CTEPH Identification an Standard Computerised Tomography Pulmonary Angiography in Pulmonary Embolism Patients
InShapeIII
Identification of CTEPH on Standard Computerised Tomography Pulmonary Angiography Performed in the Work-up of Suspected Pulmonary Embolism
1 other identifier
observational
100
1 country
1
Brief Summary
In this study the investigators will evaluate whether more careful reading (than the current standard) of routine computerised tomography pulmonary angiography (CTPA) performed in the clinical work-up of suspected (pulmonary embolism (PE) will differentiate patients with acute PE from those with more chronic or acute on chronic PE, which could be indicative of the presence of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH)"
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for all trials
Started May 2017
Shorter than P25 for all trials
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 17, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
May 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
March 1, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
March 1, 2018
CompletedResults Posted
Study results publicly available
February 25, 2021
CompletedApril 19, 2021
March 1, 2021
10 months
March 8, 2017
February 6, 2021
March 18, 2021
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
To Identify the Accuracy of Routine CTPA for the Distinction of CTEPH From Acute PE.
The sensitivity of CTPA is determined by calculating the proportion of scans that are read as "positive for the CTEPH specific radiological pattern" in patients with confirmed CTEPH and the specificity is determined by calculating the proportion of scans that are read as "negative for the CTEPH specific radiological pattern" in patients without CTEPH.
1 year
Study Arms (2)
CTEPH patients
the initial CTPA scan will be reviewed in patients diagnosed with CTEPH after an episode of an acute PE
non CTEPH patients
the initial CTPA scan will be reviewed in patients after an episode of an acute PE in whom CTEPH was excluded
Interventions
The initial CTPA will be reviewed
Eligibility Criteria
The CTPA scans of the following patient populations will be compared. The first group consists of patients with confirmed CTEPH after a prior diagnosis of acute PE. The control group consists of patients with an episode of acute PE in whom CTEPH was excluded after 2 years of follow-up by echocardiography. The CTPA scans of case and control patients will be matched according to the right-to-left ventricule diameter ratio.
You may qualify if:
- patients after an acute PE diagnosed with CTEPH according to current guidelines, patients after an acute PE in whom CTEPH is excluded by follow-up echocardiography
- availability of the CTPA scan of the initial PE episode
You may not qualify if:
- CTEPH diagnosis based on other test results than a RHC
- Patients who did not receive anticoagulation after PE diagnosis
- Patients under the age of 18 years old
- Patients in the control group with a follow-up duration of less than 2 years after the index PE episode
- Use of a CTPA scanner with less than 32-detector rows
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
LUMC
Leiden, 2333 ZA, Netherlands
Related Publications (11)
Konstantinides SV. 2014 ESC Guidelines on the diagnosis and management of acute pulmonary embolism. Eur Heart J. 2014 Dec 1;35(45):3145-6. doi: 10.1093/eurheartj/ehu393. No abstract available.
PMID: 25452462BACKGROUNDGalie N, Humbert M, Vachiery JL, Gibbs S, Lang I, Torbicki A, Simonneau G, Peacock A, Vonk Noordegraaf A, Beghetti M, Ghofrani A, Gomez Sanchez MA, Hansmann G, Klepetko W, Lancellotti P, Matucci M, McDonagh T, Pierard LA, Trindade PT, Zompatori M, Hoeper M. 2015 ESC/ERS Guidelines for the diagnosis and treatment of pulmonary hypertension: The Joint Task Force for the Diagnosis and Treatment of Pulmonary Hypertension of the European Society of Cardiology (ESC) and the European Respiratory Society (ERS): Endorsed by: Association for European Paediatric and Congenital Cardiology (AEPC), International Society for Heart and Lung Transplantation (ISHLT). Eur Respir J. 2015 Oct;46(4):903-75. doi: 10.1183/13993003.01032-2015. Epub 2015 Aug 29.
PMID: 26318161BACKGROUNDPepke-Zaba J, Delcroix M, Lang I, Mayer E, Jansa P, Ambroz D, Treacy C, D'Armini AM, Morsolini M, Snijder R, Bresser P, Torbicki A, Kristensen B, Lewczuk J, Simkova I, Barbera JA, de Perrot M, Hoeper MM, Gaine S, Speich R, Gomez-Sanchez MA, Kovacs G, Hamid AM, Jais X, Simonneau G. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension (CTEPH): results from an international prospective registry. Circulation. 2011 Nov 1;124(18):1973-81. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.110.015008. Epub 2011 Oct 3.
