NCT03075865

Brief Summary

OmniMax MMF system was designed as a device with faster application/removal time, less mucosal tissue overgrowth over the plates and screws, better tolerance for placement over prolong periods of time, better patient hygiene and a lower risk for further treatments secondary to root damage from the insertion of the screws, compared to the standard of care for maxillo-mandibular fixation and other hybrid systems. This clinical trial intends to highlight the clinical benefits of the OmniMax MMF system applied to patients undergoing repair of uncomplicated mandibular fracture(s) for whom OmniMax MMF system is used as a single mean for maxillo-mandibular fixation.

Trial Health

87
On Track

Trial Health Score

Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach

Enrollment
39

participants targeted

Target at P25-P50 for all trials

Timeline
Completed

Started Jun 2017

Geographic Reach
1 country

3 active sites

Status
completed

Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.

Trial Relationships

Click on a node to explore related trials.

Study Timeline

Key milestones and dates

First Submitted

Initial submission to the registry

March 3, 2017

Completed
6 days until next milestone

First Posted

Study publicly available on registry

March 9, 2017

Completed
4 months until next milestone

Study Start

First participant enrolled

June 28, 2017

Completed
1.5 years until next milestone

Primary Completion

Last participant's last visit for primary outcome

January 10, 2019

Completed
6 months until next milestone

Study Completion

Last participant's last visit for all outcomes

June 28, 2019

Completed
Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Status Verified

July 1, 2021

Enrollment Period

1.5 years

First QC Date

March 3, 2017

Last Update Submit

July 16, 2021

Conditions

Keywords

intermaxillary fixationmaxillo-mandibular fixation

Outcome Measures

Primary Outcomes (1)

  • Root Damage

    Dental root damage can be caused from insertion of the screws at time of implantation. Some of these events may require further medical or surgical treatment

    6 weeks

Secondary Outcomes (2)

  • Time for Implantation of OmniMax MMF

    Operative

  • Tissue necrosis and mucosal overgrowth

    6 weeks

Other Outcomes (2)

  • Patient Satisfaction

    6 weeks

  • Gloves Perforation and Accidental Puncture

    Operative

Study Arms (1)

OmniMax MMF

Patients involved in trauma events will receive intermaxillary fixation with OmniMax MMF system for temporary stabilization of mandibular fracture(s) to maintain proper occlusion during surgery and allow for postoperative fracture healing.

Device: OmniMax MMF system

Interventions

OmniMax MMF system consists of arch bars and screws that work together to achieve temporary fixation of the maxilla and mandible to provide indirect or passive stabilization of fractures and maintenance of occlusion in the oral and maxillofacial region. The arch bars have hooks designed to accommodate either wires or elastic bands for temporary maxillomandibular fixation (MMF) either intraoperative or postoperative.

Also known as: OmniMax
OmniMax MMF

Eligibility Criteria

Age18 Years+
Sexall
Healthy VolunteersNo
Age GroupsAdult (18-64), Older Adult (65+)
Sampling MethodNon-Probability Sample
Study Population

Adults involved in trauma events resulting in uncomplicated mandibular fractures and needing intermaxillary fixation for fracture repair and fracture healing.

You may qualify if:

  • Males or females
  • years of age or older
  • Able and willing to sign ICF and medical photography consent
  • Undergoing a surgical procedure to repair uncomplicated mandibular fracture(s) requiring open reduction internal fixation (ORIF) or closed maxillo-mandibular fixation (MMF)
  • Fracture repair done within 10 days after facial trauma
  • Use of OmniMax MMF system as a single mean for IMF (maxillary plate and mandibular plates together with no other device combined, such as Erich bars or IMF screws).

You may not qualify if:

  • General contraindications unfavorable for the use of MMF (psychological disorders, seizures disorders, airway compromise, immune-compromised patients, etc).
  • History of radiation therapy to the head or neck region.
  • Limited blood supply to the area of device application.
  • Insufficient quantity or quality of bone.
  • History of foreign body sensitivity.
  • History of previous use of bisphosphonates (i.e. alendronate, pamidronate, neridronate, olpadronate, ibandronate, risendronate, zolendronate).
  • Clinically active or latent infection.
  • Patients with less than 20 teeth.
  • Deciduous dentition.
  • Patients for whom the use of OmniMax MMF system would not be appropriate in judgment of the surgeon (i.e., excessive overjet or deep overbite).
  • Mandibular fracture pattern that could prevent the use of OmniMax MMF system for adequate reduction and stabilization (i.e., comminuted fractures, dental alveolar fractures).

Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.

Sponsors & Collaborators

Study Sites (3)

University of California Davis Medical Center

Sacramento, California, 95817, United States

Location

University of Iowa

Iowa City, Iowa, 52242, United States

Location

College of Dental Medicine

Charleston, South Carolina, 29425, United States

Location

Related Publications (22)

  • Engelstad ME, Kelly P. Embrasure wires for intraoperative maxillomandibular fixation are rapid and effective. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Jan;69(1):120-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.06.209. Epub 2010 Oct 29.

    PMID: 21035935BACKGROUND
  • Ansari K, Hamlar D, Ho V, Hilger P, Cote D, Aziz T. A comparison of anterior vs posterior isolated mandible fractures treated with intermaxillary fixation screws. Arch Facial Plast Surg. 2011 Jul-Aug;13(4):266-70. doi: 10.1001/archfacial.2011.46.

    PMID: 21768561BACKGROUND
  • Sahoo NK, Mohan R. IMF Screw: An Ideal Intermaxillary Fixation Device During Open Reduction of Mandibular Fracture. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2010 Jun;9(2):170-2. doi: 10.1007/s12663-010-0049-0. Epub 2010 Sep 22.

    PMID: 22190780BACKGROUND
  • Cornelius CP, Ehrenfeld M. The Use of MMF Screws: Surgical Technique, Indications, Contraindications, and Common Problems in Review of the Literature. Craniomaxillofac Trauma Reconstr. 2010 Jun;3(2):55-80. doi: 10.1055/s-0030-1254376.

    PMID: 22110819BACKGROUND
  • Roccia F, Rossi P, Gallesio C, Boffano P. Self-tapping and self-drilling screws for intermaxillary fixation in management of mandibular fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2009 Jan;20(1):68-70. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e318190df2f.

    PMID: 19164992BACKGROUND
  • Bagheri SC, Dimassi M, Shahriari A, Khan HA, Jo C, Steed MB. Facial trauma coverage among level-1 trauma centers of the United States. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2008 May;66(5):963-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.01.020.

    PMID: 18423287BACKGROUND
  • Gaujac C, Ceccheti MM, Yonezaki F, Garcia IR Jr, Peres MP. Comparative analysis of 2 techniques of double-gloving protection during arch bar placement for intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Oct;65(10):1922-5. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2006.06.311.

    PMID: 17884516BACKGROUND
  • Coletti DP, Salama A, Caccamese JF Jr. Application of intermaxillary fixation screws in maxillofacial trauma. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2007 Sep;65(9):1746-50. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2007.04.022.

    PMID: 17719392BACKGROUND
  • Fabbroni G, Aabed S, Mizen K, Starr DG. Transalveolar screws and the incidence of dental damage: a prospective study. Int J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2004 Jul;33(5):442-6. doi: 10.1016/j.ijom.2003.10.014.

    PMID: 15183406BACKGROUND
  • Ayoub AF, Rowson J. Comparative assessment of two methods used for interdental immobilization. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2003 Jun;31(3):159-61. doi: 10.1016/s1010-5182(03)00022-2.

    PMID: 12818601BACKGROUND
  • Vartanian AJ, Alvi A. Bone-screw mandible fixation: an intraoperative alternative to arch bars. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 2000 Dec;123(6):718-21. doi: 10.1067/mhn.2000.111286.

    PMID: 11112964BACKGROUND
  • Valentino J, Marentette LJ. Supplemental maxillomandibular fixation with miniplate osteosynthesis. Otolaryngol Head Neck Surg. 1995 Feb;112(2):215-20. doi: 10.1016/S0194-59989570239-3.

    PMID: 7838541BACKGROUND
  • Hashemi HM, Parhiz A. Complications using intermaxillary fixation screws. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 May;69(5):1411-4. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.05.070. Epub 2011 Jan 8.

