NCT03076723

Brief Summary

The purpose of the study is to determine if the so called pulsatility curve, which describes the relationship between intracranial pressure (ICP) and ICP pulsatility, can be used to predict outcome of treatment, in the form of shunt surgery, in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and to guide the adjustment of shunt opening pressure after the surgery. The main hypotheses of the study are:

  1. 1.The pulsatility curve may be the best auxiliary test to predict shunt surgery outcome in INPH patients. With a "fixed" shunt opening pressure, the preoperatively assessed potential pulse amplitude reduction (determined by analysis of the pulsatility curve) predicts postoperative improvement in gait velocity and cognitive functions.
  2. 2.A postoperative pulsatility curve can be used to further optimize ICP pulsatility by guiding opening pressure adjustment. Shunt adjustment based on the pulsatility curve three months postoperatively will increase improvement, but not complications, compared to a shunt with "fixed" opening pressure.
  3. 3.To determine if improvement three month after surgery is associated with postoperative reduction in pulse amplitude.
  4. 4.To determine if a pulsatility curve obtained preoperatively can predict improvement in gait velocity and cognitive functions in INPH patients three months after surgery.
  5. 5.To compare outcome six months after surgery and complications rates between INPH patients with a "fixed" opening pressure versus those where the shunt has been adjusted based on the pulsatility curve, three months after the shunt insertion.

Trial Health

60
Monitor

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
43

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Longer than P75 for not_applicable

Geographic Reach
2 countries

5 active sites

Status
terminated

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

December 13, 2016

Completed
3 months until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 10, 2017

Completed
3 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 13, 2017

Completed
4.6 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

December 31, 2021

Completed
Same day until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

December 31, 2021

Completed
Last Updated

May 23, 2022

Status Verified

May 1, 2022

Enrollment Period

4.6 years

First QC Date

December 13, 2016

Last Update Submit

May 16, 2022

Conditions

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (4)

  • Change in total score on European INPH scale

    scale describing the cardinal symptoms of INPH

    3 and 6 months after surgery

  • Gait velocity

    Maximal gait velocity (3 x 10 m)

    3 and 6 months after surgery

  • European INPH scale

    Change in total score on scale describing the cardinal symptoms of INPH

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

  • Gait velocity

    Maximal gait velocity (3 x 10 m)

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

Secondary Outcomes (9)

  • Computerized General Neuropsychological INPH Test (CoGNIT)

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

  • Timed up and go test

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

  • EuroQoL's (EQ) standardized 5 dimensions (5D) 5 levels (5L) instrument (EQ-5D-5L™)

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

  • Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

  • Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form (IIQ-7)

    baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery

  • +4 more secondary outcomes

Study Arms (2)

Fixed opening pressure

SHAM COMPARATOR

The shunt opening pressure is changed to the same setting as at surgery.

Other: Simulated change in shunt opening pressure

Individual shunt opening pressure

EXPERIMENTAL

The shunt opening pressure is adjusted (up one step, down one step or unchanged) according to an individual analysis of the pulsatility curve (as assessed after shunt surgery).

Other: Change in shunt opening pressure

Interventions

An individually determined change in shunt opening pressure is compared to no change in opening pressure.

Individual shunt opening pressure

The shunt opening pressure is reset to the same setting.

Fixed opening pressure

Eligibility Criteria

Age50 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)

You may qualify if:

  • Possible or probable INPH according to the INPH guidelines.
  • Symptom duration ≥ 3 months
  • Age ≥50 years
  • Able to walk 10 meters with or without an assistant device.
  • Decision to recommend shunt surgery based either on:
  • Improvement after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap (i.e. positive tap test), or;
  • Increased CSF outflow resistance, or;
  • A combination of "typical" signs/symptoms + "typical" MRI findings;
  • A combination of a-c.

You may not qualify if:

  • NPH due to hemorrhage, meningitis or stroke (secondary NPH).
  • Symptom duration ≥ 5 years.
  • Patients considered surgical risk.
  • Baseline gait velocity \>1.1 m/sec (60 m/min) without assistant device
  • Mini Mental State Exam score ≤ 20 points.
  • Musculoskeletal condition precluding gait assessment.
  • Severe hearing or visual impairment
  • Medication in the form of warfarin or novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC)
  • Insufficient pressure data below resting pressure during the CSF infusion investigation, i.e. no complete assessment of the pulsatility curve

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (5)

Kuopio university hospital

Kuopio, 70210, Finland

Location

Turku university hospital

Turku, 20521, Finland

Location

Sahlgrenska university hospital

Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden

Location

Umeå university hospital

Umeå, 90185, Sweden

Location

The Uppsala university hospital

Uppsala, 75185, Sweden

Location

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Hydrocephalus, Normal Pressure

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

HydrocephalusBrain DiseasesCentral Nervous System DiseasesNervous System Diseases

Study Officials

  • Jan Malm, MD, PhD

    Umeå University Hospital

    PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
  • Sara Qvarlander, PhD

    Umeå University

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
interventional
Phase
not applicable
Allocation
RANDOMIZED
Masking
QUADRUPLE
Who Masked
PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
Purpose
TREATMENT
Intervention Model
PARALLEL
Sponsor Type
OTHER
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

December 13, 2016

First Posted

March 10, 2017

Study Start

June 13, 2017

Primary Completion

December 31, 2021

Study Completion

December 31, 2021

Last Updated

May 23, 2022

Record last verified: 2022-05

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations