Evaluating the Device FLEXITHERALIGHT Compared to the Conventional Photodynamic Therapy
Flexithera
A Phase II Study Evaluating the Non-inferiority of the Device FLEXITHERALIGHT Compared to the Conventional Photodynamic Therapy (PDT)
2 other identifiers
interventional
29
1 country
1
Brief Summary
This study compares the efficacy and tolerance of a new device (FLEXITHERALIGHT) for photodynamic therapy in the treatment of keratosis actinic in comparison of classical PDT with Aktilite®.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at below P25 for not_applicable
Started Sep 2014
Typical duration for not_applicable
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
Study Start
First participant enrolled
September 1, 2014
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
February 1, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
February 1, 2017
CompletedFirst Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 7, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2017
CompletedApril 21, 2026
April 1, 2026
2.4 years
March 7, 2017
April 16, 2026
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Treated lesion response rate
Each treatment area will be counted, graded with Clinical grade of AK, mapped and photographed
up to month 6
Secondary Outcomes (7)
Visual Analog scale of pain
Day 1 and D ay 7.
Scale for clinical assessment of the subject's skin aspect
Months 3 and Months 6
Fluorescence measure of the PpIX
Baseline, after 3 hours of incubation, in case of treatment interruption, immediately after the treatment, and at 15 and 30 minutes after the end of the treatment.
Irradiance measure in mW/cm2 for each AK
during Aktilite® treatment at Day 1
Rate of patients with at least 75% of reduction of the lesions
Months 3 and Months 6
- +2 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Conventional PDT
ACTIVE COMPARATORAktilite® Galderma
FLEXITHERALIGHT PDT
EXPERIMENTALLight Emitting Textile Device
Interventions
Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 30 minutes+illumination 2.5 hours
Preparation of lesions, MAL application+occlusive dressing during 3 hours+illumination 7 to 10 minutes
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Clinical diagnosis of minimum 10 previously untreated not pigmented, non-hyperkeratotic AK lesions of Grade I and II of the forehead and/or scalp (according to Olsen et Al. JAAD 1991, cf. REF 31) where other therapies are unacceptable or considered medically less appropriate with a symmetrical repartition on both side of the forehead and/or scalp. The diagnosis of AK will be determined upon clinical evaluation (i.e. visual inspection and palpation) by the investigator.
- Symmetrical areas in terms of number and severity of lesions. The axis of symmetry between the two areas will be defined by the investigator according to the distribution of lesions.
- The two areas to be treated should not be coalescing. A minimum distance of 10mm is required between the lesions located on the 2 symmetrical areas. A minimum distance of 2 mm is required between the lesions on the same side.
- Minimum 5 lesions with similar dimensions at both symmetrical areas will be treated. If the number of lesions is \>7, only 7 lesions on each side will be considered.
You may not qualify if:
- Patients with porphyria.
- Patients immunosuppressed for idiopathic, disease specific or therapeutic reasons.
- Use of topical corticosteroids to lesional areas within 2 weeks before PDT.
- Patients receiving local treatment (including cryotherapy and curettage, any - Patients receiving topical treatment (including imiquimod, 5-FU and diclofenac, Picato) in face / scalp area within the last 3 months.
- Use of topical retinoids or alpha-hydroxy acids, urea or systemic retinoids, chemotherapy or immunotherapy within 4 weeks of PDT.
- Pigmented AK lesion(s).
- Known allergy to Metvixia, a similar PDT compound or excipients of the cream including arachis oil, or to peanut or soya.
- Participation in other clinical studies either currently or within the last 30 days.
- Female subjects must be of either:
- Non-childbearing potential, i.e. post-menopausal or have a confirmed clinical history of sterility (e.g. the subject is without a uterus) or, Childbearing potential, provided there is a confirmed negative urine pregnancy test prior to study treatment, to rule out pregnancy.
- Any condition which may be associated with a risk of poor protocol compliance.
- Patients currently receiving regular ultraviolet radiation therapy
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
CHRU, Hôpital Claude Huriez
Lille, France
Related Publications (2)
Vicentini C, Vignion-Dewalle AS, Thecua E, Lecomte F, Maire C, Deleporte P, Behal H, Kerob D, Duhamel A, Mordon S, Mortier L. Photodynamic therapy for actinic keratosis of the forehead and scalp: a randomized, controlled, phase II clinical study evaluating the noninferiority of a new protocol involving irradiation with a light-emitting, fabric-based device (the Flexitheralight protocol) compared with the conventional protocol involving irradiation with the Aktilite CL 128 lamp. Br J Dermatol. 2019 Apr;180(4):765-773. doi: 10.1111/bjd.17350. Epub 2019 Jan 18.
PMID: 30367470RESULTLecomte F, Vignion-Dewalle AS, Vicentini C, Thecua E, Deleporte P, Duhamel A, Mordon S, Mortier L. Evaluating the Noninferiority of a New Photodynamic Therapy (Flexitheralight) Compared With Conventional Treatment for Actinic Keratosis: Protocol for a Phase 2 Study. JMIR Res Protoc. 2019 Apr 26;8(4):e11530. doi: 10.2196/11530.
PMID: 31025952DERIVED
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Laurent Mortier, MD, PhD
University Hospital, Lille
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- SEQUENTIAL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 7, 2017
First Posted
March 10, 2017
Study Start
September 1, 2014
Primary Completion
February 1, 2017
Study Completion
February 1, 2017
Last Updated
April 21, 2026
Record last verified: 2026-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share