    PMID: 21216063BACKGROUND
  • Nandini GD, Balakrishna R, Rao J. Self Tapping Screws v/s Erich Arch Bar for Inter Maxillary Fixation: A Comparative Clinical Study in the Treatment of Mandibular Fractures. J Maxillofac Oral Surg. 2011 Jun;10(2):127-31. doi: 10.1007/s12663-011-0191-3. Epub 2011 Apr 20.

    PMID: 22654363BACKGROUND
  • Rai A, Datarkar A, Borle RM. Are maxillomandibular fixation screws a better option than Erich arch bars in achieving maxillomandibular fixation? A randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2011 Dec;69(12):3015-8. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2010.12.015. Epub 2011 Apr 5.

    PMID: 21470746BACKGROUND
  • Schulte-Geers M, Kater W, Seeberger R. Root trauma and tooth loss through the application of pre-drilled transgingival fixation screws. J Craniomaxillofac Surg. 2012 Oct;40(7):e214-7. doi: 10.1016/j.jcms.2011.10.022. Epub 2011 Nov 17.

    PMID: 22099624BACKGROUND
  • Park KN, Oh SM, Lee CY, Kim JY, Yang BE. Design and application of hybrid maxillomandibular fixation for facial bone fractures. J Craniofac Surg. 2013;24(5):1801-5. doi: 10.1097/SCS.0b013e3182a21163.

    PMID: 24036784BACKGROUND
  • Chao AH, Hulsen J. Bone-supported arch bars are associated with comparable outcomes to Erich arch bars in the treatment of mandibular fractures with intermaxillary fixation. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2015 Feb;73(2):306-13. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.08.025. Epub 2014 Aug 27.

    PMID: 25488313BACKGROUND
  • Ingole PD, Garg A, Shenoi SR, Badjate SJ, Budhraja N. Comparison of intermaxillary fixation screw versus eyelet interdental wiring for intermaxillary fixation in minimally displaced mandibular fracture: a randomized clinical study. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 May;72(5):958.e1-7. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2014.01.005. Epub 2014 Jan 18.

    PMID: 24642133BACKGROUND
  • West GH, Griggs JA, Chandran R, Precheur HV, Buchanan W, Caloss R. Treatment outcomes with the use of maxillomandibular fixation screws in the management of mandible fractures. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2014 Jan;72(1):112-20. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2013.08.001. Epub 2013 Sep 25.

    PMID: 24075236BACKGROUND
  • Meursinge Reynders R, Ladu L, Ronchi L, Di Girolamo N, de Lange J, Roberts N, Pluddemann A. Insertion torque recordings for the diagnosis of contact between orthodontic mini-implants and dental roots: protocol for a systematic review. Syst Rev. 2015 Apr 2;4:39. doi: 10.1186/s13643-015-0014-6.

    PMID: 25875916BACKGROUND
  • Laurentjoye M, Majoufre-Lefebvre C, Siberchicot F, Ricard AS. Result of maxillomandibular fixation using intraoral cortical bone screws for condylar fractures of the mandible. J Oral Maxillofac Surg. 2009 Apr;67(4):767-70. doi: 10.1016/j.joms.2008.06.055.

    PMID: 19304032BACKGROUND

MeSH Terms

Conditions

Mandibular Fractures

Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)

Jaw FracturesMaxillofacial InjuriesFacial InjuriesCraniocerebral TraumaTrauma, Nervous SystemNervous System DiseasesSkull FracturesFractures, BoneWounds and Injuries

Study Officials

  • Brian M Hatcher, PhD

    Zimmer Biomet CMF & Thoracic

    STUDY DIRECTOR

Study Design

Study Type
observational
Observational Model
COHORT
Time Perspective
PROSPECTIVE
Sponsor Type
INDUSTRY
Responsible Party
SPONSOR

Study Record Dates

First Submitted

March 3, 2017

First Posted

March 9, 2017

Study Start

June 28, 2017

Primary Completion

January 10, 2019

Study Completion

June 28, 2019

Last Updated

July 19, 2021

Record last verified: 2021-07

Data Sharing

IPD Sharing
Will not share

Locations