Appendectomy Versus Conservative Treatment for Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis
ACTUAA
A Prospective Non-randomized Controlled, Multicenter, Multidisciplinary Trial Comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients With Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA STUDY).
1 other identifier
observational
300
1 country
7
Brief Summary
On September the 15th, 2015, Italian surgeons, radiologists and pathologists with a special interest and expertise in the diagnosis and management of Acute Appendicitis (AA), met up under the auspices of the Italian Society of Hospital Surgeons (ACOI) in Oristano (Italy) to constitute the ACTUAA collaborative working group. The main objectives of the working group are: To create a working basis for analyzing the diagnostic features, treatment modalities and outcomes of interest of both the antibiotic-first approach and appendectomy for patients with uncomplicated AA. To investigate the clinical, laboratory and radiologic modalities adopted for the diagnosis To determine the outcomes of patients treated with antibiotics or appendectomy in the short and long term periods. To compare results according to the type of intervention. To stratify the risk of recurrence for patients treated with antibiotics according to clinical, laboratory and radiology findings. To evaluate the sensibility and specificity of clinical and laboratory scores for the diagnosis of uncomplicated AA. To identify a subgroup of patients with uncomplicated AA for whom antibiotic treatment can be highly effective. General study design The study protocol is designed according to the "SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials". The study period is estimated to be of 12 month + 12 month of follow-up (with a second session of follow-up following 5-years), beginning on 01/04/2017. Participants All adult patients (aged over 18 years old) with suspected AA will be admitted to the Surgical Department of the nine participating Italian hospitals, where they will be studied carefully by the on call surgeon. Patients will be then informed of the study protocol and invited to give written consent for participation and for sensible data collection for scientific purposes. Subsequently, only patients who will undergo diagnostic imaging (as specified later) and from whom a written informed consent will be obtained, can be enrolled in the study and registered by each Center using a uniform electronic registration form and database. General characteristics, medical history, clinical findings, physical investigation, and blood tests will be reported in the medical record. Pain will be quantified by Visual Analogue Scale (VAS) scoring system before administrating any pain medications and after the treatments. In order to enter the study, patients will have to undergo diagnostic imaging (US and/or CT scan or MRI scan) and only the diagnosis of uncomplicated AA confirmed by diagnostic imaging will permit patient enrollment in the study. Specific aims of the ACTUAA Study The objective of this prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter, multidisciplinary trial is to compare the antibiotic therapy and emergency appendectomy for the treatment of patients with uncomplicated AA(without abscess or free perforation), confirmed by US and/or CT or MRI scan. No changes in the daily practice regarding the diagnostic, clinical and treatment pathways will be required to the participating centers. However, only the patients with uncomplicated AA, confirmed by one of the above mentioned radiologic tools will be enrolled in the study. The decision on which of the tools are to be adopted will be up to the local lead surgeon. Primary Outcome Measure: Number of participants with complication-free treatment success, defined as success of the initial treatment with uncomplicated course. Secondary Outcome Measures: Length of hospital stay; Pain evaluation; Time to return to normal activity; Period of sick-leave; Complicated appendicitis with peritonitis identified at the time of surgical operation; Quality of life as assessed by the Short Form 12-scale (SF-12)
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for all trials
Started Jun 2017
Typical duration for all trials
7 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 5, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 15, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 1, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
June 30, 2018
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2019
CompletedJanuary 7, 2020
January 1, 2020
1.1 years
March 5, 2017
January 6, 2020
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Number of participants with complication-free treatment success, as assessed by the Dindo-Clavien Scale.
Number of participants with complication-free treatment success, defined as success of the initial treatment with uncomplicated course: no postoperative complications, adverse events, or treatment failure occurring, as assessed by the Dindo-Clavien Classification. Post-treatment abdominal abscess, bowel occlusion, incisional hernia, pulmonary embolism, cardio-vascular complications, surgical site infection, complications due to anesthesia, adverse reactions to antibiotics. Complications are analyzed both for patients submitted to appendectomy and for those treated with surgery as second line approach, after primary antibiotic treatment failure. For patients treated with antibiotics, treatment failure (persistency and recurrence rates of acute appendicitis) will be evaluated within the overall-complications rate. Specific sub-analyses of the complications will be carried out.
1 year
Secondary Outcomes (6)
Length of hospital stay
1 week
VAS-Score
1 month
Time to return to normal activity
1 month
Period of sick-leave
1 month
Complicated appendicitis with peritonitis identified at the time of surgical operation.