PMID: 21969018BACKGROUNDTunariu N, Gibbs SJ, Win Z, Gin-Sing W, Graham A, Gishen P, Al-Nahhas A. Ventilation-perfusion scintigraphy is more sensitive than multidetector CTPA in detecting chronic thromboembolic pulmonary disease as a treatable cause of pulmonary hypertension. J Nucl Med. 2007 May;48(5):680-4. doi: 10.2967/jnumed.106.039438.
PMID: 17475953BACKGROUNDDogan H, de Roos A, Geleijins J, Huisman MV, Kroft LJ. The role of computed tomography in the diagnosis of acute and chronic pulmonary embolism. Diagn Interv Radiol. 2015 Jul-Aug;21(4):307-16. doi: 10.5152/dir.2015.14403.
PMID: 26133321BACKGROUNDKim NH, Delcroix M, Jenkins DP, Channick R, Dartevelle P, Jansa P, Lang I, Madani MM, Ogino H, Pengo V, Mayer E. Chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. J Am Coll Cardiol. 2013 Dec 24;62(25 Suppl):D92-9. doi: 10.1016/j.jacc.2013.10.024.
PMID: 24355646BACKGROUNDLang IM, Pesavento R, Bonderman D, Yuan JX. Risk factors and basic mechanisms of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension: a current understanding. Eur Respir J. 2013 Feb;41(2):462-8. doi: 10.1183/09031936.00049312. Epub 2012 Jun 14.
PMID: 22700839BACKGROUNDLang IM, Madani M. Update on chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. Circulation. 2014 Aug 5;130(6):508-18. doi: 10.1161/CIRCULATIONAHA.114.009309. No abstract available.
PMID: 25092279BACKGROUNDLang IM, Simonneau G, Pepke-Zaba JW, Mayer E, Ambroz D, Blanco I, Torbicki A, Mellemkjaer S, Yaici A, Delcroix M. Factors associated with diagnosis and operability of chronic thromboembolic pulmonary hypertension. A case-control study. Thromb Haemost. 2013 Jul;110(1):83-91. doi: 10.1160/TH13-02-0097. Epub 2013 May 16.
PMID: 23677493BACKGROUNDvan der Bijl N, Klok FA, Huisman MV, van Rooden JK, Mertens BJA, de Roos A, Kroft LJM. Measurement of right and left ventricular function by ECG-synchronized CT scanning in patients with acute pulmonary embolism: usefulness for predicting short-term outcome. Chest. 2011 Oct;140(4):1008-1015. doi: 10.1378/chest.10-3174. Epub 2011 Apr 7.
PMID: 21474573BACKGROUNDKlok FA, Zondag W, van Kralingen KW, van Dijk AP, Tamsma JT, Heyning FH, Vliegen HW, Huisman MV. Patient outcomes after acute pulmonary embolism. A pooled survival analysis of different adverse events. Am J Respir Crit Care Med. 2010 Mar 1;181(5):501-6. doi: 10.1164/rccm.200907-1141OC. Epub 2009 Dec 3.
PMID: 19965808BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Limitations and Caveats
We studied clear-cut cases of patients with CTEPH and PE patients with RV overload who did not develop CTEPH after 2 years of follow-up, whereas, in clinical practice, the presentation of CTEPH is heterogeneous and the diagnosis is often challenging, for instance, when considering other conditions that may cause PH. Moreover, the prevalence of CTEPH in the cohort was 50%, yet this number is much lower in clinical practice.
Results Point of Contact
- Title
- F.A. Klok, MD PhD
- Organization
- LUMC
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
F.A. Klok, MD PhD
LUMC department of thormbosis and hemostasis
Publication Agreements
- PI is Sponsor Employee
- No
- Restrictive Agreement
- No
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- CASE CONTROL
- Time Perspective
- OTHER
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- principal investigator
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 8, 2017
First Posted
March 17, 2017
Study Start
May 1, 2017
Primary Completion
March 1, 2018
Study Completion
March 1, 2018
Last Updated
April 19, 2021
Results First Posted
February 25, 2021
Record last verified: 2021-03