Study Stopped
cannot use bioabsorbable scaffold
DEB Versus 2nd Generation DES in Patients With In-Scaffold Restenosis of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
SMART-BRS-ISR
Randomized Controlled Trial for Comparison of Efficacy and Safety Between Drug-eluting Balloon and 2nd Generation Drug-Eluting Stent in Patients With In-Scaffold Restenosis of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold
1 other identifier
interventional
N/A
1 country
1
Brief Summary
The aim of the study is to compare angiographic outcomes following revascularization using drug-eluting balloon (DEB) versus 2nd generation drug-eluting stent (DES) in treatment of Bioresorbable Vascular Scaffold Restenosis.
Trial Health
Trial Health Score
Automated assessment based on enrollment pace, timeline, and geographic reach
Started Mar 2017
Shorter than P25 for not_applicable coronary-artery-disease
1 active site
Health score is calculated from publicly available data and should be used for screening purposes only.
Trial Relationships
Click on a node to explore related trials.
Study Timeline
Key milestones and dates
First Submitted
Initial submission to the registry
March 4, 2017
CompletedFirst Posted
Study publicly available on registry
March 8, 2017
CompletedStudy Start
First participant enrolled
March 8, 2017
CompletedPrimary Completion
Last participant's last visit for primary outcome
December 30, 2017
CompletedStudy Completion
Last participant's last visit for all outcomes
January 25, 2018
CompletedApril 22, 2024
April 1, 2024
10 months
March 4, 2017
April 19, 2024
Conditions
Keywords
Outcome Measures
Primary Outcomes (1)
Minimum lumen diameter (MLD) in BRS ISR lesion, post-PCI
13-month after index procedure
Secondary Outcomes (14)
post-PCI FFR value
Immediate after index procedure
post-PCI MLD
Immediate after index procedure
minimum stent area (MSA) measured by intravascular ultrasound (IVUS)
Immediate after index procedure
minimum stent area measured by optical coherence tomography (OCT)
Immediate after index procedure
follow-up FFR
13-month after index procedure
- +9 more secondary outcomes
Study Arms (2)
DEB strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORDEB procedure will be standardized in order to maximize drug delivery into target segment. Commercially available DEB will be used (Sequent Please, B Braun, Germany or Pantera Lux, Biotronik, German). The below requirements will be mandatorily recommended. 1. Residual stenosis after lesion preparation : %DS \<20% 2. Delivery time : \< 30 seconds 3. Total inflation time : \> at least 1 minute 4. Previous BVS : DEB diameter ratio : \> 1.0:1 5. Maximum inflation pressure : at least above nominal pressure of DEB
DES strategy
ACTIVE COMPARATORThe implantation of 2nd generation DES will be performed as universally recommended. In the DES group, the newest version of 2nd generation everolimus-eluting stent (Xience Alpine, Abbott Vascular, USA) will be recommended.
Interventions
In patients who have in-bioresorbable scaffold stenosis after bioresorbable scaffold implantation, PCI will performed according to the allocated arms 1. DEB strategy 2. DES strategy
Eligibility Criteria
You may qualify if:
- Subject age 19-85 years old
- Patients with BRS ISR and presented with angina symptom or objective sign of inducible myocardial ischemia (one of the followings)
- Visual stenosis ≥50% in ISR segment with typical angina symptom (CCS class ≥II) or positive non-invasive stress tests
- ISR lesion with fractional flow reserve (FFR) ≤0.80
- Visual stenosis ≥70% in ISR segment (in the absence of above 2 components)
- Patients with BRS ISR which can be treated by DEB angioplasty or second generation DES implantation
You may not qualify if:
- Cardiogenic shock (Killip class IV) already at presentation or the completion of culprit PCI
- Intolerance to Aspirin, Clopidogrel, Plasugrel, Ticagrelor, Heparin, Bivaluridin, or Everolimus, Zotarolimus
- Patients with active bleeding or history of gastrointestinal or genitourinary major bleeding within 3-month
- Chronic kidney disease (serum creatinine ≥2.0mg/dL or estimated glomerular filtration rate \<30ml/min)
- Known true anaphylaxis to contrast medium (not allergic reaction but anaphylactic shock)
- Non-cardiac co-morbid conditions are present with life expectancy \<1 year or that may result in protocol non-compliance (per site investigator's medical judgment).
- In-segment edge restenosis without definite involvement of previous BRS edge
- Unwillingness or inability to comply with the procedures described in this protocol.
Contact the study team to confirm eligibility.
Sponsors & Collaborators
Study Sites (1)
Samsung Medical Center
Seoul, 06351, South Korea
MeSH Terms
Conditions
Interventions
Condition Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Intervention Hierarchy (Ancestors)
Study Officials
- STUDY CHAIR
Joo-Yong Hahn, MD, PhD
Samsung Medical Center
Study Design
- Study Type
- interventional
- Phase
- not applicable
- Allocation
- RANDOMIZED
- Masking
- NONE
- Purpose
- TREATMENT
- Intervention Model
- PARALLEL
- Sponsor Type
- OTHER
- Responsible Party
- PRINCIPAL INVESTIGATOR
- PI Title
- Professor
Study Record Dates
First Submitted
March 4, 2017
First Posted
March 8, 2017
Study Start
March 8, 2017
Primary Completion
December 30, 2017
Study Completion
January 25, 2018
Last Updated
April 22, 2024
Record last verified: 2024-04
Data Sharing
- IPD Sharing
- Will share
After publication of first manuscript and trial results, the de-identified data will be shared by permission of principle investigator, when asked