Study Stopped
Acceptable duration exceeded. Enrolment too slow due to covid pandemic and extensive protocol.
Using Cerebrospinal Fluid Dynamics to Optimize Treatment of Idiopathic Normal Pressure Hydrocephalus
PULSE-OPT
1 other identifier
interventional
43
2 countries
5
Brief Summary
The purpose of the study is to determine if the so called pulsatility curve, which describes the relationship between intracranial pressure (ICP) and ICP pulsatility, can be used to predict outcome of treatment, in the form of shunt surgery, in idiopathic normal pressure hydrocephalus (INPH) and to guide the adjustment of shunt opening pressure after the surgery. The main hypotheses of the study are:
- 1.The pulsatility curve may be the best auxiliary test to predict shunt surgery outcome in INPH patients. With a "fixed" shunt opening pressure, the preoperatively assessed potential pulse amplitude reduction (determined by analysis of the pulsatility curve) predicts postoperative improvement in gait velocity and cognitive functions.
- 2.A postoperative pulsatility curve can be used to further optimize ICP pulsatility by guiding opening pressure adjustment. Shunt adjustment based on the pulsatility curve three months postoperatively will increase improvement, but not complications, compared to a shunt with "fixed" opening pressure.
- 3.To determine if improvement three month after surgery is associated with postoperative reduction in pulse amplitude.
- 4.To determine if a pulsatility curve obtained preoperatively can predict improvement in gait velocity and cognitive functions in INPH patients three months after surgery.
- 5.To compare outcome six months after surgery and complications rates between INPH patients with a "fixed" opening pressure versus those where the shunt has been adjusted based on the pulsatility curve, three months after the shunt insertion.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
participants targeted
Target at P25-P50 for not_applicable
Started Jun 2017
Longer than P75 for not_applicable
5 active sites
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
December 13, 2016
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 10, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
June 13, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 31, 2021
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
December 31, 2021
CompletedMay 23, 2022
May 1, 2022
4.6 years
December 13, 2016
May 16, 2022
Conditions
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (4)
Change in total score on European INPH scale
scale describing the cardinal symptoms of INPH
3 and 6 months after surgery
Gait velocity
Maximal gait velocity (3 x 10 m)
3 and 6 months after surgery
European INPH scale
Change in total score on scale describing the cardinal symptoms of INPH
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
Gait velocity
Maximal gait velocity (3 x 10 m)
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
Secondary Outcomes (9)
Computerized General Neuropsychological INPH Test (CoGNIT)
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
Timed up and go test
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
EuroQoL's (EQ) standardized 5 dimensions (5D) 5 levels (5L) instrument (EQ-5D-5L™)
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
Urogenital Distress Inventory (UDI-6)
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
Incontinence Impact Questionnaire, Short Form (IIQ-7)
baseline (before surgery) and 3 months after surgery
- +4 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
Fixed opening pressure
SHAM COMPARATORThe shunt opening pressure is changed to the same setting as at surgery.
Individual shunt opening pressure
EXPERIMENTALThe shunt opening pressure is adjusted (up one step, down one step or unchanged) according to an individual analysis of the pulsatility curve (as assessed after shunt surgery).
Interventions
An individually determined change in shunt opening pressure is compared to no change in opening pressure.
The shunt opening pressure is reset to the same setting.
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Possible or probable INPH according to the INPH guidelines.
- Symptom duration ≥ 3 months
- Age ≥50 years
- Able to walk 10 meters with or without an assistant device.
- Decision to recommend shunt surgery based either on:
- Improvement after cerebrospinal fluid (CSF) tap (i.e. positive tap test), or;
- Increased CSF outflow resistance, or;
- A combination of "typical" signs/symptoms + "typical" MRI findings;
- A combination of a-c.
You may not qualify if:
- NPH due to hemorrhage, meningitis or stroke (secondary NPH).
- Symptom duration ≥ 5 years.
- Patients considered surgical risk.
- Baseline gait velocity \>1.1 m/sec (60 m/min) without assistant device
- Mini Mental State Exam score ≤ 20 points.
- Musculoskeletal condition precluding gait assessment.
- Severe hearing or visual impairment
- Medication in the form of warfarin or novel oral anticoagulant (NOAC)
- Insufficient pressure data below resting pressure during the CSF infusion investigation, i.e. no complete assessment of the pulsatility curve
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
- Umeå Universitylead
- Sahlgrenska University Hospitalcollaborator
- Uppsala University Hospitalcollaborator
- Kuopio University Hospitalcollaborator
Study Sites (5)
Kuopio university hospital
Kuopio, 70210, Finland
Turku university hospital
Turku, 20521, Finland
Sahlgrenska university hospital
Gothenburg, 41345, Sweden
Umeå university hospital
Umeå, 90185, Sweden
The Uppsala university hospital
Uppsala, 75185, Sweden
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
Jan Malm, MD, PhD
Umeå University Hospital
- STUDY DIRECTOR
Sara Qvarlander, PhD
Umeå University
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- QUADRUPLE
- Who Masked
- PARTICIPANT, CARE PROVIDER, INVESTIGATOR, OUTCOMES ASSESSOR
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- SPONSOR
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
December 13, 2016
First Posted
March 10, 2017
Study Start
June 13, 2017
Primary Completion
December 31, 2021
Study Completion
December 31, 2021
Last Updated
May 23, 2022
Record last verified: 2022-05
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will not share