Implementation of Psychological Treatment in Generalized Anxiety
IMPLEMENT2_0
Design Development in Randomized Clinical Trials - Psychological Treatment in Generalized Anxiety
1 other identifier
interventional
80
1 country
1
Brief Summary
Pragmatic randomized controlled trial (expected N = 80) of cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) to contrast two psychotherapeutic implementation strategies (State-of-the-Art welcome phase vs. prolonged focus on sudden changes). Blinded allocation of implementation strategy for patients; open label for therapists (no blinding possible), randomized allocation for patients, therapist allocation via ABAB-design (crossed-therapist design). Post treatment self-reported outcome will be measured based on a latent outcome factor (i. e. "outcome composite").
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P50-P75 for not_applicable
Started Jan 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
January 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
January 12, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
May 1, 2022
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
May 1, 2022
CompletedMay 26, 2022
May 1, 2022
5.3 years
January 12, 2017
May 19, 2022
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Change from baseline to 6 months treatment completion of a latent 5-facet, self-report outcome-factor
Latent factor of the below-mentioned 5 self-report questionnaires (outcome composite)
Baseline, treatment completion after 6 months (16 sessions)
Other Outcomes (5)
Penn State Worry Questionnaire [PSWQ]
Baseline, treatment completion after 6 months (16 sessions)
Beck Anxiety Inventory [BAI]
Baseline, treatment completion after 6 months (16 sessions)
Beck Depression Inventory II [BDI-II]
Baseline, treatment completion after 6 months (16 sessions)
- +2 more other outcomes
Study Arms (2)
State of the art (SOTA) check-in phase
EXPERIMENTALThe therapists will apply the usual SOTA check-in phase lasting between 5 and 10 minutes, as recommended in the preexisting guideline including reviewing progress in self-help and agenda setting (Zinbarg et al., 2006).
Prolonged focus on subtle changes
EXPERIMENTALBased on the robust findings that over 90% of the patients will experience subtle changes, the therapists will extend the above mentioned check-in phase by systematized focus for 7 to 20 minutes capitalizing on small and subtle changes and exceptions.
Interventions
The implementation of an evidence-based treatment is largely principle-based - allowing considerable therapeutic flexibility in determining and timing of different treatment aspects. In this condition progress, subtle changes and sudden gains may be an explicit topic and there is no restraint to avoid such topics. However, the therapists are not obligated to take a systematized focus on potential subtle changes and they may use the timing of the sessions to involve the patients into the other tasks of therapy.
Systematized sequence of exploration of subtle changes at a prolonged check-in phase: (1) the precise change situation, (2) related emotional states, (3) related helpful thoughts and self-verbalizations, (4) reinforcement of generalized self-efficacy and treatment motivation, (5) benefit for the upcoming session goals (Flückiger, Grosse Holtforth, et al. 2013, 2014).
In the present study, the MAW-packet will be applied within a usual 16-session individual therapy format and up to 3 further booster sessions. The session format of 50-60 minute usually consists of (a) a check-in phase of 5 to 15 minutes that includes a patients welcoming, reviewing self-help and agenda setting, (b) a working phase around 35-45 minutes that focuses on the previously agreed session goals, (c) a feedback phase of 5 to 10 minutes that summarizes the session and previews the upcoming self-help assignment.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- fulfill the diagnostic criteria for GAD based on the structured interview for DSM,
- are 18 years of age or older,
- Mastery of German language
- are seeking out a cognitive-behavioral therapy (CBT) for GAD at the outpatient clinic (Attenhoferstrasse 9) of the Institute for Psychology of the University of Zürich
- Informed consent as documented by signature
You may not qualify if:
- Acute Suicidal Ideation (BDI Suicide item \> 1 or suicidal ideation in the telephone interview)
- Currently taking a psychotic or bipolar disorder medication, or
- Currently receiving treatment from a professional psychotherapist/psychiatrist.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Department of Psychology, University of Zürich
Zurich, 8050, Switzerland
Related Publications (5)
Fluckiger C, Visla A, Wolfer C, Hilpert P, Zinbarg RE, Lutz W, Grosse Holtforth M, Allemand M. Exploring change in cognitive-behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder-A two-arms ABAB crossed-therapist randomized clinical implementation trial. J Consult Clin Psychol. 2021 May;89(5):454-468. doi: 10.1037/ccp0000639. Epub 2021 Apr 8.
PMID: 33829819RESULTVisla A, Allemand M, Fluckiger C. Within- and between-patients associations between self-efficacy, outcome expectation, and symptom change in cognitive behavioral therapy for generalized anxiety disorder. J Clin Psychol. 2023 Jan;79(1):86-104. doi: 10.1002/jclp.23407. Epub 2022 Jul 4.
PMID: 35781807DERIVEDVisla A, Constantino MJ, Fluckiger C. Predictors of change in patient treatment outcome expectation during cognitive-behavioral psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder. Psychotherapy (Chic). 2021 Jun;58(2):219-229. doi: 10.1037/pst0000371.
PMID: 34410791DERIVEDFluckiger C, Horvath AO, Brandt H. The evolution of patients' concept of the alliance and its relation to outcome: A dynamic latent-class structural equation modeling approach. J Couns Psychol. 2022 Jan;69(1):51-62. doi: 10.1037/cou0000555. Epub 2021 Jul 1.
PMID: 34197151DERIVEDFluckiger C, Wolfer C, Held J, Hilpert P, Rubel J, Allemand M, Zinbarg RE, Visla A. How to customize a bona fide psychotherapy for generalized anxiety disorder? A two-arms, patient blinded, ABAB crossed-therapist randomized clinical implementation trial design [IMPLEMENT 2.0]. BMC Psychiatry. 2018 Apr 3;18(1):86. doi: 10.1186/s12888-018-1666-2.
PMID: 29614982DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Christoph Flueckiger, Prof Dr.
Department of Psychology, University of Zürich
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
January 12, 2017
First Posted
March 14, 2017
Study Start
January 1, 2017
Primary Completion
May 1, 2022
Study Completion
May 1, 2022
Last Updated
May 26, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share