1 year
- +1 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Patients submitted to appendectomy as first-line treatment
Open or Laparoscopic Appendectomy The assignment of each patient to either the "antibiotic-first management" arm or the "immediate surgery" arm, will be non-randomized and decided independently by the Staff Specialist Surgeon on Call, upon careful assessment of AIR score, laboratory findings and imaging. The decision of the management pathway will not be influenced in any case by the participation of the patient in the study, and the assignment of the treatment will be decided by the consultant surgeon according to current good surgical practice and standard practice patterns in Italy.
Patients treated with antibiotic-first strategy
Antibiotic therapy.maging. Patients managed conservatively will receive one of the following parenteral antibiotic treatments: Piperacillin/Tazobactam (4.5 g) three intravenous administration per day; Ceftriaxone (2 g) once per day or Ciprofloxacin (500 mg) twice per day plus Metronidazole (500 mg) three times per day; Amoxicillin/Clavulanic acid (2 g) four times per day for a length depending on the clinical conditions; Ertapenem (1 g) one administration per day for three days. Patients were discharged with oral antibiotics (amoxicillin/clavulanic acid or ciprofloxacin) for at least four days.
Interventions
Laparoscopic three-port or single-port appendectomy; or conventional McBurney laparotomic appendectomy; or open appendectomy performed through midline incision
Patients treated with antibiotics as first-line approach
Eligibility Criteria
All adult patients (aged over 18 years old) with suspected Acute Appendicitis admitted to the Surgical Department of the nine participating Italian Hospitals
You may qualify if:
- Signed informed consent
- Age over 18 years
- Uncomplicated AA confirmed by US and/or CT or MRI scan.
You may not qualify if:
- Pregnancy or lactating
- Diffuse peritonitis at physical examination
- Serious systemic illness
- Positive anamnesis for Inflammatory Bowel Disease (IBD)
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Mauro Poddalead
- Associazione Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italianicollaborator
Study Sites (7)
General and Emergency Surgery Unit, San Marcellino Hospital
Muravera, Cagliari, 09043, Italy
Department of General Surgery, San Giovanni Addolorata Hospital
Rome, Italt, Italy
General Surgery Unit, Nostra Signora Della Mercede Hospita, Lanusei
Lanusei, Ogliastra, 08045, Italy
General and Endocrine Surgical Unit, Cagliari University Hospital, Cagliari
Cagliari, 09042, Italy
General Surgery, Santissima TrinitĂ Hospital
Cagliari, 09121, Italy
Emergency Surgery Unit, Villa Betania Evangelic Hospital, Napoli
Napoli, 80147, Italy
General, Minimally Invasive and Robotic Surgery, San Francesco Hospital
Nuoro, 08100, Italy
Related Publications (45)
DeFrances CJ, Hall MJ. 2002 National Hospital Discharge Survey. Adv Data. 2004 May 21;(342):1-29.
PMID: 15174387BACKGROUNDLivingston EH, Woodward WA, Sarosi GA, Haley RW. Disconnect between incidence of nonperforated and perforated appendicitis: implications for pathophysiology and management. Ann Surg. 2007 Jun;245(6):886-92. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000256391.05233.aa.
PMID: 17522514BACKGROUNDAddiss DG, Shaffer N, Fowler BS, Tauxe RV. The epidemiology of appendicitis and appendectomy in the United States. Am J Epidemiol. 1990 Nov;132(5):910-25. doi: 10.1093/oxfordjournals.aje.a115734.
PMID: 2239906BACKGROUNDDi Saverio S, Birindelli A, Kelly MD, Catena F, Weber DG, Sartelli M, Sugrue M, De Moya M, Gomes CA, Bhangu A, Agresta F, Moore EE, Soreide K, Griffiths E, De Castro S, Kashuk J, Kluger Y, Leppaniemi A, Ansaloni L, Andersson M, Coccolini F, Coimbra R, Gurusamy KS, Campanile FC, Biffl W, Chiara O, Moore F, Peitzman AB, Fraga GP, Costa D, Maier RV, Rizoli S, Balogh ZJ, Bendinelli C, Cirocchi R, Tonini V, Piccinini A, Tugnoli G, Jovine E, Persiani R, Biondi A, Scalea T, Stahel P, Ivatury R, Velmahos G, Andersson R. WSES Jerusalem guidelines for diagnosis and treatment of acute appendicitis. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 18;11:34. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0090-5. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27437029BACKGROUNDAgresta F, Campanile FC, Podda M, Cillara N, Pernazza G, Giaccaglia V, Ciccoritti L, Ioia G, Mandala S, La Barbera C, Birindelli A, Sartelli M, Di Saverio S; Joined Italian Surgical Societies Working Group. Current status of laparoscopy for acute abdomen in Italy: a critical appraisal of 2012 clinical guidelines from two consecutive nationwide surveys with analysis of 271,323 cases over 5 years. Surg Endosc. 2017 Apr;31(4):1785-1795. doi: 10.1007/s00464-016-5175-4. Epub 2016 Aug 29.
