Patients who undergo multiple ERCP for clinical indication will only be eligible to participate in the study for one procedure.
  • Patients who have had prior biliary surgeries.
  • Patients in whom bile duct decompression is unsuccessful will be excluded as these patients are at increased risk of cholangitis.
  • +7 more criteria

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (1)

Los Angeles County Hospital

Los Angeles, California, 90033, United States

RECRUITING

Related Publications (14)

  • Sauter G, Grabein B, Huber G, Mannes GA, Ruckdeschel G, Sauerbruch T. Antibiotic prophylaxis of infectious complications with endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A randomized controlled study. Endoscopy. 1990 Jul;22(4):164-7. doi: 10.1055/s-2007-1012830.

  • van den Hazel SJ, Speelman P, Dankert J, Huibregtse K, Tytgat GN, van Leeuwen DJ. Piperacillin to prevent cholangitis after endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. A randomized, controlled trial. Ann Intern Med. 1996 Sep 15;125(6):442-7. doi: 10.7326/0003-4819-125-6-199609150-00002.

  • Glomsaker T, Soreide K, Hoff G, Aabakken L, Soreide JA; Norwegian Gastronet ERCP group. Contemporary use of endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography (ERCP): a Norwegian prospective, multicenter study. Scand J Gastroenterol. 2011 Sep;46(9):1144-51. doi: 10.3109/00365521.2011.594085. Epub 2011 Jun 22.

  • Cotton PB, Garrow DA, Gallagher J, Romagnuolo J. Risk factors for complications after ERCP: a multivariate analysis of 11,497 procedures over 12 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2009 Jul;70(1):80-8. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2008.10.039. Epub 2009 Mar 14.

  • Christensen M, Matzen P, Schulze S, Rosenberg J. Complications of ERCP: a prospective study. Gastrointest Endosc. 2004 Nov;60(5):721-31. doi: 10.1016/s0016-5107(04)02169-8.

  • Andriulli A, Loperfido S, Napolitano G, Niro G, Valvano MR, Spirito F, Pilotto A, Forlano R. Incidence rates of post-ERCP complications: a systematic survey of prospective studies. Am J Gastroenterol. 2007 Aug;102(8):1781-8. doi: 10.1111/j.1572-0241.2007.01279.x. Epub 2007 May 17.

  • Bodger K, Bowering K, Sarkar S, Thompson E, Pearson MG. All-cause mortality after first ERCP in England: clinically guided analysis of hospital episode statistics with linkage to registry of death. Gastrointest Endosc. 2011 Oct;74(4):825-33. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2011.06.007. Epub 2011 Aug 11.

  • Bai Y, Gao F, Gao J, Zou DW, Li ZS. Prophylactic antibiotics cannot prevent endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography-induced cholangitis: a meta-analysis. Pancreas. 2009 Mar;38(2):126-30. doi: 10.1097/MPA.0b013e318189fl6d.

  • ASGE Standards of Practice Committee; Khashab MA, Chithadi KV, Acosta RD, Bruining DH, Chandrasekhara V, Eloubeidi MA, Fanelli RD, Faulx AL, Fonkalsrud L, Lightdale JR, Muthusamy VR, Pasha SF, Saltzman JR, Shaukat A, Wang A, Cash BD. Antibiotic prophylaxis for GI endoscopy. Gastrointest Endosc. 2015 Jan;81(1):81-9. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2014.08.008. Epub 2014 Nov 11. No abstract available.

  • Cotton PB, Connor P, Rawls E, Romagnuolo J. Infection after ERCP, and antibiotic prophylaxis: a sequential quality-improvement approach over 11 years. Gastrointest Endosc. 2008 Mar;67(3):471-5. doi: 10.1016/j.gie.2007.06.065. Epub 2007 Dec 3.

  • Brand M, Bizos D, O'Farrell P Jr. Antibiotic prophylaxis for patients undergoing elective endoscopic retrograde cholangiopancreatography. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2010 Oct 6;2010(10):CD007345. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD007345.pub2.

  • Kiriyama S, Takada T, Strasberg SM, Solomkin JS, Mayumi T, Pitt HA, Gouma DJ, Garden OJ, Buchler MW, Yokoe M, Kimura Y, Tsuyuguchi T, Itoi T, Yoshida M, Miura F, Yamashita Y, Okamoto K, Gabata T, Hata J, Higuchi R, Windsor JA, Bornman PC, Fan ST, Singh H, de Santibanes E, Gomi H, Kusachi S, Murata A, Chen XP, Jagannath P, Lee S, Padbury R, Chen MF, Dervenis C, Chan AC, Supe AN, Liau KH, Kim MH, Kim SW; Tokyo Guidelines Revision Committee. TG13 guidelines for diagnosis and severity grading of acute cholangitis (with videos). J Hepatobiliary Pancreat Sci. 2013 Jan;20(1):24-34. doi: 10.1007/s00534-012-0561-3.

  • Carignan A, Allard C, Pepin J, Cossette B, Nault V, Valiquette L. Risk of Clostridium difficile infection after perioperative antibacterial prophylaxis before and during an outbreak of infection due to a hypervirulent strain. Clin Infect Dis. 2008 Jun 15;46(12):1838-43. doi: 10.1086/588291.

  • Johannes CB, Ziyadeh N, Seeger JD, Tucker E, Reiter C, Faich G. Incidence of allergic reactions associated with antibacterial use in a large, managed care organisation. Drug Saf. 2007;30(8):705-13. doi: 10.2165/00002018-200730080-00007.

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Cholangitis

Interventions

CeftriaxoneLevofloxacin

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Bile Duct DiseasesBiliary Tract DiseasesDigestive System Diseases

Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)

CefotaximeCephacetrileCephalosporinsbeta-LactamsLactamsAmidesOrganic ChemicalsThiazinesSulfur CompoundsHeterocyclic Compounds, 2-RingHeterocyclic Compounds, Fused-RingHeterocyclic CompoundsOfloxacinFluoroquinolones4-QuinolonesQuinolonesQuinolines

Study Officials

  • James Buxbaum

    University of Southern California Health Science Center

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR

Central Study Contacts

James Buxbaum

CONTACT

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
phase 4
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
DOUBLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, INVESTIGATOR
Masking Details
subjects to be randomized into two arms: antibiotic arm and no antibiotic arm
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
PI Title
Chief Endoscopist/Associate Professor of Clinical Medicine

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 5, 2017

First Posted

March 22, 2017

Study Start

March 29, 2017

Primary Completion

February 23, 2024

Study Completion

February 23, 2024

Last Updated

March 6, 2023

Record last verified: 2023-03

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will share

Locations