The Influence of Mindfulness on the Link Between Consumer Culture Values and Well-being
A Pilot RCT Intervention to Test the Impact of High and Low-intensity Mindfulness-based Cognitive Therapy (MBCT) on Self, Values, and Well-being
1 other identifier
interventional
180
0 countries
N/A
Brief Summary
The study is a three-arm intervention, where students are randomly assigned to one of three conditions: Teacher-led group-based MBCT, Self-guided MBCT using an audio book, or 'wait list' control. Pre-intervention, respondents complete a questionnaire assessing self, values, psychological processes related to self, and well-being. Post-intervention, respondents complete the same questionnaire, and then take part in a laboratory-based study which assesses behaviours related to the variables measured in the questionnaires. We are aiming for a sample size of 180 students at Sussex, 60 in each intervention arm.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P75+ for not_applicable
Started Sep 2016
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 30, 2016
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 2, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 14, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
September 28, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
September 28, 2017
CompletedJune 12, 2019
June 1, 2019
12 months
March 2, 2017
June 11, 2019
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (8)
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in Mental health
We are using a mental health assessment (DASS-21) widely used in clinical and non-clinical populations which assess symptoms of depression, anxiety, and stress
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in Subjective well-being
This measure consists of an assessment of life satisfaction, and a brief measure of the frequency of positive and negative affective experiences as used in (Dittmar and Kapur, 2011)
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in consumption-based coping
This is a newly developed scale which measures the extent to which individuals use buying material goods as a strategy to cope with stress (Wright et. al, 2016)
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by beingcollected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in body esteem
We are using a well-established scale of body esteem (Mendelson et al., 2001), which assesses general appearance evaluation, evaluation of one's weight, and perceived evaluation by others
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in material esteem
This is a newly developed scale that assesses individuals' esteem in terms of the material goods they own (Dittmar et al., 2016)
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in eating behaviour
We will use a shortened form of the Dutch Eating Behaviour Scale (Van Strien et al., 1986) which measures restraint, emotional, and external eating
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in excessive buying
This scale measures compulsive buying tendencies, such as having urges to buy or feeling out of control of one's shopping behaviour (Dittmar et al., 2007)
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Indicators of psychological well-being: Change in emotional regulation
This scale, developed by Bjureberg (2016), assessing difficulties that people experience in dealing with, and regulating strong emotions
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Secondary Outcomes (3)
Consumer culture values (materialistic and appearance-focused personal values)
This self-report measure will be collected five-six weeks before the intervention, immediately after the intervention, and immediately after exposure to consumer culture stimuli in phase 4 of the research
Behavioural measure related to consumer culture: eating
This behavioural measure will be collected immediately after exposure to consumer culture stimuli in phase 4 of the research
Behavioural measure related to consumer culture: buying consumer goods online
This behavioural measure will be collected immediately after exposure to consumer culture stimuli in phase 4 of the research
Other Outcomes (6)
Self and self-related processes: Change in core self beliefs
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Self and self-related processes: Change in self-discrepancies
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
Self and self-related processes: Change in self-compassion
The change in this self-report measure will be be measured by being collected five-six weeks before the intervention, and immediately after the intervention
- +3 more other outcomes
Study Arms (3)
Teacher-led MBCT course
EXPERIMENTALEight-session mindfulness-based cognitive therapy course, including an initial orientation session, led by a qualified mindfulness teacher working with the Sussex Mindfulness Centre, a part of the NHS Sussex Partnership Mental Health Trust.
Self-guided MBCT course
ACTIVE COMPARATORMindfulness-based cognitive therapy course, after an initial information session, which is self-guided using the audiobook Mindfulness: A practical guide to finding peace in a frantic world by Mark Williams and Danny Penman (2011). It consists of eight substantive chapters that map on to the eight-session MBCT course taught by teachers to groups of students. Students will be asked to work through one chapter a week, thus matching the pace of the teacher-led intervention.