PMID: 27572068BACKGROUNDSartelli M, Catena F, Ansaloni L, Coccolini F, Griffiths EA, Abu-Zidan FM, Di Saverio S, Ulrych J, Kluger Y, Ben-Ishay O, Moore FA, Ivatury RR, Coimbra R, Peitzman AB, Leppaniemi A, Fraga GP, Maier RV, Chiara O, Kashuk J, Sakakushev B, Weber DG, Latifi R, Biffl W, Bala M, Karamarkovic A, Inaba K, Ordonez CA, Hecker A, Augustin G, Demetrashvili Z, Melo RB, Marwah S, Zachariah SK, Shelat VG, McFarlane M, Rems M, Gomes CA, Faro MP, Junior GA, Negoi I, Cui Y, Sato N, Vereczkei A, Bellanova G, Birindelli A, Di Carlo I, Kok KY, Gachabayov M, Gkiokas G, Bouliaris K, Colak E, Isik A, Rios-Cruz D, Soto R, Moore EE. WSES Guidelines for the management of acute left sided colonic diverticulitis in the emergency setting. World J Emerg Surg. 2016 Jul 29;11:37. doi: 10.1186/s13017-016-0095-0. eCollection 2016.
PMID: 27478494BACKGROUNDKatkhouda N, Mason RJ, Towfigh S, Gevorgyan A, Essani R. Laparoscopic versus open appendectomy: a prospective randomized double-blind study. Ann Surg. 2005 Sep;242(3):439-48; discussion 448-50. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000179648.75373.2f.
PMID: 16135930BACKGROUNDDi Saverio S, Sartelli M, Catena F, Birindelli A, Tugnoli G. Renewed Interest in Acute Appendicitis: Are Antibiotics Non-Inferior to Surgery or Possibly Clinically Superior? What Is Long-Term Follow-Up and Natural Evolution of Appendicitis Treated Conservatively with "Antibiotics First"? Surg Infect (Larchmt). 2016 Jun;17(3):376-7. doi: 10.1089/sur.2015.206. Epub 2016 Feb 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 26918798BACKGROUNDLiu K, Fogg L. Use of antibiotics alone for treatment of uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a systematic review and meta-analysis. Surgery. 2011 Oct;150(4):673-83. doi: 10.1016/j.surg.2011.08.018.
PMID: 22000179BACKGROUNDNakhamiyayev V, Galldin L, Chiarello M, Lumba A, Gorecki PJ. Laparoscopic appendectomy is the preferred approach for appendicitis: a retrospective review of two practice patterns. Surg Endosc. 2010 Apr;24(4):859-64. doi: 10.1007/s00464-009-0678-x.
PMID: 19730948BACKGROUNDFlum DR, Koepsell T. The clinical and economic correlates of misdiagnosed appendicitis: nationwide analysis. Arch Surg. 2002 Jul;137(7):799-804; discussion 804. doi: 10.1001/archsurg.137.7.799.
PMID: 12093335BACKGROUNDStyrud J, Eriksson S, Nilsson I, Ahlberg G, Haapaniemi S, Neovius G, Rex L, Badume I, Granstrom L. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment in acute appendicitis. a prospective multicenter randomized controlled trial. World J Surg. 2006 Jun;30(6):1033-7. doi: 10.1007/s00268-005-0304-6.
PMID: 16736333BACKGROUNDTurhan AN, Kapan S, Kutukcu E, Yigitbas H, Hatipoglu S, Aygun E. Comparison of operative and non operative management of acute appendicitis. Ulus Travma Acil Cerrahi Derg. 2009 Sep;15(5):459-62.