Wait list control
NO INTERVENTIONStudents in the wait list (control) arm do not receive any intervention for the same length of time as the experimental and active comparator arms of the intervention are taking place. Students are invited to complete the self-guided MBCT course after the end of the research project.
Interventions
9 x 2 hour group sessions following national guidelines for mindfulness-based cognitive therapy
9 weeks of self-guided mindfulness-based cognitive therapy, following an audiobook covering the same material and exercises as the teacher-led intervention
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Student at the University of Sussex
You may not qualify if:
- Having experienced a significant life event (e.g., bereavement) in the six months proceeding the study Suffering from a mental health condition at clinical levels Having prior time commitments that prevent the respondents from taking parts in all phases of the study
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- University of Sussexlead
- Sussex Mindfulness Centrecollaborator
Related Publications (8)
Gu J, Strauss C, Crane C, Barnhofer T, Karl A, Cavanagh K, Kuyken W. Examining the factor structure of the 39-item and 15-item versions of the Five Facet Mindfulness Questionnaire before and after mindfulness-based cognitive therapy for people with recurrent depression. Psychol Assess. 2016 Jul;28(7):791-802. doi: 10.1037/pas0000263. Epub 2016 Apr 14.
PMID: 27078186BACKGROUNDEasterbrook, M. J., Wright, M. L., Dittmar, H., & Banerjee, R. (2014). Consumer culture ideals, extrinsic motivations, and well-being in children. European Journal of Social Psychology, 44(4), 349-359. doi:10.1002/ejsp.2020
BACKGROUNDFowler D, Freeman D, Smith B, Kuipers E, Bebbington P, Bashforth H, Coker S, Hodgekins J, Gracie A, Dunn G, Garety P. The Brief Core Schema Scales (BCSS): psychometric properties and associations with paranoia and grandiosity in non-clinical and psychosis samples. Psychol Med. 2006 Jun;36(6):749-59. doi: 10.1017/S0033291706007355. Epub 2006 Mar 27.
PMID: 16563204BACKGROUNDDittmar H, Beattie J, Friese S. Objects, decision considerations and self-image in men's and women's impulse purchases. Acta Psychol (Amst). 1996 Sep;93(1-3):187-206. doi: 10.1016/0001-6918(96)00019-4.
PMID: 8826795BACKGROUNDCrocker J, Luhtanen RK, Cooper ML, Bouvrette A. Contingencies of self-worth in college students: theory and measurement. J Pers Soc Psychol. 2003 Nov;85(5):894-908. doi: 10.1037/0022-3514.85.5.894.
PMID: 14599252BACKGROUNDGibbons FX, Buunk BP. Individual differences in social comparison: development of a scale of social comparison orientation. J Pers Soc Psychol. 1999 Jan;76(1):129-42. doi: 10.1037//0022-3514.76.1.129.
PMID: 9972558BACKGROUNDMendelson BK, Mendelson MJ, White DR. Body-esteem scale for adolescents and adults. J Pers Assess. 2001 Feb;76(1):90-106. doi: 10.1207/S15327752JPA7601_6.
PMID: 11206302BACKGROUNDBjureberg J, Ljotsson B, Tull MT, Hedman E, Sahlin H, Lundh LG, Bjarehed J, DiLillo D, Messman-Moore T, Gumpert CH, Gratz KL. Development and Validation of a Brief Version of the Difficulties in Emotion Regulation Scale: The DERS-16. J Psychopathol Behav Assess. 2016 Jun;38(2):284-296. doi: 10.1007/s10862-015-9514-x. Epub 2015 Sep 14.
PMID: 27239096BACKGROUND
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Helga Dittmar, DPhil
University of Sussex
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- SINGLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT
- Purpose
- OTHER
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 2, 2017
First Posted
March 14, 2017
Study Start
September 30, 2016
Primary Completion
September 28, 2017
Study Completion
September 28, 2017
Last Updated
June 12, 2019
Record last verified: 2019-06
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share