PMID: 19779986BACKGROUNDVons C, Barry C, Maitre S, Pautrat K, Leconte M, Costaglioli B, Karoui M, Alves A, Dousset B, Valleur P, Falissard B, Franco D. Amoxicillin plus clavulanic acid versus appendicectomy for treatment of acute uncomplicated appendicitis: an open-label, non-inferiority, randomised controlled trial. Lancet. 2011 May 7;377(9777):1573-9. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(11)60410-8.
PMID: 21550483BACKGROUNDPodda M, Cillara N, Di Saverio S, Lai A, Feroci F, Luridiana G, Agresta F, Vettoretto N; ACOI (Italian Society of Hospital Surgeons) Study Group on Acute Appendicitis. Antibiotics-first strategy for uncomplicated acute appendicitis in adults is associated with increased rates of peritonitis at surgery. A systematic review with meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials comparing appendectomy and non-operative management with antibiotics. Surgeon. 2017 Oct;15(5):303-314. doi: 10.1016/j.surge.2017.02.001. Epub 2017 Mar 9.
PMID: 28284517BACKGROUNDWilms IM, de Hoog DE, de Visser DC, Janzing HM. Appendectomy versus antibiotic treatment for acute appendicitis. Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2011 Nov 9;(11):CD008359. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD008359.pub2.
PMID: 22071846BACKGROUNDFindlay JM, Kafsi JE, Hammer C, Gilmour J, Gillies RS, Maynard ND. Nonoperative Management of Appendicitis in Adults: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis of Randomized Controlled Trials. J Am Coll Surg. 2016 Dec;223(6):814-824.e2. doi: 10.1016/j.jamcollsurg.2016.09.005. Epub 2016 Oct 26. No abstract available.
PMID: 27793458BACKGROUNDSalminen P, Paajanen H, Rautio T, Nordstrom P, Aarnio M, Rantanen T, Tuominen R, Hurme S, Virtanen J, Mecklin JP, Sand J, Jartti A, Rinta-Kiikka I, Gronroos JM. Antibiotic Therapy vs Appendectomy for Treatment of Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis: The APPAC Randomized Clinical Trial. JAMA. 2015 Jun 16;313(23):2340-8. doi: 10.1001/jama.2015.6154.
PMID: 26080338BACKGROUNDChan AW, Tetzlaff JM, Gotzsche PC, Altman DG, Mann H, Berlin JA, Dickersin K, Hrobjartsson A, Schulz KF, Parulekar WR, Krleza-Jeric K, Laupacis A, Moher D. SPIRIT 2013 explanation and elaboration: guidance for protocols of clinical trials. BMJ. 2013 Jan 8;346:e7586. doi: 10.1136/bmj.e7586.
PMID: 23303884BACKGROUNDHarnoss JC, Zelienka I, Probst P, Grummich K, Muller-Lantzsch C, Harnoss JM, Ulrich A, Buchler MW, Diener MK. Antibiotics Versus Surgical Therapy for Uncomplicated Appendicitis: Systematic Review and Meta-analysis of Controlled Trials (PROSPERO 2015: CRD42015016882). Ann Surg. 2017 May;265(5):889-900. doi: 10.1097/SLA.0000000000002039.
PMID: 27759621BACKGROUNDAndersson M, Andersson RE. The appendicitis inflammatory response score: a tool for the diagnosis of acute appendicitis that outperforms the Alvarado score. World J Surg. 2008 Aug;32(8):1843-9. doi: 10.1007/s00268-008-9649-y.
PMID: 18553045BACKGROUNDDindo D, Demartines N, Clavien PA. Classification of surgical complications: a new proposal with evaluation in a cohort of 6336 patients and results of a survey. Ann Surg. 2004 Aug;240(2):205-13. doi: 10.1097/01.sla.0000133083.54934.ae.
PMID: 15273542BACKGROUNDEriksson S, Granstrom L. Randomized controlled trial of appendicectomy versus antibiotic therapy for acute appendicitis. Br J Surg. 1995 Feb;82(2):166-9. doi: 10.1002/bjs.1800820207.
PMID: 7749676BACKGROUNDHansson J, Korner U, Khorram-Manesh A, Solberg A, Lundholm K. Randomized clinical trial of antibiotic therapy versus appendicectomy as primary treatment of acute appendicitis in unselected patients. Br J Surg. 2009 May;96(5):473-81. doi: 10.1002/bjs.6482.
PMID: 19358184BACKGROUNDGregory S, Kuntz K, Sainfort F, Kharbanda A. Cost-Effectiveness of Integrating a Clinical Decision Rule and Staged Imaging Protocol for Diagnosis of Appendicitis. Value Health. 2016 Jan;19(1):28-35. doi: 10.1016/j.jval.2015.10.007. Epub 2015 Dec 2.
PMID: 26797233BACKGROUNDSammalkorpi HE, Mentula P, Leppaniemi A. A new adult appendicitis score improves diagnostic accuracy of acute appendicitis--a prospective study. BMC Gastroenterol. 2014 Jun 26;14:114. doi: 10.1186/1471-230X-14-114.
PMID: 24970111BACKGROUNDRao PM, Rhea JT, Novelline RA, Mostafavi AA, McCabe CJ. Effect of computed tomography of the appendix on treatment of patients and use of hospital resources. N Engl J Med. 1998 Jan 15;338(3):141-6. doi: 10.1056/NEJM199801153380301.
PMID: 9428814BACKGROUNDvan Randen A, Lameris W, van Es HW, van Heesewijk HP, van Ramshorst B, Ten Hove W, Bouma WH, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Bossuyt PM, Stoker J, Boermeester MA; OPTIMA Study Group. A comparison of the accuracy of ultrasound and computed tomography in common diagnoses causing acute abdominal pain. Eur Radiol. 2011 Jul;21(7):1535-45. doi: 10.1007/s00330-011-2087-5. Epub 2011 Mar 2.
PMID: 21365197BACKGROUNDHumes DJ, Simpson J. Acute appendicitis. BMJ. 2006 Sep 9;333(7567):530-4. doi: 10.1136/bmj.38940.664363.AE. No abstract available.
PMID: 16960208BACKGROUNDJones RP, Jeffrey RB, Shah BR, Desser TS, Rosenberg J, Olcott EW. Journal Club: the Alvarado score as a method for reducing the number of CT studies when appendiceal ultrasound fails to visualize the appendix in adults. AJR Am J Roentgenol. 2015 Mar;204(3):519-26. doi: 10.2214/AJR.14.12864.
PMID: 25714280BACKGROUNDLameris W, van Randen A, van Es HW, van Heesewijk JP, van Ramshorst B, Bouma WH, ten Hove W, van Leeuwen MS, van Keulen EM, Dijkgraaf MG, Bossuyt PM, Boermeester MA, Stoker J; OPTIMA study group. Imaging strategies for detection of urgent conditions in patients with acute abdominal pain: diagnostic accuracy study. BMJ. 2009 Jun 26;338:b2431. doi: 10.1136/bmj.b2431.
PMID: 19561056BACKGROUNDKrishnamoorthi R, Ramarajan N, Wang NE, Newman B, Rubesova E, Mueller CM, Barth RA. Effectiveness of a staged US and CT protocol for the diagnosis of pediatric appendicitis: reducing radiation exposure in the age of ALARA. Radiology. 2011 Apr;259(1):231-9. doi: 10.1148/radiol.10100984. Epub 2011 Jan 28.
PMID: 21324843BACKGROUNDNielsen JW, Boomer L, Kurtovic K, Lee E, Kupzyk K, Mallory R, Adler B, Bates DG, Kenney B. Reducing computed tomography scans for appendicitis by introduction of a standardized and validated ultrasonography report template. J Pediatr Surg. 2015 Jan;50(1):144-8. doi: 10.1016/j.jpedsurg.2014.10.033. Epub 2014 Dec 18.
PMID: 25598112BACKGROUNDAspelund G, Fingeret A, Gross E, Kessler D, Keung C, Thirumoorthi A, Oh PS, Behr G, Chen S, Lampl B, Middlesworth W, Kandel J, Ruzal-Shapiro C. Ultrasonography/MRI versus CT for diagnosing appendicitis. Pediatrics. 2014 Apr;133(4):586-93. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-2128. Epub 2014 Mar 3.
PMID: 24590746BACKGROUNDRettenbacher T, Hollerweger A, Macheiner P, Rettenbacher L, Frass R, Schneider B, Gritzmann N. Presence or absence of gas in the appendix: additional criteria to rule out or confirm acute appendicitis--evaluation with US. Radiology. 2000 Jan;214(1):183-7. doi: 10.1148/radiology.214.1.r00ja20183.
PMID: 10644120BACKGROUNDMostbeck G, Adam EJ, Nielsen MB, Claudon M, Clevert D, Nicolau C, Nyhsen C, Owens CM. How to diagnose acute appendicitis: ultrasound first. Insights Imaging. 2016 Apr;7(2):255-63. doi: 10.1007/s13244-016-0469-6. Epub 2016 Feb 16.
PMID: 26883138BACKGROUNDQuigley AJ, Stafrace S. Ultrasound assessment of acute appendicitis in paediatric patients: methodology and pictorial overview of findings seen. Insights Imaging. 2013 Dec;4(6):741-51. doi: 10.1007/s13244-013-0275-3. Epub 2013 Aug 31.
PMID: 23996381BACKGROUNDBirnbaum BA, Wilson SR. Appendicitis at the millennium. Radiology. 2000 May;215(2):337-48. doi: 10.1148/radiology.215.2.r00ma24337.
PMID: 10796905BACKGROUNDIncesu L, Yazicioglu AK, Selcuk MB, Ozen N. Contrast-enhanced power Doppler US in the diagnosis of acute appendicitis. Eur J Radiol. 2004 May;50(2):201-9. doi: 10.1016/S0720-048X(03)00102-5.
PMID: 15081132BACKGROUNDShogilev DJ, Duus N, Odom SR, Shapiro NI. Diagnosing appendicitis: evidence-based review of the diagnostic approach in 2014. West J Emerg Med. 2014 Nov;15(7):859-71. doi: 10.5811/westjem.2014.9.21568. Epub 2014 Oct 7.
PMID: 25493136BACKGROUNDKarul M, Berliner C, Keller S, Tsui TY, Yamamura J. Imaging of appendicitis in adults. Rofo. 2014 Jun;186(6):551-8. doi: 10.1055/s-0034-1366074. Epub 2014 Apr 23.
PMID: 24760428BACKGROUNDBixby SD, Lucey BC, Soto JA, Theysohn JM, Ozonoff A, Varghese JC. Perforated versus nonperforated acute appendicitis: accuracy of multidetector CT detection. Radiology. 2006 Dec;241(3):780-6. doi: 10.1148/radiol.2413051896.
PMID: 17114626BACKGROUNDRamdass MJ, Young Sing Q, Milne D, Mooteeram J, Barrow S. Association between the appendix and the fecalith in adults. Can J Surg. 2015 Feb;58(1):10-4. doi: 10.1503/cjs.002014.
PMID: 25427333BACKGROUNDPodda M, Poillucci G, Pacella D, Mortola L, Canfora A, Aresu S, Pisano M, Erdas E, Pisanu A, Cillara N; ACTUAA Study Collaborative Working Group. Appendectomy versus conservative treatment with antibiotics for patients with uncomplicated acute appendicitis: a propensity score-matched analysis of patient-centered outcomes (the ACTUAA prospective multicenter trial). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2021 Mar;36(3):589-598. doi: 10.1007/s00384-021-03843-8. Epub 2021 Jan 17.
PMID: 33454817DERIVEDPodda M, Serventi F, Mortola L, Marini S, Sirigu D, Piga M, Pisano M, Coppola M, Agresta F, Virdis F, Di Saverio S, Cillara N; ACTUAA Study Collaborative Working Group. A prospective non-randomized controlled, multicenter trial comparing Appendectomy and Conservative Treatment for Patients with Uncomplicated Acute Appendicitis (the ACTUAA study). Int J Colorectal Dis. 2017 Nov;32(11):1649-1660. doi: 10.1007/s00384-017-2878-5. Epub 2017 Aug 15.
PMID: 28812175DERIVED
Biospecimen
Specimens of the appendix
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Mauro Podda, M.D.
Associazione dei Chirurghi Ospedalieri Italiani ACOI; General Surgeon, San Francesco Hospital. Nuoro (Italy)
Study Design
- Study Type
- observational
- Observational Model
- COHORT
- Time Perspective
- PROSPECTIVE
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Dr. Mauro Podda, M.D.
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 5, 2017
First Posted
March 15, 2017
Study Start
June 1, 2017
Primary Completion
June 30, 2018
Study Completion
December 31, 2019
Last Updated
January 7, 2020
Record last verified: 2020-01
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share
Data will be published as a pool from all participating surgical units. Subgroup analysis by grade of the disease based on the AIR score, surgical technique, histological grade of the appendicitis, type of antibiotic used or outcome variables may be presented, but, in order to avoid the identification of an individual unit or surgeon, no hospital level or surgeon level data will be published.Each participating centre, with equal right, will be able to access the data of the registry, perform statistical analysis, discuss the results and freely write scientific manuscripts. Each study that is generated based on the registry must be disseminated to all the centres before final publication.